Paper · 2023 · Journal of Phytopathology

Selectivity of chemical and biological foliar treatments on the phyllosphere communities of bacteria and fungi antagonistic to Fusarium verticillioides in maize

Paul Esteban Pherez Perrony; Rafaela Araújo Guimarães; Luisa Oliveira Reis; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Maize grain production in the tropics is affected by Fusarium verticillioides , leading to significant losses in yield and quality. Fungicides are commonly used to control foliar diseases and increase grain yield, but have limited efficacy against F. verticillioides and may even stimulate the fungus to produce mycotoxins. Biocontrol can reduce F. verticillioides populations and fumonisin, but little is known about the resulting microbial interactions on the phylloplane and their relationship with F. verticillioides . This study aimed at evaluating the impact of different foliar treatments on the cultivable phylloplane community of fungi and bacteria and their potential in controlling F. verticillioides in maize. Results showed that two sprays of Bacillus subtilis BIOUFLA2 increased the percentage of native phylloplane antagonist bacteria and fungi against F. verticillioides by 25.0% and 27.3%, respectively, compared with the water control. However, two sprays with a triazole + strobilurin fungicide at different phenological stages in maize reduced such antagonistic communities. From field trials, 34 bacteria and 13 fungi from the phylloplane were selected for their inhibitory activity against F. verticillioides , with most coming from the exclusive treatment with BIOUFLA2. The study also revealed that the biocontrol agent‐recruited phylloplane indigenous lineages act through antibiosis, competition, and parasitism. Therefore, the adoption of biocontrol to limit F. verticillioides population build‐up not only has a direct activity on the pathogen but also recruits fungal and bacterial antagonists that may act additively or synergistically with the applied biocontrol agent.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two sprays of Bacillus subtilis BIOUFLA2 increased the percentage of native phylloplane antagonist bacteria by 25.0% compared with the water control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
two sprays of Bacillus subtilis BIOUFLA2e0
Interactor
native phylloplane antagonist bacteria and fungie0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
F. verticillioidesFusarium verticillioidese0pathogen
Outcome
percentage of native phylloplane antagonist bacteriae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25.0%e0
Comparator
the water controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium verticillioides
Fusarium verticillioides · Second interactorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two sprays of Bacillus subtilis BIOUFLA2 increased the percentage of native phylloplane antagonist bacteria and fungi against F. verticillioides by 25.0% and 27.3%, respectively, compared with the water control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“antagonistic to Fusarium verticillioides in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two sprays of Bacillus subtilis BIOUFLA2 increased the percentage of native phylloplane antagonist fungi by 27.3% compared with the water control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
two sprays of Bacillus subtilis BIOUFLA2e0
Interactor
native phylloplane antagonist bacteria and fungie0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
F. verticillioidesFusarium verticillioidese0pathogen
Outcome
percentage of native phylloplane antagonist bacteria and fungie0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27.3%e0
Comparator
the water controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium verticillioides
Fusarium verticillioides · Second interactorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two sprays of Bacillus subtilis BIOUFLA2 increased the percentage of native phylloplane antagonist bacteria and fungi against F. verticillioides by 25.0% and 27.3%, respectively, compared with the water control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“antagonistic to Fusarium verticillioides in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two sprays with a triazole + strobilurin fungicide at different phenological stages reduced the antagonistic communities in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
two sprays with a triazole + strobilurin fungicidee1
Interactor
antagonistic communitiese1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
antagonistic communitiese1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“two sprays with a triazole + strobilurin fungicide at different phenological stages in maize reduced such antagonistic communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“antagonistic to Fusarium verticillioides in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–160 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field trials yielded 34 bacteria selected for inhibitory activity against F. verticillioides.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
F. verticillioidesFusarium verticillioidese2pathogen
Outcome
selected for their inhibitory activitye2
Value
34 bacteriae2
Setting
field trialse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium verticillioides
Fusarium verticillioides · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“From field trials, 34 bacteria and 13 fungi from the phylloplane were selected for their inhibitory activity against F. verticillioides, with most coming from the exclusive treatment with BIOUFLA2”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1104–1301 · show in text ↑
t0

“antagonistic to Fusarium verticillioides in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–160 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field trials yielded 13 fungi selected for inhibitory activity against F. verticillioides.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
F. verticillioidesFusarium verticillioidese2pathogen
Outcome
selected for their inhibitory activitye2
Value
13 fungie2
Setting
field trialse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium verticillioides
Fusarium verticillioides · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“From field trials, 34 bacteria and 13 fungi from the phylloplane were selected for their inhibitory activity against F. verticillioides, with most coming from the exclusive treatment with BIOUFLA2”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1104–1301 · show in text ↑
t0

“antagonistic to Fusarium verticillioides in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–160 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most selected antagonists came from the exclusive BIOUFLA2 treatment.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
exclusive treatment with BIOUFLA2e2
Outcome
most coming frome2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“From field trials, 34 bacteria and 13 fungi from the phylloplane were selected for their inhibitory activity against F. verticillioides, with most coming from the exclusive treatment with BIOUFLA2”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1104–1301 · show in text ↑
t0

“antagonistic to Fusarium verticillioides in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–160 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biocontrol agent-recruited phylloplane indigenous lineages act through antibiosis, competition and parasitism.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
phylloplane indigenous lineagese3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
act through antibiosis, competition, and parasitisme3
Qualifier
antibiosis, competition, and parasitisme3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The study also revealed that the biocontrol agent‐recruited phylloplane indigenous lineages act through antibiosis, competition, and parasitism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“antagonistic to Fusarium verticillioides in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–160 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 51 positive, 5 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.