Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Effect of Integrated Nutrients Management (INM) Practices on Growth and Yield of Radish

Bhaskar Anand; Deependra Yadav; Sandeep Kumar

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) is necessary to enhance sustainable yield in an eco-friendly way. A field experiment was conducted during November 2021 in winter season at School of Agriculture, Abhilashi University Mandi (Chail Chowk), Himachal Pradesh to study the effect of integrated nutrients management on growth and yield of the radish cv. Pusa Desi. The experiment consisted of 7 treatments with control, laid out in Randomized Block Design with three replications. The treatment combination consisted of organic manure (FYM and Vermicompost) and inorganic fertilizers (NPK). The quantitative growth and yield parameters were recorded at 30 DAS and at harvest. Number of leaves (7.72) at 30 DAS and (14.28) at harvest, root length (12.10 cm) at 30 DAS and (26.43 cm) at harvest, root diameter (3.13 cm) at 30 DAS and (5.70 cm) at harvest, was recorded in T5 (NPK 50% + FYM 25% + Vermicompost 25%) Whereas the fresh weight (195.18 g) and dry weight of roots (39.04 g), root yield per plot (28.23 kg), root yield per hectare (470.53 q) and harvest index (45.45%) was also maximum recorded in T5 (NPK 50% + FYM 25% + Vermicompost 25%). The study suggested that the combined application of inorganic and organic manure and fertilizers (NPK 50% + FYM 25% +Vermicompost 25%) was highly beneficial for all the growth and yield parameters of radish.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave 7.72 leaves at 30 DAS and 14.28 at harvest.

Treatment
T5 (NPK 50% + FYM 25% + Vermicompost 25%)e0
Outcome
Number of leavese0
Value
7.72e0
Qualifier
14.28e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Number of leaves (7.72) at 30 DAS and (14.28) at harvest, root length (12.10 cm) at 30 DAS and (26.43 cm) at harvest, root diameter (3.13 cm) at 30 DAS and (5.70 cm) at harvest, was recorded in T5 (NPK 50% + FYM 25% + Vermicompost 25%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“Radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 produced root lengths of 12.10 cm at 30 DAS and 26.43 cm at harvest.

Treatment
T5 (NPK 50% + FYM 25% + Vermicompost 25%)e0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Value
12.10 cme0
Qualifier
26.43 cme0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root length (12.10 cm) at 30 DAS and (26.43 cm) at harvest, root diameter (3.13 cm) at 30 DAS and (5.70 cm) at harvest, was recorded in T5 (NPK 50% + FYM 25% + Vermicompost 25%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“Radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 produced root diameters of 3.13 cm at 30 DAS and 5.70 cm at harvest.

Treatment
T5 (NPK 50% + FYM 25% + Vermicompost 25%)e0
Outcome
root diametere0
Value
3.13 cme0
Qualifier
5.70 cme0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root diameter (3.13 cm) at 30 DAS and (5.70 cm) at harvest, was recorded in T5 (NPK 50% + FYM 25% + Vermicompost 25%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“Radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave the maximum fresh root weight of 195.18 g.

Treatment
T5 (NPK 50% + FYM 25% + Vermicompost 25%)e0
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
195.18 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fresh weight (195.18 g) and dry weight of roots (39.04 g), root yield per plot (28.23 kg), root yield per hectare (470.53 q) and harvest index (45.45%) was also maximum recorded in T5 (NPK 50% + FYM 25% + Vermicompost 25%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave the maximum dry root weight of 39.04 g.

Treatment
T5 (NPK 50% + FYM 25% + Vermicompost 25%)e0
Outcome
dry weight of rootse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
39.04 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fresh weight (195.18 g) and dry weight of roots (39.04 g), root yield per plot (28.23 kg), root yield per hectare (470.53 q) and harvest index (45.45%) was also maximum recorded in T5 (NPK 50% + FYM 25% + Vermicompost 25%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave the maximum root yield per plot of 28.23 kg.

Treatment
T5 (NPK 50% + FYM 25% + Vermicompost 25%)e0
Outcome
root yield per plote0
Direction
maximume0
Value
28.23 kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root yield per plot (28.23 kg), root yield per hectare (470.53 q) and harvest index (45.45%) was also maximum recorded in T5 (NPK 50% + FYM 25% + Vermicompost 25%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave the maximum root yield per hectare of 470.53 q.

Treatment
T5 (NPK 50% + FYM 25% + Vermicompost 25%)e0
Outcome
root yield per hectaree0
Direction
maximume0
Value
470.53 qe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root yield per hectare (470.53 q) and harvest index (45.45%) was also maximum recorded in T5 (NPK 50% + FYM 25% + Vermicompost 25%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave the maximum harvest index of 45.45%.

Treatment
T5 (NPK 50% + FYM 25% + Vermicompost 25%)e0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
45.45%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“harvest index (45.45%) was also maximum recorded in T5 (NPK 50% + FYM 25% + Vermicompost 25%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Radish”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–87 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend combined inorganic and organic fertilizer for radish growth and yield.

Outcome
combined application of inorganic and organic manure and fertilizers (NPK 50% + FYM 25% +Vermicompost 25%)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study suggested that the combined application of inorganic and organic manure and fertilizers (NPK 50% + FYM 25% +Vermicompost 25%) was highly beneficial for all the growth and yield parameters of radish.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1354 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Raphanus sativus (radish)Results differ

112 papers: 107 positive, 5 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

108 papers more in this group

See all 112 papers →

fertilization · growth · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 90 positive, 21 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.