Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Sowing Time and Spacing Influenced Yield, Quality and Economics of Bt Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

P. M. Patel; K. K. Patel; C. K. Patel

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field study was conducted in the 2019 kharif season at the Agronomy Instructional Farm, SDAU, SKNagar, Gujarat, India. To investigate that the sowing time and spacing influenced yield, quality and economics of Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in loamy sand soil. Twelve treatment combinations were examined, involving three sowing times (T1: 3rd week of May, T2: 1st week of June, T3: 3rd week of June) and four plant spacings (S1: 90 cm × 60 cm, S2: 90 cm × 45 cm, S3: 60 cm × 60 cm, S4: 60 cm × 45 cm). Four replications of a split plot design were used for the experiment. The third week of May was consistently the best time to sow cotton, according to the results, producing the maximum yields of seed cotton and stalk cotton. The quantity of monopodial branches/plant, harvest index and plant population as well as quality parameters such as oil content and ginning percentage were not significantly impacted by sowing time. The 3rd week of May sowing also yielded the highest benefit cost ratio and net realization. In terms of plant spacing, the spacing of 60 cm × 45 cm promoted highest plant population, taller plants and increased yield attributes like the bolls/plant, boll weight and seed cotton yield/plant. The highest seed cotton yield and stalk yield were achieved with this spacing. Harvest index and quality parameters were unaffected by plant spacing. The narrow spacing of 60 cm × 45 cm also resulted in the highest benefit cost ratio and net realization. The interaction effect between sowing time and plant spacing did not significantly influence growth, yield, yield attributes and quality parameters of Bt cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Third-week-of-May sowing produced the maximum seed-cotton and stalk-cotton yields.

Taxon
Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
third week of Maye0
Outcome
maximum yields of seed cotton and stalk cottone0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The third week of May was consistently the best time to sow cotton, according to the results, producing the maximum yields of seed cotton and stalk cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–734 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing time did not significantly affect monopodial branches, harvest index or plant population.

Taxon
Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
sowing timee0
Outcome
monopodial branches/plant, harvest index and plant populatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The quantity of monopodial branches/plant, harvest index and plant population as well as quality parameters such as oil content and ginning percentage were not significantly impacted by sowing time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–933 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing time did not significantly affect oil content or ginning percentage.

Taxon
Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
sowing timee0
Outcome
oil content and ginning percentagee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quality parameters such as oil content and ginning percentage were not significantly impacted by sowing time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–933 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Third-week-of-May sowing yielded the highest benefit-cost ratio and net realization.

Taxon
Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
3rd week of May sowinge0
Outcome
benefit cost ratio and net realizatione0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 3rd week of May sowing also yielded the highest benefit cost ratio and net realization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1025 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing at 60 cm × 45 cm gave the highest plant population and taller plants.

Taxon
Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
60 cm × 45 cme0
Outcome
plant population, taller plantse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the spacing of 60 cm × 45 cm promoted highest plant population, taller plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1130 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing at 60 cm × 45 cm increased bolls per plant, boll weight and seed-cotton yield per plant.

Taxon
Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
60 cm × 45 cme0
Outcome
bolls/plant, boll weight and seed cotton yield/plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“60 cm × 45 cm promoted highest plant population, taller plants and increased yield attributes like the bolls/plant, boll weight and seed cotton yield/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1223 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing at 60 cm × 45 cm produced the highest seed-cotton and stalk yields.

Taxon
Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume2
Treatment
60 cm × 45 cme1
Outcome
seed cotton yield and stalk yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest seed cotton yield and stalk yield were achieved with this spacing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1303 · show in text ↑
e1

“the spacing of 60 cm × 45 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1081 · show in text ↑
e2

“Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant spacing did not affect harvest index or quality parameters.

Taxon
Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
plant spacinge0
Outcome
Harvest index and quality parameterse0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvest index and quality parameters were unaffected by plant spacing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1374 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing at 60 cm × 45 cm yielded the highest benefit-cost ratio and net realization.

Taxon
Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
60 cm × 45 cme0
Outcome
benefit cost ratio and net realizatione0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The narrow spacing of 60 cm × 45 cm also resulted in the highest benefit cost ratio and net realization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1479 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing time and spacing showed no significant interaction for growth, yield, yield attributes or quality.

Taxon
Bt cottone0
Treatment
sowing time and plant spacinge0
Outcome
growth, yield, yield attributes and quality parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction effect between sowing time and plant spacing did not significantly influence growth, yield, yield attributes and quality parameters of Bt cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1641 · show in text ↑

sowing time · quality: oil · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

sowing time · quality: general · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

density · quality: general · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

sowing time · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.