Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Effect of Nutrient Management on Growth, Yield, and Quality of Strawberry in Open Field Condition, and Study of Packaging Materials and Shelf Life of Strawberry after Harvesting

Harijana Ventakalakshmi; Poojitha Nagavalli; Devi Singh; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out during 2022-2023 to see the effect of Organic and Inorganic Sources on growth, yield and quality of strawberry cv. Winter dawn with 7+1 treatments with different combinations of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients (Vermicompost, FYM, and R.D.F.) replicated thrice with 3 plants per replication in Randomized Block Design. Observations were recorded for vegetative growth, fruit yield, quality. In different combinations (organic manure and inorganic manure) the treatment T5 (60% RDF+ 40% Vermicompost) recorded highest plant height, plant spread, number of leaves and flowers as compared to T0 (control). Plant treatment T5 (20% RDF+ 80% Vermicompost) registered earliest flowering and also highest number of flowers per plant. The maximum fruit weight, number of fruits per plant and yield were recorded with plants treated with T5 (60% RDF+ 40% Vermicompost) followed by T6 (40% RDF + 60% Vermicompost) at 90 DAP. Due to its lower production costs, T5's 20% RDF+ 80% Vermicompost had a higher benefit to cost ratio than T6's 40% RDF + 60% Vermicompost.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T5 (60% RDF + 40% vermicompost) gave the highest plant height and plant spread compared with the control.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Material
Winter dawne0
Treatment
60% RDF+ 40% Vermicomposte1
Outcome
plant height, plant spreade1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
T0 (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and quality of strawberry cv. Winter dawn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–161 · show in text ↑
e1

“the treatment T5 (60% RDF+ 40% Vermicompost) recorded highest plant height, plant spread, number of leaves and flowers as compared to T0 (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–646 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T5 (60% RDF + 40% vermicompost) gave the highest number of leaves and flowers compared with the control.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Material
Winter dawne0
Treatment
60% RDF+ 40% Vermicomposte1
Outcome
number of leaves and flowerse1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
T0 (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and quality of strawberry cv. Winter dawn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–161 · show in text ↑
e1

“the treatment T5 (60% RDF+ 40% Vermicompost) recorded highest plant height, plant spread, number of leaves and flowers as compared to T0 (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–646 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T5 (20% RDF + 80% vermicompost) gave the earliest flowering.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Material
Winter dawne0
Treatment
20% RDF+ 80% Vermicomposte2
Outcome
floweringe2
Direction
earlieste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and quality of strawberry cv. Winter dawn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–161 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plant treatment T5 (20% RDF+ 80% Vermicompost) registered earliest flowering and also highest number of flowers per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–769 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T5 (20% RDF + 80% vermicompost) gave the highest number of flowers per plant.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Material
Winter dawne0
Treatment
20% RDF+ 80% Vermicomposte2
Outcome
number of flowers per plante2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and quality of strawberry cv. Winter dawn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–161 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plant treatment T5 (20% RDF+ 80% Vermicompost) registered earliest flowering and also highest number of flowers per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–769 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T5 (60% RDF + 40% vermicompost) gave the maximum fruit weight, number of fruits per plant and yield at 90 DAP, followed by T6 (40% RDF + 60% vermicompost).

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Material
Winter dawne0
Treatment
60% RDF+ 40% Vermicomposte3
Outcome
fruit weight, number of fruits per plant and yielde3
Direction
maximume3
Qualifier
at 90 DAPe3
Comparator
40% RDF + 60% Vermicomposte3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and quality of strawberry cv. Winter dawn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–161 · show in text ↑
e3

“The maximum fruit weight, number of fruits per plant and yield were recorded with plants treated with T5 (60% RDF+ 40% Vermicompost) followed by T6 (40% RDF + 60% Vermicompost) at 90 DAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T5 (20% RDF + 80% vermicompost) had a higher benefit to cost ratio than T6 (40% RDF + 60% vermicompost) because of its lower production costs.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
20% RDF+ 80% Vermicomposte4
Outcome
benefit to cost ratioe4
Direction
highere4
Qualifier
lower production costse4
Comparator
40% RDF + 60% Vermicomposte4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and quality of strawberry cv. Winter dawn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 114–161 · show in text ↑
e4

“Due to its lower production costs, T5's 20% RDF+ 80% Vermicompost had a higher benefit to cost ratio than T6's 40% RDF + 60% Vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1096 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

141 papers: 117 positive, 24 negative or no effect

116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

fertilization · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

229 papers: 193 positive, 36 negative or no effect

192 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

225 papers more in this group

See all 229 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.