Paper · 2023 · Applied and Environmental Soil Science

Impact of Pesticides on Diversity and Abundance of Predatory Arthropods in Rice Ecosystem

A. M. Raut; A. Najitha Banu; Waseem Akram; et al.

4
claims
5
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Rice (Oryza sativa) is one of the most important cereal crops with a diverse set of pests and natural enemies. Rice fields often support a high diversity of arthropods which contribute significantly to productivity. This diversity is frequently threatened due to indiscriminate applications of pesticides. Our aim was to emphasize on the predator diversity in agrochemical exposed rice field as well as on the impact of surrounding vegetation on beneficial insect diversity. Natural enemies’ data were recorded from randomly selected 10 quadrates by visual observation from each treatment. A total of 5,590 individuals of predators were observed during the study period which included 27 species belonging to 16 families from five orders of arthropods during the kharif season of rice. Statistically, there were no significant differences between the population of general natural enemies such as Odonata, Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, and Araneae in plots with insecticide and control during the different growth stages of rice cultivation. Diversity indices were almost similar in fields where pesticide was sprayed and not sprayed. Our study concluded that natural enemies are conserved by ensuring crop heterogeneity, growing insect-friendly plants (with high levels of nectar and pollen) as border crops, and judicious application of granule insecticide like cartap hydrochloride in a rice agro-ecosystem.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rice fields contained 5,590 predators in 27 species.

Outcome
individuals of predatorse0
Value
5,590e0
Qualifier
27 species belonging to 16 families from five orders of arthropodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A total of 5,590 individuals of predators were observed during the study period which included 27 species belonging to 16 families from five orders of arthropods during the kharif season of rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Natural enemy populations did not differ significantly between insecticide and control plots.

Treatment
plots with insecticidee0
Outcome
population of general natural enemiese0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no significant differences between the population of general natural enemies such as Odonata, Coleoptera, Hymenoptera, and Araneae in plots with insecticide and control during the different growth stages of rice cultivation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predator diversity indices were similar in sprayed and unsprayed fields.

Treatment
pesticide was sprayede0
Outcome
Diversity indicese0
Direction
almost similare0
Comparator
not sprayede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diversity indices were almost similar in fields where pesticide was sprayed and not sprayed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–79 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend crop heterogeneity, flowering border crops, and judicious granular insecticide to conserve natural enemies.

Outcome
natural enemies are conservede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“natural enemies are conserved by ensuring crop heterogeneity, growing insect-friendly plants (with high levels of nectar and pollen) as border crops, and judicious application of granule insecticide like cartap hydrochloride in a rice agro-ecosystem.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1405 · show in text ↑

insecticide · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 39 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

application · ecology: diversity · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

insecticide · ecology: diversity · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.