Paper · 2023 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Mung Bean Nutrient Uptake and Root Response to Phosphorus and Potassium Placement Strategies

Kyin Kyin Htwe; Chris Guppy; Graeme Blair; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted to examine the effect of co-application of phosphorus (P) and/or potassium (K) fertilizer to a soil layer on Mung bean (Vigna radiata R. Wilczek) grown in a Yellow Chromosol soil. We hypothesized that adding K to a P- enriched soil layer would increase recovery of K due to increased root proliferation. Layers enriched with P, K or a combination of P and K were placed at either 5 or 20 cm depth in 50 cm deep pots, and a uniform PK application treatment included for comparison. Mung bean was grown for 45 days and key growth and nutrient uptake attributes were assessed. Phosphorus application increased shoot and root dry matter yield and shoot yield was 40% higher in the shallow P treatment and 77% higher in the shallow PK than in the uniform PK treatment. Shallow co-application of P and K increased shoot P and K content compared with shallow P alone. Apparent P fertilizer recovery (%PAFR) followed the same pattern, and there was an 8 to 12-fold increase in %KAFR. There was no evidence of an increase in either the proportion or mass density of roots in the enriched soil layers in any treatment. P and K fertilizer use efficiency was maximized by co-application in an enriched soil layer. When multiple nutrient deficiencies occur co-application of nutrients in a soil layer accessible to roots maximizes fertilizer use efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus application increased mung bean shoot and root dry matter yield.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Phosphorus applicatione0
Outcome
shoot and root dry matter yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus application increased shoot and root dry matter yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–669 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallow P gave 40% higher shoot yield than uniform PK.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
shallow P treatmente0
Outcome
shoot yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
40%e0
Comparator
uniform PK treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot yield was 40% higher in the shallow P treatment and 77% higher in the shallow PK than in the uniform PK treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallow PK gave 77% higher shoot yield than uniform PK.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
shallow PKe0
Outcome
shoot yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
77%e0
Comparator
uniform PK treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot yield was 40% higher in the shallow P treatment and 77% higher in the shallow PK than in the uniform PK treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallow P and K co-application increased mung bean shoot P and K content relative to shallow P alone.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Shallow co-application of P and Ke0
Outcome
shoot P and K contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
shallow P alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shallow co-application of P and K increased shoot P and K content compared with shallow P alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent P fertilizer recovery followed the pattern of shoot P and K content under shallow co-application.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Shallow co-application of P and Ke0
Outcome
Apparent P fertilizer recovery (%PAFR)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
shallow P alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shallow co-application of P and K increased shoot P and K content compared with shallow P alone. Apparent P fertilizer recovery (%PAFR) followed the same pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–956 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent K fertilizer recovery increased 8 to 12-fold.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
%KAFRe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
8 to 12-folde0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was an 8 to 12-fold increase in %KAFR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither root proportion nor mass density increased in enriched soil layers under any treatment.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
enriched soil layerse0
Outcome
proportion or mass density of rootse0
Direction
no evidence of an increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no evidence of an increase in either the proportion or mass density of roots in the enriched soil layers in any treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-application in an enriched soil layer maximized P and K fertilizer use efficiency.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
co-application in an enriched soil layere0
Outcome
P and K fertilizer use efficiencye0
Direction
maximizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P and K fertilizer use efficiency was maximized by co-application in an enriched soil layer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1231 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend co-applying nutrients in a root-accessible soil layer when multiple deficiencies occur.

Taxon
Mung BeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
co-application of nutrients in a soil layer accessible to rootse0
Qualifier
When multiple nutrient deficiencies occure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When multiple nutrient deficiencies occur co-application of nutrients in a soil layer accessible to roots maximizes fertilizer use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1374 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mung Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

179 papers: 175 positive, 4 negative or no effect

174 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

175 papers more in this group

See all 179 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 34 positive, 2 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

potassium · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.