Abstract
Five crops sorghum, sunflower, lady's finger, onion and cluster beans were tried both as intercrops and border crops in finger millet with three levels of N (70, 90 and 110 kg/ha). N, P and K uptake. by finger millet was affected markedly by the intercrops then the border crops. Sunflower as an intercrop competed for nutrient with finger millet to a greater extent followed by sorghum and the influence of onion and clusterbeans was minimum. Finger millet-sorghum combi- nation removed maximum N and sunflower association depleted more of P and K. Increased N application was found to increase the uptake of nutrients.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Intercrops affected finger millet N, P and K uptake more markedly than border crops.
- Taxon
- finger millet
Eleusine coracanae0 - Treatment
- intercropse0
- Outcome
- N, P and K uptakee0
- Direction
- affected markedlye0
- Comparator
- border cropse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“FINGER MILLET”
e0“N, P and K uptake. by finger millet was affected markedly by the intercrops then the border crops.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sunflower as an intercrop competed most strongly with finger millet for nutrients, followed by sorghum.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanae0
- Treatment
- Sunflower as an intercrope0
- Interactor
- Sunflower
Helianthus annuuse0weed - Outcome
- competed for nutrient with finger millete0
- Direction
- greater extente0
- Comparator
- sorghume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sunflower as an intercrop competed for nutrient with finger millet to a greater extent followed by sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Onion and clusterbeans had minimum influence on finger millet nutrient competition.
- Taxon
- FINGER MILLETEleusine coracanat0
- Interactor
- onion
Allium cepae0weed - Second interactor
- clusterbeans
Cyamopsis tetragonolobae0weed - Outcome
- influence of onion and clusterbeans was minimume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the influence of onion and clusterbeans was minimum”
t0“FINGER MILLET”
Claim · model-written summary
The finger millet-sorghum combination removed the maximum N.
- Taxon
- Finger milletEleusine coracanae0
- Treatment
- Finger millet-sorghum combi- natione0
- Outcome
- Ne0
- Direction
- maximume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Finger millet-sorghum combi- nation removed maximum N”
Claim · model-written summary
The sunflower association depleted more P and K.
- Taxon
- FINGER MILLETEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- sunflower associatione0
- Interactor
- sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0weed
- Outcome
- P and Ke0
- Direction
- depleted moree0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“FINGER MILLET”
e0“sunflower association depleted more of P and K”
Claim · model-written summary
Increased N application increased finger millet nutrient uptake.
- Taxon
- FINGER MILLETEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- Increased N applicatione0
- Outcome
- uptake of nutrientse0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“FINGER MILLET”
e0“Increased N application was found to increase the uptake of nutrients.”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.