Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Developing functional relationships between waterlogging and cotton growth and physiology-towards waterlogging modeling

Sahila Beegum; Van Truong; Raju Bheemanahalli; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cotton crop is known to be poorly adapted to waterlogging, especially during the early growth stages. Developing functional relationships between crop growth and development parameters and the duration of waterlogging is essential to develop or improve existing cotton crop models for simulating the impact of waterlogging. However, there are only limited experimental studies conducted on cotton specifically aimed at developing the necessary functional relationships required for waterlogging modeling. Further research is needed to understand the effects of waterlogging on cotton crops and improve modeling capabilities in this area. The current study aimed to conduct waterlogging experiments and develop functional relationships between waterlogging and cotton growth and physiology. The experiments were conducted in pots, and the waterlogging was initiated by plugging the drain hole at the bottom of the pot using a wooden peg. In the experiments, eight waterlogging treatments, including the control treatment, were imposed at the vegetative growth stage (15 days after sowing). Control treatment had zero days of water-logged condition; other treatments had 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14 days of waterlogging. It took five days to reach zero oxygen levels and one to two days to return to control after the treatment. After a total treatment duration of 14 days (30 days after sowing), the growth, physiological, reproductive, and nutrient analysis was conducted. All physiological parameters decreased with the number of days of waterlogging. Flavonoid and anthocyanin index increased with increased duration of waterlogging. Photosynthesis and whole plant dry weight in continuously waterlogged conditions were 75% and 78% less compared to 0, and 2-day water-logged plants. Plant height, stem diameter, number of main stem leaves, leaf area, and leaf length also decreased with waterlogging duration. When waterlogging duration increased, leaf, stem, and root macronutrients decreased, while micronutrients showed mixed trends. Based on the experimental study, functional relationships (linear, quadratic, and exponential decay) and waterlogging stress response indices are developed between growth and development parameters and the duration of waterlogging. This can serve as a base for developing or improving process-based cotton models to simulate the impact of waterlogging.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pot oxygen reached zero after five days of waterlogging.

Outcome
oxygen levelse0
Direction
zeroe0
Value
five dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“It took five days to reach zero oxygen levels and one to two days to return to control after the treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1324 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxygen returned to control levels one to two days after treatment.

Outcome
oxygen levelse0
Direction
return to controle0
Value
one to two dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“It took five days to reach zero oxygen levels and one to two days to return to control after the treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1324 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All physiological parameters decreased as waterlogging duration increased.

Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
physiological parameterse0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“All physiological parameters decreased with the number of days of waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1550 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flavonoid and anthocyanin index increased with waterlogging duration.

Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
Flavonoid and anthocyanin indexe0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“Flavonoid and anthocyanin index increased with increased duration of waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1633 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous waterlogging reduced cotton photosynthesis by 75% versus 0- and 2-day waterlogging.

Treatment
continuously waterlogged conditionse0
Outcome
Photosynthesise0
Direction
lesse0
Value
75%e0
Comparator
0, and 2-day water-logged plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“Photosynthesis and whole plant dry weight in continuously waterlogged conditions were 75% and 78% less compared to 0, and 2-day water-logged plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1635–1782 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous waterlogging reduced whole plant dry weight by 78% versus 0- and 2-day waterlogging.

Treatment
continuously waterlogged conditionse0
Outcome
whole plant dry weighte0
Direction
lesse0
Value
78%e0
Comparator
0, and 2-day water-logged plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“Photosynthesis and whole plant dry weight in continuously waterlogged conditions were 75% and 78% less compared to 0, and 2-day water-logged plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1635–1782 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height, stem diameter and main stem leaf number decreased with waterlogging duration.

Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
Plant height, stem diameter, number of main stem leavese0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plant height, stem diameter, number of main stem leaves, leaf area, and leaf length also decreased with waterlogging duration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1784–1909 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area and leaf length decreased with waterlogging duration.

Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
leaf area, and leaf lengthe0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plant height, stem diameter, number of main stem leaves, leaf area, and leaf length also decreased with waterlogging duration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1784–1909 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf, stem and root macronutrients decreased with longer waterlogging.

Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
leaf, stem, and root macronutrientse0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“When waterlogging duration increased, leaf, stem, and root macronutrients decreased, while micronutrients showed mixed trends”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1911–2036 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrients had mixed responses to waterlogging duration.

Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
micronutrientse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“When waterlogging duration increased, leaf, stem, and root macronutrients decreased, while micronutrients showed mixed trends”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1911–2036 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The study developed linear, quadratic and exponential response relationships and stress indices for cotton waterlogging.

Outcome
functional relationships (linear, quadratic, and exponential decay) and waterlogging stress response indicese0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cotton growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“functional relationships (linear, quadratic, and exponential decay) and waterlogging stress response indices are developed between growth and development parameters and the duration of waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2071–2268 · show in text ↑

flooding · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

25 papers: 5 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

flooding · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 2 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.