Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Propyrisulfuron plus cyhalofop butyl as one-shot herbicides provide high weed control efficiency and net economic performance in mechanically transplanted rice

Zichang Zhang; Hongchun Wang; Tao Gu; et al.

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Propyrisulfuron is a novel pyrimidinylsulfonylurea herbicide with good activity for controlling annual weed in rice fields. To evaluate the economic performance of propyrisulfuron, a field study was conducted in 2021 and 2022 on a farm of the Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China. Eight different herbicide treatments were employed, including CB (cyhalofop butyl), Py (propyrisulfuron), CBPy (cyhalofop butyl plus propyrisulfuron), PrBe 3, PrBe 10, and PrBe 3+PrBe 10 (pretilachlor plus bensulfuron applied at different times [at 3 (PrBe 3) and 10 (PrBe 10) d] or sequentially, respectively), 2PrBe+PeCBBz (pretilachlor plus bensulfuron [applied sequentially] followed by penoxsulam plus cyhalofop butyl plus bentazone), 2PrBe+MeCBBz (pretilachlor plus bensulfuron [applied sequentially] followed by metamifop plus cyhalofop butyl plus bentazone), along with weed-free and nontreated weedy check treatments. Herbicide treatments did not cause visual phytotoxicity to rice, and bending and leaf rolling were not observed. Only the two propyrisulfuron treatments had temporary negative effects on rice height, but rice recovered quickly. Compared with the weed-free treatment, CBPy did not affect rice tiller number or dry matter accumulation. Compared with the nontreated weedy check, herbicide treatments reduced total weed density by 29.4% to 99.1% and dry biomass by 32.2% to 98.7%. The CBPy treatment provided the best weed control, reducing weed density and biomass by 96.7% and 95.9% in 2021 and 97.4% and 95.6% in 2022, respectively. Rice grain yield was not significantly different between CBPy and the weed-free treatment in either year. Economic analysis showed that CBPy provided the highest net profit, followed by that in 2PrBe+PeCBBz and 2PrBe+MeCBBz, with the lowest net profit in the nontreated weedy check. Thus, CBPy provides good weed control and could be promoted in mechanically transplanted rice fields in China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments did not cause visual phytotoxicity to rice.

Treatment
Herbicide treatmentse1
Outcome
visual phytotoxicitye1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mechanically transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“Herbicide treatments did not cause visual phytotoxicity to rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only the two propyrisulfuron treatments had temporary negative effects on rice height, and rice recovered quickly.

Treatment
propyrisulfuron treatmentse1
Outcome
rice heighte1
Direction
negative effectse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mechanically transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“Only the two propyrisulfuron treatments had temporary negative effects on rice height, but rice recovered quickly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with the weed-free treatment, CBPy did not affect rice tiller number or dry matter accumulation.

Treatment
CBPye1
Outcome
rice tiller number or dry matter accumulatione1
Direction
did not affecte1
Comparator
weed-free treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mechanically transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the weed-free treatment, CBPy did not affect rice tiller number or dry matter accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1251 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with the nontreated weedy check, herbicide treatments reduced total weed density by 29.4% to 99.1%.

Treatment
herbicide treatmentse1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
total weed densitye1
Direction
reducede1
Value
29.4% to 99.1%e1
Comparator
nontreated weedy checke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mechanically transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the nontreated weedy check, herbicide treatments reduced total weed density by 29.4% to 99.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with the nontreated weedy check, herbicide treatments reduced weed dry biomass by 32.2% to 98.7%.

Treatment
herbicide treatmentse1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
dry biomasse1
Direction
reducede1
Value
32.2% to 98.7%e1
Comparator
nontreated weedy checke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mechanically transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the nontreated weedy check, herbicide treatments reduced total weed density by 29.4% to 99.1% and dry biomass by 32.2% to 98.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1394 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The CBPy treatment reduced weed density by 96.7% in 2021.

Treatment
CBPy treatmente1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed densitye1
Direction
reducinge1
Value
96.7%e1
Qualifier
2021e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mechanically transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“The CBPy treatment provided the best weed control, reducing weed density and biomass by 96.7% and 95.9% in 2021 and 97.4% and 95.6% in 2022, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1549 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The CBPy treatment reduced weed biomass by 95.9% in 2021.

Treatment
CBPy treatmente1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
reducinge1
Value
95.9%e1
Qualifier
2021e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mechanically transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“The CBPy treatment provided the best weed control, reducing weed density and biomass by 96.7% and 95.9% in 2021 and 97.4% and 95.6% in 2022, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1549 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The CBPy treatment reduced weed density by 97.4% in 2022.

Treatment
CBPy treatmente1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed densitye1
Direction
reducinge1
Value
97.4%e1
Qualifier
2022e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mechanically transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“The CBPy treatment provided the best weed control, reducing weed density and biomass by 96.7% and 95.9% in 2021 and 97.4% and 95.6% in 2022, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1549 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The CBPy treatment reduced weed biomass by 95.6% in 2022.

Treatment
CBPy treatmente1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
reducinge1
Value
95.6%e1
Qualifier
2022e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mechanically transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“The CBPy treatment provided the best weed control, reducing weed density and biomass by 96.7% and 95.9% in 2021 and 97.4% and 95.6% in 2022, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1549 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice grain yield was not significantly different between CBPy and the weed-free treatment in either year.

Treatment
CBPye1
Outcome
Rice grain yielde1
Direction
not significantly differente1
Comparator
weed-free treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mechanically transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice grain yield was not significantly different between CBPy and the weed-free treatment in either year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CBPy provided the highest net profit, followed by 2PrBe+PeCBBz and 2PrBe+MeCBBz, with the lowest net profit in the nontreated weedy check.

Treatment
CBPye1
Outcome
net profite1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
followed by that in 2PrBe+PeCBBz and 2PrBe+MeCBBze1
Comparator
nontreated weedy checke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mechanically transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“Economic analysis showed that CBPy provided the highest net profit, followed by that in 2PrBe+PeCBBz and 2PrBe+MeCBBz, with the lowest net profit in the nontreated weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1832 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

CBPy provides good weed control and could be promoted in mechanically transplanted rice fields in China.

Outcome
could be promoted in mechanically transplanted rice fields in Chinae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“CBPy provides good weed control and could be promoted in mechanically transplanted rice fields in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1840–1943 · show in text ↑

herbicide · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

123 papers: 92 positive, 31 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

herbicide · crop injury · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 10 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

herbicide · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

603 papers: 579 positive, 24 negative or no effect

578 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

599 papers more in this group

See all 603 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.