Paper · 2001 · Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research

MONITORING PLANT GROWTH AND YIELD PRODUCTION IN SOME EGYPTIAN COTTON CULTIVARS USING PLANT MAP DATA

OSAMA M. M. WASSEL

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Management of cotton crop production environments requires the quantification of the effects of the environment on plant growth and yield. Plant mapping is a powerful technique for analyzing the fruiting patterns and for estimating potential yield of cotton crop. This paper presents a crop monitoring system based on plant map data to assist in the management of inputs for cotton production, using four Egyptian cotton cuttivars (G. 75, G. 77, G. 80 and G. 83) besides different treat­ments on Giza 80 cultivar during 1996, 1997 and 1998 growing sea­sons. Results obtained revealed that all the cultivars under study had the same behavior during different stages of plant growth, and they reached the cutout time approximately at the same stage of growth. Pix and hill spacing treatments on G. 80 cultivar plants revealed a trend to change the behavior of plants (as mapped), in different stages of growth. Applying Pix at the optimum time and of the optimum dose (250 ml i / fed at squaring + 250 m11 / fed at beginning of flowering) or using 30 cm between hills, had a good effect on the vigour of plants. Results also, cleared (by using plant map data) that the lower and middle zones of plant had the highest values of yield per plant with pref­erence to the first and second fruiting positions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The studied cotton cultivars showed similar growth behavior and reached cutout at approximately the same stage.

Outcome
same behavior during different stages of plant growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the cultivars under study had the same behavior during different stages of plant growth, and they reached the cutout time approximately at the same stage of growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–757 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pix treatment tended to change mapped plant behavior across growth stages.

Material
G. 80e0
Treatment
Pixe0
Outcome
behavior of plantse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pix and hill spacing treatments on G. 80 cultivar plants revealed a trend to change the behavior of plants (as mapped), in different stages of growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–908 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hill spacing treatment tended to change mapped plant behavior across growth stages.

Material
G. 80e0
Treatment
hill spacinge0
Outcome
behavior of plantse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pix and hill spacing treatments on G. 80 cultivar plants revealed a trend to change the behavior of plants (as mapped), in different stages of growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–908 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pix at the stated timing and dose improved plant vigour.

Treatment
Applying Pix at the optimum time and of the optimum dose (250 ml i / fed at squaring + 250 m11 / fed at beginning of flowering)e0
Outcome
vigour of plantse0
Direction
good effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying Pix at the optimum time and of the optimum dose (250 ml i / fed at squaring + 250 m11 / fed at beginning of flowering) or using 30 cm between hills, had a good effect on the vigour of plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing hills 30 cm apart improved plant vigour.

Treatment
30 cm between hillse0
Outcome
vigour of plantse0
Direction
good effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using 30 cm between hills, had a good effect on the vigour of plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower and middle plant zones had the highest per plant yield, favoring the first and second fruiting positions.

Organ / stage
lower and middle zonese0
Outcome
yield per plante0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lower and middle zones of plant had the highest values of yield per plant with pref­erence to the first and second fruiting positions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1301 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑

stage · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.