Paper · 1990 · Madras Agricultural Journal

RESIDUAL EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT AMENDMENTS AND N LEVELS APPLIED TO THE PRECEDING RICE CROP ON THE SOIL PROPERTIES AND YIELD OF SUCCEEDING GREENGRAM CROP

JAGANNATHAN S; MAYALAGU K; PEER MOHAMED M; et al.

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In a field study with different amendments and N levels applied to the preceding rice in a light textured soil under two irrigation regimes revealed that the residual effect of coir-pith significantly increased the available N, P and K and organic carbon contents in soil. The highest greengram grain yield was obtained under the residual effect of clayey soil under I, regime but on par with coir-pith treatment. The residual effect of N levels on soil properties and yield were non-significant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual coir-pith significantly increased available soil N, P and K.

Treatment
coir-pithe0
Outcome
available N, P and Ke0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the residual effect of coir-pith significantly increased the available N, P and K and organic carbon contents in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual coir-pith significantly increased soil organic carbon.

Treatment
coir-pithe0
Outcome
organic carbon contents in soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the residual effect of coir-pith significantly increased the available N, P and K and organic carbon contents in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual clayey soil gave the highest greengram grain yield under I, regime, on par with coir-pith.

Treatment
clayey soile0
Outcome
greengram grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
coir-pith treatmente0
Setting
I, regimee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest greengram grain yield was obtained under the residual effect of clayey soil under I, regime but on par with coir-pith treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual N levels had nonsignificant effects on soil properties.

Treatment
N levelse0
Outcome
soil propertiese0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The residual effect of N levels on soil properties and yield were non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–495 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual N levels had nonsignificant effects on yield.

Treatment
N levelse0
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The residual effect of N levels on soil properties and yield were non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–495 · show in text ↑
t0

“GREENGRAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–145 · show in text ↑

growing medium · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.