Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Enhancing Growth and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Varieties through Foliar Application of Micronutrients under Field Condition

Deepak Kumar Rawat; C. B. Verma; Sunil Kumar Prajapati; et al.

13
claims
32
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Extensively, it is imperative to address the pervasive issue of nutrient deficiencies among humans and animals in numerous underdeveloped regions. To tackle this challenge, a field experiment was conducted to investigate the impact of foliar applications of Zinc, Boron, and Iron on the growth, yield attributes, and overall yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties during the Rabi seasons of both 2018-19 and 2019-20. The field experiment was meticulously designed using a Split Plot Design, wherein three distinct chickpea varieties (V1-KGD-1168, V2-Radhey, and V3-KWR-108) were assigned to the main plots. The subplots were dedicated to seven micronutrient treatment combinations, namely (M1-Control), (M2-Zinc @ 0.5%), (M3-Boron @ 0.2%), (M4-Iron @ 0.1%), (M5-Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2%), (M6-Zinc @ 0.5% + Iron @ 0.1%), and (M7: Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2% + Iron @ 0.1%). Consequently, a total of 21 treatment combinations were meticulously replicated three times. The findings of the experiment unveiled that the Radhey variety significantly influenced various parameters, including plant height, the number of branches per plant, fresh plant weight, 100-seed weight (17.21, 17.25g), seed yield (2118, 2228 kg ha-1), gross return (112396, 113628 INR ha-1), net return (83154, 83616 INR ha-1), and the benefit-to-cost ratio (B: C ratio) (2.84, 2.79) of chickpea for both the years 2018-19 and 2019-20, respectively. Regarding the micronutrient treatments, the foliar application of Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2% + Iron @ 0.1% exhibited a notably positive impact on plant height, the number of branches per plant, fresh plant weight, 100-seed weight (16.94, 16.97g), seed yield (2162, 2276 kg ha-1), gross return (114634, 116076 INR ha-1), net return (85041, 85712 INR ha-1), and B: C ratio (2.87, 2.82) of chickpea during both the years 2018-19 and 2019-20, respectively. Based on these compelling results, farmers are strongly advised to cultivate the Radhey variety of chickpea while implementing foliar applications of Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2% + Iron @ 0.1% for enhanced growth and higher yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Radhey significantly influenced plant height, branch number and fresh plant weight.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Radheye0
Outcome
plant height, the number of branches per plant, fresh plant weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Radhey variety significantly influenced various parameters, including plant height, the number of branches per plant, fresh plant weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radhey 100-seed weight was 17.21 and 17.25 g in the two years.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Radheye1
Outcome
100-seed weighte0
Value
17.21, 17.25ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100-seed weight (17.21, 17.25g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1196 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“The findings of the experiment unveiled that the Radhey variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1041 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radhey seed yield was 2118 and 2228 kg ha-1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Radheye1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Value
2118, 2228 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield (2118, 2228 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“The findings of the experiment unveiled that the Radhey variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1041 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radhey gross return was 112396 and 113628 INR ha-1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Radheye1
Outcome
gross returne0
Value
112396, 113628 INR ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gross return (112396, 113628 INR ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“The findings of the experiment unveiled that the Radhey variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1041 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radhey net return was 83154 and 83616 INR ha-1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Radheye1
Outcome
net returne0
Value
83154, 83616 INR ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net return (83154, 83616 INR ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1305 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“The findings of the experiment unveiled that the Radhey variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1041 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radhey benefit-to-cost ratio was 2.84 and 2.79.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Radheye1
Outcome
benefit-to-cost ratioe0
Value
2.84, 2.79e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“benefit-to-cost ratio (B: C ratio) (2.84, 2.79)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1362 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“The findings of the experiment unveiled that the Radhey variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar zinc, boron and iron positively affected height, branches and fresh weight.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
foliar application of Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2% + Iron @ 0.1%e0
Outcome
plant height, the number of branches per plant, fresh plant weighte0
Direction
positive impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2% + Iron @ 0.1% exhibited a notably positive impact on plant height, the number of branches per plant, fresh plant weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1641 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar micronutrients gave 100-seed weights of 16.94 and 16.97 g.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2% + Iron @ 0.1%e1
Outcome
100-seed weighte0
Value
16.94, 16.97ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100-seed weight (16.94, 16.97g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1674 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“the foliar application of Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2% + Iron @ 0.1% exhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1469–1545 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar micronutrients gave seed yields of 2162 and 2276 kg ha-1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2% + Iron @ 0.1%e1
Outcome
seed yielde0
Value
2162, 2276 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed yield (2162, 2276 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1676–1707 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“the foliar application of Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2% + Iron @ 0.1% exhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1469–1545 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar micronutrients gave gross returns of 114634 and 116076 INR ha-1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
gross returne0
Value
114634, 116076 INR ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gross return (114634, 116076 INR ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1747 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar micronutrients gave net returns of 85041 and 85712 INR ha-1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
net returne0
Value
85041, 85712 INR ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net return (85041, 85712 INR ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1749–1783 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar micronutrients gave benefit-to-cost ratios of 2.87 and 2.82.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Value
2.87, 2.82e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B: C ratio (2.87, 2.82)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1789–1812 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Radhey with combined zinc, boron and iron foliar application.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Radheye0
Treatment
foliar applications of Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2% + Iron @ 0.1%e0
Outcome
enhanced growth and higher yieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“farmers are strongly advised to cultivate the Radhey variety of chickpea while implementing foliar applications of Zinc @ 0.5% + Boron @ 0.2% + Iron @ 0.1% for enhanced growth and higher yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1917–2110 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

71 papers: 67 positive, 4 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

iron atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

boron atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

30 papers: 30 positive, 0 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

177 papers: 173 positive, 4 negative or no effect

172 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

173 papers more in this group

See all 177 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.