Paper · 2023 · Green Processing and Synthesis

Effect of phytogenic iron nanoparticles on the bio-fortification of wheat varieties

Ubaid ul Hassan; Maarij Khan; Zohaib Younas; et al.

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Bio-fortification is a potential technique to tackle micronutrient deficiencies that remain. Wheat grain bio-fortification has the ability to decrease malnutrition because it represents one of the most essential staple crops. Bio-fortification is cost-effective and evidence-based sustainable technique to address malnutrition in wheat varieties possessing additional micronutrient contents. Nano-biofortification is a novel approach, enriching crops with essential nutrients in order to supplement human diets with balanced diets. The current study was designed to explore the potential role of phytogenic iron nanoparticles (Fe-NPs) to enhance nutritional contents in wheat plants to fulfill the nutrient deficiency important for human and animal health. In the current study, Fe-NPs were fabricated by using the extract of Mentha arvensis L. that were irregular in shape with an approximate size range of 40–100 nm. Further, Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) analyses were deployed to confirm the presence of t of various functional groups involved in the green and eco-friendly fabrication of Fe-NPs. The effects of phytogenic Fe-NPs were examined on various physiological and biochemical parameters such as total proline, total chlorophyll, carbohydrates, protein, crude fibers, and lipids contents. Moreover, wheat physiological and biochemical profiling was carried out, and it was noticed that Fe-NPs significantly altered the physico-biochemical profiling of wheat plants. Multiple methods of administration of Fe-NPs were used to fortify the wheat crop. However, the Fe-NPs assisted seed priming along with foliar applications at various concentrations (10, 20, and 30 mg·L −1 ) were found more suitable to enhance the contents of proline, Chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, carbohydrate, proteins, fibers, and lipids (20.22%, 18.23%, 17.25%, 16.32%, 12.34%, 24.31%, 19.52%, and 11.97%, respectively) in wheat plants. Further, wheat flour was exposed to digestive enzymes, with the iron content gradually increased in a dose-dependent manner. The nutritional analysis of wheat zinc (Zn), molybdenum (Mo), magnesium (Mg), iron (Fe), yttrium (Y), and copper (Cu) and the fatty acid profile have demonstrated divergent patterns of behavior. Similarly, iron content was also increased significantly in response to the exposure to Fe-NPs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming and foliar Fe-NPs enhanced wheat proline by 20.22%.

Treatment
Fe-NPs assisted seed priming along with foliar applicationse0
Outcome
prolinee0
Direction
enhancee0
Value
20.22%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Fe-NPs assisted seed priming along with foliar applications at various concentrations (10, 20, and 30 mg·L −1 ) were found more suitable to enhance the contents of proline, Chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, carbohydrate, proteins, fibers, and lipids (20.22%, 18.23%, 17.25%, 16.32%, 12.34%, 24.31%, 19.52%, and 11.97%, respectively) in wheat plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same application enhanced wheat chlorophyll a by 18.23%.

Treatment
Fe-NPs assisted seed priming along with foliar applicationse0
Outcome
Chlorophyll ae0
Direction
enhancee0
Value
18.23%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Fe-NPs assisted seed priming along with foliar applications at various concentrations (10, 20, and 30 mg·L −1 ) were found more suitable to enhance the contents of proline, Chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, carbohydrate, proteins, fibers, and lipids (20.22%, 18.23%, 17.25%, 16.32%, 12.34%, 24.31%, 19.52%, and 11.97%, respectively) in wheat plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same application enhanced wheat chlorophyll b by 17.25%.

Treatment
Fe-NPs assisted seed priming along with foliar applicationse0
Outcome
be0
Direction
enhancee0
Value
17.25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Fe-NPs assisted seed priming along with foliar applications at various concentrations (10, 20, and 30 mg·L −1 ) were found more suitable to enhance the contents of proline, Chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, carbohydrate, proteins, fibers, and lipids (20.22%, 18.23%, 17.25%, 16.32%, 12.34%, 24.31%, 19.52%, and 11.97%, respectively) in wheat plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same application enhanced wheat total chlorophyll by 16.32%.

Treatment
Fe-NPs assisted seed priming along with foliar applicationse0
Outcome
total chlorophylle0
Direction
enhancee0
Value
16.32%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Fe-NPs assisted seed priming along with foliar applications at various concentrations (10, 20, and 30 mg·L −1 ) were found more suitable to enhance the contents of proline, Chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, carbohydrate, proteins, fibers, and lipids (20.22%, 18.23%, 17.25%, 16.32%, 12.34%, 24.31%, 19.52%, and 11.97%, respectively) in wheat plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same application enhanced wheat carbohydrate content by 12.34%.

Treatment
Fe-NPs assisted seed priming along with foliar applicationse0
Outcome
carbohydratee0
Direction
enhancee0
Value
12.34%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Fe-NPs assisted seed priming along with foliar applications at various concentrations (10, 20, and 30 mg·L −1 ) were found more suitable to enhance the contents of proline, Chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, carbohydrate, proteins, fibers, and lipids (20.22%, 18.23%, 17.25%, 16.32%, 12.34%, 24.31%, 19.52%, and 11.97%, respectively) in wheat plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same application enhanced wheat protein content by 24.31%.

Treatment
Fe-NPs assisted seed priming along with foliar applicationse0
Outcome
proteinse0
Direction
enhancee0
Value
24.31%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Fe-NPs assisted seed priming along with foliar applications at various concentrations (10, 20, and 30 mg·L −1 ) were found more suitable to enhance the contents of proline, Chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, carbohydrate, proteins, fibers, and lipids (20.22%, 18.23%, 17.25%, 16.32%, 12.34%, 24.31%, 19.52%, and 11.97%, respectively) in wheat plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same application enhanced wheat fiber content by 19.52%.

Treatment
Fe-NPs assisted seed priming along with foliar applicationse0
Outcome
fiberse0
Direction
enhancee0
Value
19.52%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Fe-NPs assisted seed priming along with foliar applications at various concentrations (10, 20, and 30 mg·L −1 ) were found more suitable to enhance the contents of proline, Chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, carbohydrate, proteins, fibers, and lipids (20.22%, 18.23%, 17.25%, 16.32%, 12.34%, 24.31%, 19.52%, and 11.97%, respectively) in wheat plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same application enhanced wheat lipid content by 11.97%.

Treatment
Fe-NPs assisted seed priming along with foliar applicationse0
Outcome
lipidse0
Direction
enhancee0
Value
11.97%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Fe-NPs assisted seed priming along with foliar applications at various concentrations (10, 20, and 30 mg·L −1 ) were found more suitable to enhance the contents of proline, Chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, carbohydrate, proteins, fibers, and lipids (20.22%, 18.23%, 17.25%, 16.32%, 12.34%, 24.31%, 19.52%, and 11.97%, respectively) in wheat plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe-NPs significantly increased wheat iron content.

Treatment
Fe-NPse0
Outcome
iron contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, iron content was also increased significantly in response to the exposure to Fe-NPs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2260–2355 · show in text ↑

iron atom · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

24 papers: 18 positive, 6 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

iron atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

74 papers: 61 positive, 13 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

iron atom · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

iron atom · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

seed treatment · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 26 positive, 1 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

application · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

8 of 14 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.