Paper · 2023 · Agriculture

Recurring Rolling/Crimping Effects on Termination Effectiveness of Iron Clay Pea and Pearl Millet Warm-Season Cover Crops

Ted S. Kornecki; Corey M. Kichler

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Summer cover crop utilization by no-till vegetable farms is essential for continuous soil protection, especially in the southern United States where intense storms are likely to occur in hot and humid summer months. A field experiment was conducted at the National Soil Dynamics Laboratory in Auburn, AL, USA, between the summers of 2015 and 2017 to determine the effectiveness of an experimental roller/crimper in mechanically terminating summer cover crops. Iron clay peas (Vigna unguiculata, L.) planted on a sandy loam and pearl millet (Penninsetum glaucum, L.) planted on clay soil were selected to determine termination rate effectiveness in single, double, and triple rolling/crimping over the same area. Overall, termination rates for both cover crops were higher for rolling three times (71%) compared to rolling once (55%) or twice (63%). However, cover crop termination was inhibited due to rainfalls on the experimental area during the three-week evaluation period. In 2016, drought conditions and high temperatures (32.6 °C) caused biomass reduction, especially for pearl millet, of over 31% to 39% compared to 2017 and 2015. Rolling provided higher soil-water conservation compared with the non-rolled control due the cover crop mulch layer blocking sunlight, keeping the soil surface cooler and preventing water evaporation. Recurrent rolling did not cause soil compaction above the 2.0 MPa level that inhibits root growth, but changes in soil strength were dependent on the soil moisture content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Termination rates were higher with rolling three times (71%) than with rolling once.

Taxon
cover cropst0
Treatment
rolling three timese1
Outcome
termination ratese1
Direction
highere1
Value
71%e1
Comparator
rolling oncee1
Setting
National Soil Dynamics Laboratory in Auburn, AL, USAe0

Verbatim

e1

“termination rates for both cover crops were higher for rolling three times (71%) compared to rolling once (55%) or twice (63%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iron Clay Pea and Pearl Millet Warm-Season Cover Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“National Soil Dynamics Laboratory in Auburn, AL, USA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–308 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Termination rates were higher with rolling twice (63%) than with rolling once.

Taxon
cover cropst0
Treatment
twicee1
Outcome
termination ratese1
Direction
highere1
Value
63%e1
Comparator
rolling oncee1

Verbatim

e1

“termination rates for both cover crops were higher for rolling three times (71%) compared to rolling once (55%) or twice (63%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iron Clay Pea and Pearl Millet Warm-Season Cover Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crop termination was inhibited by rainfall during the three-week evaluation period.

Taxon
cover cropst0
Treatment
rainfallse2
Outcome
cover crop terminatione2
Direction
inhibitede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“cover crop termination was inhibited due to rainfalls on the experimental area during the three-week evaluation period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–976 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iron Clay Pea and Pearl Millet Warm-Season Cover Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought and high temperature in 2016 reduced pearl millet biomass by 31% to 39% compared with 2017 and 2015.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanuse3
Treatment
drought conditions and high temperaturese3
Outcome
biomasse3
Direction
reductione3
Value
over 31% to 39%e3
Comparator
2017 and 2015e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“drought conditions and high temperatures (32.6 °C) caused biomass reduction, especially for pearl millet, of over 31% to 39% compared to 2017 and 2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rolling gave higher soil-water conservation than the non-rolled control, owing to the mulch layer blocking sunlight.

Taxon
cover cropst0
Treatment
Rollinge4
Outcome
soil-water conservatione4
Direction
highere4
Qualifier
cover crop mulch layer blocking sunlighte4
Comparator
non-rolled controle4

Verbatim

e4

“Rolling provided higher soil-water conservation compared with the non-rolled control due the cover crop mulch layer blocking sunlight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iron Clay Pea and Pearl Millet Warm-Season Cover Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recurrent rolling did not cause soil compaction above 2.0 MPa.

Taxon
cover cropst0
Treatment
Recurrent rollinge5
Outcome
soil compactione5
Direction
did not causee5
Value
2.0 MPae5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e5

“Recurrent rolling did not cause soil compaction above the 2.0 MPa level that inhibits root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1437 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iron Clay Pea and Pearl Millet Warm-Season Cover Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changes in soil strength depended on soil moisture content.

Taxon
cover cropst0
Outcome
changes in soil strengthe6
Qualifier
dependent on the soil moisture contente6

Verbatim

e6

“changes in soil strength were dependent on the soil moisture content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1511 · show in text ↑
t0

“Iron Clay Pea and Pearl Millet Warm-Season Cover Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–121 · show in text ↑

heat · growth · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

drought · growth · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 5 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.