Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Efficacy of New Generation Herbicides in Soybean (Glycine max. L)

N. Sravya; Sreedhar Chauhan; K. Bhanu Rekha; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Adilabad, Telangana during Kharif, 2022 to assess the efficacy of new generation herbicides in soybean (Glycine max. L). The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with 11 treatments and replicated thrice. Results revealed that among herbicidal treatments, pre-emergence application of Diclosulam 84% WDG @ 26 g ha-1fb post-emergence of Fluazifop-p-butyl 11.1% w/w + Fomesafen 11.1% w/w SL @ 250 g ha-1 recorded lowest weed density, biomass, weed index and higher weed control efficiency, seed and haulm yield. It was followed by pre-emergence application of Imazethapyr 2% EC + Pendimethalin 30% EC mix @ 960 g ha-1fb post-emergence Fluazifop-p-butyl 11.1% w/w + Fomesafen 11.1% w/w SL @ 250 g ha-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In soybean, pre-emergence Diclosulam followed by post-emergence Fluazifop-p-butyl plus Fomesafen recorded the lowest weed density, weed biomass and weed index among the herbicidal treatments.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
pre-emergence application of Diclosulam 84% WDG @ 26 g ha-1fb post-emergence of Fluazifop-p-butyl 11.1% w/w + Fomesafen 11.1% w/w SL @ 250 g ha-1e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed density, biomass, weed indexe0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
herbicidal treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“herbicidal treatments, pre-emergence application of Diclosulam 84% WDG @ 26 g ha-1fb post-emergence of Fluazifop-p-butyl 11.1% w/w + Fomesafen 11.1% w/w SL @ 250 g ha-1 recorded lowest weed density, biomass, weed index and higher weed control efficiency, seed and haulm yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In soybean, pre-emergence Diclosulam followed by post-emergence Fluazifop-p-butyl plus Fomesafen gave higher weed control efficiency, seed yield and haulm yield among the herbicidal treatments.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
pre-emergence application of Diclosulam 84% WDG @ 26 g ha-1fb post-emergence of Fluazifop-p-butyl 11.1% w/w + Fomesafen 11.1% w/w SL @ 250 g ha-1e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed control efficiency, seed and haulm yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
herbicidal treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“herbicidal treatments, pre-emergence application of Diclosulam 84% WDG @ 26 g ha-1fb post-emergence of Fluazifop-p-butyl 11.1% w/w + Fomesafen 11.1% w/w SL @ 250 g ha-1 recorded lowest weed density, biomass, weed index and higher weed control efficiency, seed and haulm yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The second-ranked treatment in soybean was pre-emergence Imazethapyr plus Pendimethalin followed by post-emergence Fluazifop-p-butyl plus Fomesafen.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
pre-emergence application of Imazethapyr 2% EC + Pendimethalin 30% EC mix @ 960 g ha-1fb post-emergence Fluazifop-p-butyl 11.1% w/w + Fomesafen 11.1% w/w SL @ 250 g ha-1e0
Outcome
followed bye0
Direction
followed bye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“followed by pre-emergence application of Imazethapyr 2% EC + Pendimethalin 30% EC mix @ 960 g ha-1fb post-emergence Fluazifop-p-butyl 11.1% w/w + Fomesafen 11.1% w/w SL @ 250 g ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–778 · show in text ↑

fomesafen · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 20 positive, 4 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Diclosulam · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fluazifop-P-butyl · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

herbicide · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

297 papers: 258 positive, 39 negative or no effect

257 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 13 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

293 papers more in this group

See all 297 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.