Paper · 2023 · SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics

EVALUATION OF PEA GENOTYPES FOR SALT STRESS TOLERANCE

E. RASHID

20
claims
50
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Pea (Pisum sativum L.), a highly nutritious vegetable, is extremely sensitive to salt stress conditions. A pot study evaluated four pea genotypes (Samrina Zard, Climax, Ambassador, and Green Arrow) by exposing them to control, 2.5, 5.0, and 7.0 dS m-1 by applying NaCl, Na2SO4, MgSO4, and CaCl2 salts. The pots under a completely randomized design (CRD) layout had four replications. Immense genetic variations occurred among the pea genotypes under salt stress. Samrina Zard showed better physiological (transpiration and photosynthesis rates, stomatal conductance, water use efficiency, and chlorophyll) and morphological traits (shoot/root length, shoot/root dry weight, number of leaves per plant, and leaf area). Genotype Samrina Zard significantly maintained the highest percentage of shoot length (14.54%), root length (28.28%), shoot dry weight (19.58%), root dry weight (36.36%), number of leaves (27.24%), and leaf area (21.59%) at a higher level of salinity 7 dS m-1 compared with the control and all other treatments. In contrast, the Ambassador genotype was categorically salt-sensitive based on the least percentage increase in shoot length (22.42%), dry weight of shoot (67.57%), dry weight of root (59.59%), number of leaves (47.69%) and leaf area (23.72%). However, salinity reduced the physiological attributes in both genotypes. Regardless of salt treatments, Samrina Zard performed better than Ambassador regarding photosynthesis (48.07%), transpiration rate (18.76%), stomatal conductance (45.42%), water use efficiency (55.88%), and chlorophyll contents (29.44%). According to study findings, Samrina Zard performed best against salinity stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea genotypes varied strongly under salt stress.

Outcome
genetic variationse0
Qualifier
salt stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Immense genetic variations occurred among the pea genotypes under salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–461 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Samrina Zard had better physiological traits under salt stress.

Material
Samrina Zarde0
Outcome
transpiration and photosynthesis rates, stomatal conductance, water use efficiency, and chlorophylle0
Direction
bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Samrina Zard showed better physiological (transpiration and photosynthesis rates, stomatal conductance, water use efficiency, and chlorophyll)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–605 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Samrina Zard had better shoot/root length, shoot/root dry weight, leaf number and leaf area.

Material
Samrina Zarde0
Outcome
shoot/root length, shoot/root dry weight, number of leaves per plant, and leaf areae0
Direction
bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Samrina Zard showed better physiological (transpiration and photosynthesis rates, stomatal conductance, water use efficiency, and chlorophyll) and morphological traits (shoot/root length, shoot/root dry weight, number of leaves per plant, and leaf area)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–716 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Samrina Zard retained 14.54% shoot length at 7 dS m-1 salinity.

Material
Samrina Zarde0
Treatment
salinity 7 dS m-1e1
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
14.54%e0
Comparator
the control and all other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Samrina Zard significantly maintained the highest percentage of shoot length (14.54%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–812 · show in text ↑
e1

“at a higher level of salinity 7 dS m-1 compared with the control and all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1028 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Samrina Zard retained 28.28% root length at 7 dS m-1 salinity.

Material
Samrina Zarde1
Treatment
salinity 7 dS m-1e1
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
higheste1
Value
28.28%e0
Comparator
the control and all other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root length (28.28%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–834 · show in text ↑
e1

“Samrina Zard significantly maintained the highest percentage of shoot length (14.54%), root length (28.28%), shoot dry weight (19.58%), root dry weight (36.36%), number of leaves (27.24%), and leaf area (21.59%) at a higher level of salinity 7 dS m-1 compared with the control and all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–1028 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Samrina Zard retained 19.58% shoot dry weight at 7 dS m-1 salinity.

Material
Samrina Zarde1
Treatment
salinity 7 dS m-1e1
Outcome
shoot dry weighte0
Direction
higheste1
Value
19.58%e0
Comparator
the control and all other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot dry weight (19.58%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–861 · show in text ↑
e1

“Samrina Zard significantly maintained the highest percentage of shoot length (14.54%), root length (28.28%), shoot dry weight (19.58%), root dry weight (36.36%), number of leaves (27.24%), and leaf area (21.59%) at a higher level of salinity 7 dS m-1 compared with the control and all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–1028 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Samrina Zard retained 36.36% root dry weight at 7 dS m-1 salinity.

Material
Samrina Zarde1
Treatment
salinity 7 dS m-1e1
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
higheste1
Value
36.36%e0
Comparator
the control and all other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root dry weight (36.36%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–887 · show in text ↑
e1

“Samrina Zard significantly maintained the highest percentage of shoot length (14.54%), root length (28.28%), shoot dry weight (19.58%), root dry weight (36.36%), number of leaves (27.24%), and leaf area (21.59%) at a higher level of salinity 7 dS m-1 compared with the control and all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–1028 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Samrina Zard retained 27.24% leaf number at 7 dS m-1 salinity.

