Paper · 2023 · Agricultural Research Journal

Tillage and potassium nutrition effects on soil and plant properties in wheat under different irrigation conditions

Harmanpreet Singh; Sanjay K Sharma

10
claims
30
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

E stablishment of a suitable tillage system for improving wheat yield under variable level of irrigation and potassium is important for developing sustainable agriculture.Thus, present investigation was carried out at Experimental Farm, Department of soil science, CSKHPKV, Palampur during Rabi 2016-17 to evaluate the effect of different combination of tillage, irrigation and potassium on nutrient uptake by plants and soil properties.The field experiment was laid out in split-plot design with two tillage methods i.e., C 1 : Conventional tillage and C 2 : Conservation tillage and two irrigation Levels i.e., I 1 : No irrigation and I 2 : Two irrigations in main plot and three Potassium level i.e., K1:100%, K 2 :125%, and K 3 :150% of recommended dose of potassium in sub-plots with three replications.Maximum uptake of N, P and K was observed under conservation tillage system and among the irrigation level, application of two irrigation remained best over no irrigation.Among the potassium level, wheat crop fertilized with 150% of recommended dose of potassium recorded maximum uptake of N, P and K. Soil properties viz., soil pH, soil organic carbon and available N, P and K improved under conservation tillage and two irrigation applications at both depths while soil pH and soil organic carbon were not affected by different level of potassium.However, available potassium was more improved by 150% of recommended dose of potassium at both depths.Bulk density of soil at both the depth was more improved under conventional tillage system, no irrigation supply and 100% recommended dose of potassium.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage produced maximum wheat N, P, and K uptake.

Treatment
conservation tillage systeme0
Outcome
uptake of N, P and Ke0
Direction
Maximume0
Setting
Palampure1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum uptake of N, P and K was observed under conservation tillage system and among the irrigation level, application of two irrigation remained best over no irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“present investigation was carried out at Experimental Farm, Department of soil science, CSKHPKV, Palampur during Rabi 2016-17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations performed better than no irrigation for wheat nutrient uptake.

Treatment
two irrigatione0
Outcome
uptake of N, P and Ke0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
no irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum uptake of N, P and K was observed under conservation tillage system and among the irrigation level, application of two irrigation remained best over no irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“present investigation was carried out at Experimental Farm, Department of soil science, CSKHPKV, Palampur during Rabi 2016-17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150% potassium dose produced maximum wheat N, P, and K uptake.

Treatment
150% of recommended dose of potassiume0
Outcome
uptake of N, P and Ke0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the potassium level, wheat crop fertilized with 150% of recommended dose of potassium recorded maximum uptake of N, P and K.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“present investigation was carried out at Experimental Farm, Department of soil science, CSKHPKV, Palampur during Rabi 2016-17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage improved soil pH, organic carbon, and available N, P, and K at both depths.

Treatment
conservation tillagee0
Outcome
soil pH, soil organic carbon and available N, P and Ke0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
at both depthse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil properties viz., soil pH, soil organic carbon and available N, P and K improved under conservation tillage and two irrigation applications at both depths while soil pH and soil organic carbon were not affected by different level of potassium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1357 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“present investigation was carried out at Experimental Farm, Department of soil science, CSKHPKV, Palampur during Rabi 2016-17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations improved soil pH, organic carbon, and available N, P, and K at both depths.

Treatment
two irrigation applicationse0
Outcome
soil pH, soil organic carbon and available N, P and Ke0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
at both depthse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil properties viz., soil pH, soil organic carbon and available N, P and K improved under conservation tillage and two irrigation applications at both depths while soil pH and soil organic carbon were not affected by different level of potassium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1357 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“present investigation was carried out at Experimental Farm, Department of soil science, CSKHPKV, Palampur during Rabi 2016-17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium level did not affect soil pH or soil organic carbon.

Treatment
different level of potassiume0
Outcome
soil pH and soil organic carbone0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil properties viz., soil pH, soil organic carbon and available N, P and K improved under conservation tillage and two irrigation applications at both depths while soil pH and soil organic carbon were not affected by different level of potassium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1357 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“present investigation was carried out at Experimental Farm, Department of soil science, CSKHPKV, Palampur during Rabi 2016-17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150% potassium dose improved available soil potassium at both depths.

Treatment
150% of recommended dose of potassiume0
Outcome
available potassiume0
Direction
more improvede0
Qualifier
at both depthse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, available potassium was more improved by 150% of recommended dose of potassium at both depths.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1460 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“present investigation was carried out at Experimental Farm, Department of soil science, CSKHPKV, Palampur during Rabi 2016-17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage improved soil bulk density at both depths.

Treatment
conventional tillage systeme0
Outcome
Bulk density of soile0
Direction
more improvede0
Qualifier
at both the depthe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bulk density of soil at both the depth was more improved under conventional tillage system, no irrigation supply and 100% recommended dose of potassium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1612 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“present investigation was carried out at Experimental Farm, Department of soil science, CSKHPKV, Palampur during Rabi 2016-17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No irrigation improved soil bulk density at both depths.

Treatment
no irrigation supplye0
Outcome
Bulk density of soile0
Direction
more improvede0
Qualifier
at both the depthe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bulk density of soil at both the depth was more improved under conventional tillage system, no irrigation supply and 100% recommended dose of potassium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1612 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“present investigation was carried out at Experimental Farm, Department of soil science, CSKHPKV, Palampur during Rabi 2016-17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% recommended potassium dose improved soil bulk density at both depths.

Treatment
100% recommended dose of potassiume0
Outcome
Bulk density of soile0
Direction
more improvede0
Qualifier
at both the depthe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bulk density of soil at both the depth was more improved under conventional tillage system, no irrigation supply and 100% recommended dose of potassium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1612 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“present investigation was carried out at Experimental Farm, Department of soil science, CSKHPKV, Palampur during Rabi 2016-17”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–302 · show in text ↑

potassium · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.