Paper · 2023 · Agronomy

Straw Mulching Combined with Phosphorus Fertilizer Increases Fertile Florets of Wheat by Enhancing Leaf Photosynthesis and Assimilate Utilization

Wei Xie; Peng He; Hongliang Ma; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Lack of soil moisture and phosphorus deficiency limits wheat grain yield in dryland areas. However, the moisture-conserving effect of straw mulching combined with phosphor fertilization on fertile florets per spike (FFS) and grain yield remains unclear. During the 2020–2021 and 2021–2022 growing seasons, we investigated the combined effects of straw mulching (0 and 8000 kg ha−1) and phosphorus fertilization (0, 75, and 120 kg P2O5 ha−1) on spike development, assimilates’ availability, and the photosynthetic properties of flag leaves by conducting a field experiment. Compared with no straw mulch control, straw mulching increased fertile spike, grain number per spike (15.6%), and grain yield (22.6%), and grain number per spike was the most important contribution to increasing wheat grain yield (46%). An increase in grain number per spike is associated with FFS. Compared with no straw mulch control, straw mulching increased FFS by 19.5%, and it increased with increasing phosphorus fertilization levels. Moreover, straw mulching combined with phosphorus fertilization promoted the light compensation point (LCP), light saturation point (LSP), net photosynthetic rate (Pn), Chl b, and the maximal photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) of flag leaves to produce carbohydrates. Our study has shown that the primary factor for the divergence in FFS under straw mulching and phosphorus application was the efficiency of assimilate utilization in the spike, which ultimately led to increased grain number per spike and grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulching increased fertile spikes in wheat.

Treatment
straw mulchinge0
Outcome
fertile spikee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
no straw mulch controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with no straw mulch control, straw mulching increased fertile spike, grain number per spike (15.6%), and grain yield (22.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulching increased wheat grain number per spike by 15.6%.

Treatment
straw mulchinge0
Outcome
grain number per spikee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15.6%e0
Comparator
no straw mulch controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with no straw mulch control, straw mulching increased fertile spike, grain number per spike (15.6%), and grain yield (22.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulching increased wheat grain yield by 22.6%.

Treatment
straw mulchinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22.6%e0
Comparator
no straw mulch controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with no straw mulch control, straw mulching increased fertile spike, grain number per spike (15.6%), and grain yield (22.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain number per spike made the largest contribution to wheat yield increase, at 46%.

Organ / stage
grain number per spikee0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
46%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain number per spike was the most important contribution to increasing wheat grain yield (46%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–808 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain number per spike was associated with fertile florets per spike.

Organ / stage
FFSe0
Outcome
grain number per spikee0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in grain number per spike is associated with FFS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulching increased wheat fertile florets per spike by 19.5%.

Treatment
straw mulchinge0
Outcome
FFSe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19.5%e0
Comparator
no straw mulch controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with no straw mulch control, straw mulching increased FFS by 19.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–947 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertile florets per spike increased with phosphorus fertilization level.

Treatment
phosphorus fertilization levelse0
Outcome
FFSe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw mulching increased FFS by 19.5%, and it increased with increasing phosphorus fertilization levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulching with phosphorus fertilizer promoted flag-leaf light compensation point and light saturation point.

Treatment
straw mulching combined with phosphorus fertilizatione0
Outcome
light compensation point (LCP), light saturation point (LSP)e0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw mulching combined with phosphorus fertilization promoted the light compensation point (LCP), light saturation point (LSP), net photosynthetic rate (Pn), Chl b, and the maximal photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) of flag leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulching with phosphorus fertilizer promoted flag-leaf net photosynthetic rate, Chl b and maximal photosystem II efficiency.

Treatment
straw mulching combined with phosphorus fertilizatione0
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate (Pn), Chl b, and the maximal photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm)e0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw mulching combined with phosphorus fertilization promoted the light compensation point (LCP), light saturation point (LSP), net photosynthetic rate (Pn), Chl b, and the maximal photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) of flag leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spike assimilate utilization efficiency was identified as the primary factor in fertile floret divergence under straw mulch and phosphorus application.

Treatment
straw mulching and phosphorus applicatione0
Outcome
divergence in FFSe0
Qualifier
efficiency of assimilate utilization in the spikee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the primary factor for the divergence in FFS under straw mulching and phosphorus application was the efficiency of assimilate utilization in the spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1474 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors linked improved spike assimilate use to increased grain number and grain yield.

Outcome
increased grain number per spike and grain yielde0
Qualifier
efficiency of assimilate utilization in the spikee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the efficiency of assimilate utilization in the spike, which ultimately led to increased grain number per spike and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1548 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

133 papers: 126 positive, 7 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

129 papers more in this group

See all 133 papers →

organic · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 281 positive, 41 negative or no effect

280 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

organic · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.