Material
Samrina Zarde1
Treatment
salinity 7 dS m-1e1
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
higheste1
Value
27.24%e0
Comparator
the control and all other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of leaves (27.24%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–914 · show in text ↑
e1

“Samrina Zard significantly maintained the highest percentage of shoot length (14.54%), root length (28.28%), shoot dry weight (19.58%), root dry weight (36.36%), number of leaves (27.24%), and leaf area (21.59%) at a higher level of salinity 7 dS m-1 compared with the control and all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–1028 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Samrina Zard retained 21.59% leaf area at 7 dS m-1 salinity.

Material
Samrina Zarde1
Treatment
salinity 7 dS m-1e1
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
higheste1
Value
21.59%e0
Comparator
the control and all other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf area (21.59%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–938 · show in text ↑
e1

“Samrina Zard significantly maintained the highest percentage of shoot length (14.54%), root length (28.28%), shoot dry weight (19.58%), root dry weight (36.36%), number of leaves (27.24%), and leaf area (21.59%) at a higher level of salinity 7 dS m-1 compared with the control and all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–1028 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ambassador was salt sensitive based on a 22.42% shoot length response.

Material
Ambassadore0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
least percentage increasee0
Value
22.42%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ambassador genotype was categorically salt-sensitive based on the least percentage increase in shoot length (22.42%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1163 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ambassador was salt sensitive based on a 67.57% shoot dry-weight response.

Material
Ambassadore1
Outcome
dry weight of shoote0
Direction
least percentage increasee1
Value
67.57%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry weight of shoot (67.57%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1193 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ambassador genotype was categorically salt-sensitive based on the least percentage increase in shoot length (22.42%), dry weight of shoot (67.57%), dry weight of root (59.59%), number of leaves (47.69%) and leaf area (23.72%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1272 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ambassador was salt sensitive based on a 59.59% root dry-weight response.

Material
Ambassadore1
Outcome
dry weight of roote0
Direction
least percentage increasee1
Value
59.59%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry weight of root (59.59%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1222 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ambassador genotype was categorically salt-sensitive based on the least percentage increase in shoot length (22.42%), dry weight of shoot (67.57%), dry weight of root (59.59%), number of leaves (47.69%) and leaf area (23.72%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1272 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ambassador was salt sensitive based on a 47.69% leaf-number response.

Material
Ambassadore1
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
least percentage increasee1
Value
47.69%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of leaves (47.69%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1249 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ambassador genotype was categorically salt-sensitive based on the least percentage increase in shoot length (22.42%), dry weight of shoot (67.57%), dry weight of root (59.59%), number of leaves (47.69%) and leaf area (23.72%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1272 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ambassador was salt sensitive based on a 23.72% leaf-area response.

Material
Ambassadore1
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
least percentage increasee1
Value
23.72%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf area (23.72%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1272 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ambassador genotype was categorically salt-sensitive based on the least percentage increase in shoot length (22.42%), dry weight of shoot (67.57%), dry weight of root (59.59%), number of leaves (47.69%) and leaf area (23.72%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1272 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced physiological attributes in both genotypes.

Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
physiological attributese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity reduced the physiological attributes in both genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1346 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Samrina Zard exceeded Ambassador photosynthesis by 48.07%.

Material
Samrina Zarde0
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
bettere0
Value
48.07%e0
Comparator
Ambassadore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Samrina Zard performed better than Ambassador regarding photosynthesis (48.07%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1458 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Samrina Zard exceeded Ambassador transpiration rate by 18.76%.

Material
Samrina Zarde0
Outcome
transpiration ratee0
Direction
bettere0
Value
18.76%e0
Comparator
Ambassadore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Samrina Zard performed better than Ambassador regarding photosynthesis (48.07%), transpiration rate (18.76%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1487 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Samrina Zard exceeded Ambassador stomatal conductance by 45.42%.

Material
Samrina Zarde0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
bettere0
Value
45.42%e0
Comparator
Ambassadore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Samrina Zard performed better than Ambassador regarding photosynthesis (48.07%), transpiration rate (18.76%), stomatal conductance (45.42%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1518 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Samrina Zard exceeded Ambassador water use efficiency by 55.88%.

Material
Samrina Zarde0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
bettere0
Value
55.88%e0
Comparator
Ambassadore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Samrina Zard performed better than Ambassador regarding photosynthesis (48.07%), transpiration rate (18.76%), stomatal conductance (45.42%), water use efficiency (55.88%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1549 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Samrina Zard exceeded Ambassador chlorophyll content by 29.44%.

Material
Samrina Zarde0
Outcome
chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
bettere0
Value
29.44%e0
Comparator
Ambassadore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Samrina Zard performed better than Ambassador regarding photosynthesis (48.07%), transpiration rate (18.76%), stomatal conductance (45.42%), water use efficiency (55.88%), and chlorophyll contents (29.44%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1584 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 3 positive, 43 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.