Abstract
Pea (Pisum sativum L.), a highly nutritious vegetable, is extremely sensitive to salt stress conditions. A pot study evaluated four pea genotypes (Samrina Zard, Climax, Ambassador, and Green Arrow) by exposing them to control, 2.5, 5.0, and 7.0 dS m-1 by applying NaCl, Na2SO4, MgSO4, and CaCl2 salts. The pots under a completely randomized design (CRD) layout had four replications. Immense genetic variations occurred among the pea genotypes under salt stress. Samrina Zard showed better physiological (transpiration and photosynthesis rates, stomatal conductance, water use efficiency, and chlorophyll) and morphological traits (shoot/root length, shoot/root dry weight, number of leaves per plant, and leaf area). Genotype Samrina Zard significantly maintained the highest percentage of shoot length (14.54%), root length (28.28%), shoot dry weight (19.58%), root dry weight (36.36%), number of leaves (27.24%), and leaf area (21.59%) at a higher level of salinity 7 dS m-1 compared with the control and all other treatments. In contrast, the Ambassador genotype was categorically salt-sensitive based on the least percentage increase in shoot length (22.42%), dry weight of shoot (67.57%), dry weight of root (59.59%), number of leaves (47.69%) and leaf area (23.72%). However, salinity reduced the physiological attributes in both genotypes. Regardless of salt treatments, Samrina Zard performed better than Ambassador regarding photosynthesis (48.07%), transpiration rate (18.76%), stomatal conductance (45.42%), water use efficiency (55.88%), and chlorophyll contents (29.44%). According to study findings, Samrina Zard performed best against salinity stress.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 20
Claim · model-written summary
Pea genotypes varied strongly under salt stress.
- Taxon
- Pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse1 - Outcome
- genetic variationse0
- Qualifier
- salt stresse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Immense genetic variations occurred among the pea genotypes under salt stress”
e1“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Samrina Zard had better physiological traits under salt stress.
- Taxon
- Pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse1 - Material
- Samrina Zarde0
- Outcome
- transpiration and photosynthesis rates, stomatal conductance, water use efficiency, and chlorophylle0
- Direction
- bettere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Samrina Zard showed better physiological (transpiration and photosynthesis rates, stomatal conductance, water use efficiency, and chlorophyll)”
e1“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Samrina Zard had better shoot/root length, shoot/root dry weight, leaf number and leaf area.
- Taxon
- Pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse1 - Material
- Samrina Zarde0
- Outcome
- shoot/root length, shoot/root dry weight, number of leaves per plant, and leaf areae0
- Direction
- bettere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Samrina Zard showed better physiological (transpiration and photosynthesis rates, stomatal conductance, water use efficiency, and chlorophyll) and morphological traits (shoot/root length, shoot/root dry weight, number of leaves per plant, and leaf area)”
e1“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Samrina Zard retained 14.54% shoot length at 7 dS m-1 salinity.
- Taxon
- Pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse2 - Material
- Samrina Zarde0
- Treatment
- salinity 7 dS m-1e1
- Outcome
- shoot lengthe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 14.54%e0
- Comparator
- the control and all other treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Samrina Zard significantly maintained the highest percentage of shoot length (14.54%)”
e1“at a higher level of salinity 7 dS m-1 compared with the control and all other treatments”
e2“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Samrina Zard retained 28.28% root length at 7 dS m-1 salinity.
- Taxon
- Pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse2 - Material
- Samrina Zarde1
- Treatment
- salinity 7 dS m-1e1
- Outcome
- root lengthe0
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 28.28%e0
- Comparator
- the control and all other treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“root length (28.28%)”
e1“Samrina Zard significantly maintained the highest percentage of shoot length (14.54%), root length (28.28%), shoot dry weight (19.58%), root dry weight (36.36%), number of leaves (27.24%), and leaf area (21.59%) at a higher level of salinity 7 dS m-1 compared with the control and all other treatments”
e2“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Samrina Zard retained 19.58% shoot dry weight at 7 dS m-1 salinity.
- Taxon
- Pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse2 - Material
- Samrina Zarde1
- Treatment
- salinity 7 dS m-1e1
- Outcome
- shoot dry weighte0
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 19.58%e0
- Comparator
- the control and all other treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“shoot dry weight (19.58%)”
e1“Samrina Zard significantly maintained the highest percentage of shoot length (14.54%), root length (28.28%), shoot dry weight (19.58%), root dry weight (36.36%), number of leaves (27.24%), and leaf area (21.59%) at a higher level of salinity 7 dS m-1 compared with the control and all other treatments”
e2“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Samrina Zard retained 36.36% root dry weight at 7 dS m-1 salinity.
- Taxon
- Pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse2 - Material
- Samrina Zarde1
- Treatment
- salinity 7 dS m-1e1
- Outcome
- root dry weighte0
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 36.36%e0
- Comparator
- the control and all other treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“root dry weight (36.36%)”
e1“Samrina Zard significantly maintained the highest percentage of shoot length (14.54%), root length (28.28%), shoot dry weight (19.58%), root dry weight (36.36%), number of leaves (27.24%), and leaf area (21.59%) at a higher level of salinity 7 dS m-1 compared with the control and all other treatments”
e2“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Samrina Zard retained 27.24% leaf number at 7 dS m-1 salinity.
