Paper · 2022 · Horticultural Science and Technology

Effects of the Application Times and Strength of Additional Fertilizers on Onion Bulb Quality Parameters at Harvest and during Storage

Jinwook Lee; Geon-Hee Park; Myung Hwan Na; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Excessive application of basal and additional fertilizers strongly affects the physiological responses of onion bulbs, including yield, quality, and decay during long-term storage. This study evaluated the effects of additional fertilizer application times and strength on onion bulb number and yield at harvest and bulb quality attributes during storage at ambient temperature and relative humidity. Relative to the recommended levels of additional and conventional fertilization for standard onion cultivation, 0.5-, 1-, 1.5-, and 2-fold application strengths and 1, 2, and 3 application times were tested in individual experiments. Although onion bulb number and fresh weight per bulb size were not affected by the application strength of additional fertilizer, onion bulb yield increased at the application strengths lower or higher than the recommended levels. Bulb fresh weight loss and bulb decay severity were the highest at the 2.0-fold application strength of additional fertilizer. With the increase in the application times of additional fertilizer, bulb yield increased gradually but bulb number and fresh weight per bulb size remained unchanged. Furthermore, bulb weight loss and decay severity were the highest when additional fertilizer was applied thrice. Therefore, heavy and repetitive application of additional fertilizers may reduce the quality of onion bulbs through weight loss and severe decay during storage at ambient temperature, regardless of the high bulb yield at harvest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional fertilizer strength did not affect bulb number.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
application strength of additional fertilizere0
Outcome
onion bulb numbere0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion bulb number and fresh weight per bulb size were not affected by the application strength of additional fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–763 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional fertilizer strength did not affect fresh weight per bulb size.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
application strength of additional fertilizere0
Outcome
fresh weight per bulb sizee0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion bulb number and fresh weight per bulb size were not affected by the application strength of additional fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–763 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulb yield increased at fertilizer strengths below or above recommended levels.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
application strengths lower or higher than the recommended levelse0
Outcome
onion bulb yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
recommended levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion bulb yield increased at the application strengths lower or higher than the recommended levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–864 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulb fresh weight loss was highest at 2.0-fold additional fertilizer strength.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
2.0-fold application strength of additional fertilizere0
Outcome
Bulb fresh weight losse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bulb fresh weight loss and bulb decay severity were the highest at the 2.0-fold application strength of additional fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulb decay severity was highest at 2.0-fold additional fertilizer strength.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
2.0-fold application strength of additional fertilizere0
Outcome
bulb decay severitye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bulb fresh weight loss and bulb decay severity were the highest at the 2.0-fold application strength of additional fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulb yield rose with additional fertilizer application times.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
increase in the application times of additional fertilizere0
Outcome
bulb yielde0
Direction
increased graduallye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the increase in the application times of additional fertilizer, bulb yield increased gradually”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulb number and fresh weight per bulb size remained unchanged as fertilizer application times increased.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
increase in the application times of additional fertilizere0
Outcome
bulb number and fresh weight per bulb sizee0
Direction
remained unchangede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the increase in the application times of additional fertilizer, bulb yield increased gradually but bulb number and fresh weight per bulb size remained unchanged”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1158 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulb weight loss was highest when additional fertilizer was applied thrice.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
additional fertilizer was applied thricee0
Outcome
bulb weight losse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bulb weight loss and decay severity were the highest when additional fertilizer was applied thrice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulb decay severity was highest when additional fertilizer was applied thrice.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepat0
Treatment
additional fertilizer was applied thricee0
Outcome
decay severitye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bulb weight loss and decay severity were the highest when additional fertilizer was applied thrice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑

fertilization · disease · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 22 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 53 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

463 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

526 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.