- Taxon
- Pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse2 - Material
- Samrina Zarde1
- Treatment
- salinity 7 dS m-1e1
- Outcome
- number of leavese0
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 27.24%e0
- Comparator
- the control and all other treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“number of leaves (27.24%)”
e1“Samrina Zard significantly maintained the highest percentage of shoot length (14.54%), root length (28.28%), shoot dry weight (19.58%), root dry weight (36.36%), number of leaves (27.24%), and leaf area (21.59%) at a higher level of salinity 7 dS m-1 compared with the control and all other treatments”
e2“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Samrina Zard retained 21.59% leaf area at 7 dS m-1 salinity.
- Taxon
- Pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse2 - Material
- Samrina Zarde1
- Treatment
- salinity 7 dS m-1e1
- Outcome
- leaf areae0
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 21.59%e0
- Comparator
- the control and all other treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“leaf area (21.59%)”
e1“Samrina Zard significantly maintained the highest percentage of shoot length (14.54%), root length (28.28%), shoot dry weight (19.58%), root dry weight (36.36%), number of leaves (27.24%), and leaf area (21.59%) at a higher level of salinity 7 dS m-1 compared with the control and all other treatments”
e2“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Ambassador was salt sensitive based on a 22.42% shoot length response.
- Taxon
- Pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse1 - Material
- Ambassadore0
- Outcome
- shoot lengthe0
- Direction
- least percentage increasee0
- Value
- 22.42%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Ambassador genotype was categorically salt-sensitive based on the least percentage increase in shoot length (22.42%)”
e1“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Ambassador was salt sensitive based on a 67.57% shoot dry-weight response.
- Taxon
- Pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse2 - Material
- Ambassadore1
- Outcome
- dry weight of shoote0
- Direction
- least percentage increasee1
- Value
- 67.57%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“dry weight of shoot (67.57%)”
e1“Ambassador genotype was categorically salt-sensitive based on the least percentage increase in shoot length (22.42%), dry weight of shoot (67.57%), dry weight of root (59.59%), number of leaves (47.69%) and leaf area (23.72%)”
e2“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Ambassador was salt sensitive based on a 59.59% root dry-weight response.
- Taxon
- Pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse2 - Material
- Ambassadore1
- Outcome
- dry weight of roote0
- Direction
- least percentage increasee1
- Value
- 59.59%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“dry weight of root (59.59%)”
e1“Ambassador genotype was categorically salt-sensitive based on the least percentage increase in shoot length (22.42%), dry weight of shoot (67.57%), dry weight of root (59.59%), number of leaves (47.69%) and leaf area (23.72%)”
e2“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Ambassador was salt sensitive based on a 47.69% leaf-number response.
- Taxon
- Pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse2 - Material
- Ambassadore1
- Outcome
- number of leavese0
- Direction
- least percentage increasee1
- Value
- 47.69%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“number of leaves (47.69%)”
e1“Ambassador genotype was categorically salt-sensitive based on the least percentage increase in shoot length (22.42%), dry weight of shoot (67.57%), dry weight of root (59.59%), number of leaves (47.69%) and leaf area (23.72%)”
e2“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Ambassador was salt sensitive based on a 23.72% leaf-area response.
- Taxon
- Pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse2 - Material
- Ambassadore1
- Outcome
- leaf areae0
- Direction
- least percentage increasee1
- Value
- 23.72%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“leaf area (23.72%)”
e1“Ambassador genotype was categorically salt-sensitive based on the least percentage increase in shoot length (22.42%), dry weight of shoot (67.57%), dry weight of root (59.59%), number of leaves (47.69%) and leaf area (23.72%)”
e2“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity reduced physiological attributes in both genotypes.
- Taxon
- Pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse1 - Treatment
- salinitye0
- Outcome
- physiological attributese0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“salinity reduced the physiological attributes in both genotypes”
e1“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Samrina Zard exceeded Ambassador photosynthesis by 48.07%.
- Taxon
- Pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse1 - Material
- Samrina Zarde0
- Outcome
- photosynthesise0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- 48.07%e0
- Comparator
- Ambassadore0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Samrina Zard performed better than Ambassador regarding photosynthesis (48.07%)”
e1“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Samrina Zard exceeded Ambassador transpiration rate by 18.76%.
- Taxon
- Pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse1 - Material
- Samrina Zarde0
- Outcome
- transpiration ratee0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- 18.76%e0
- Comparator
- Ambassadore0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Samrina Zard performed better than Ambassador regarding photosynthesis (48.07%), transpiration rate (18.76%)”
e1“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Samrina Zard exceeded Ambassador stomatal conductance by 45.42%.
- Taxon
- Pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse1 - Material
- Samrina Zarde0
- Outcome
- stomatal conductancee0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- 45.42%e0
- Comparator
- Ambassadore0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Samrina Zard performed better than Ambassador regarding photosynthesis (48.07%), transpiration rate (18.76%), stomatal conductance (45.42%)”
e1“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Samrina Zard exceeded Ambassador water use efficiency by 55.88%.
- Taxon
- Pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse1 - Material
- Samrina Zarde0
- Outcome
- water use efficiencye0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- 55.88%e0
- Comparator
- Ambassadore0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Samrina Zard performed better than Ambassador regarding photosynthesis (48.07%), transpiration rate (18.76%), stomatal conductance (45.42%), water use efficiency (55.88%)”
e1“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Samrina Zard exceeded Ambassador chlorophyll content by 29.44%.
- Taxon
- Pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse1 - Material
- Samrina Zarde0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll contentse0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- 29.44%e0
- Comparator
- Ambassadore0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Samrina Zard performed better than Ambassador regarding photosynthesis (48.07%), transpiration rate (18.76%), stomatal conductance (45.42%), water use efficiency (55.88%), and chlorophyll contents (29.44%)”
e1“Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”
The same questions in other papers
salinity · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
42 papers more in this group
See all 46 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.