Paper · 2023 · Vegetable and Melon Growing

WINTER GARLIC BULB WEIGHT LOSS DURING STORAGE DEPENDS ON PROTECTIVE COATINGS

L. M. Pusik; V. K. Pusik

19
claims
39
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Purpose. To justify elements of the post-harvest winter garlic processing technology that will increase storability and shelf life of garlic. The working hypothesis was based on the assumption that it is possible to use a modified paraffin-containing coating, which will increase the stability of garlic bulbs during storage. Methods. General scientific: 1. hypothesis method - drawing up experimental designs; 2. experimental method – designs of laboratory experiments; 3. methods of analysis and synthesis - drawing conclusions and summarizing, computational and analytical. Results. Covering bulbs with a mixture of 90% shellac (food additive, E904) + 10% aloe vera gel ensured a storage length of 145 days with the daily weight loss of 0.036%. 20% sunflower wax increased the storage length up to 142 days with the daily weight loss of 0.036%, while with paraffin coating the storage period was 100 days and the daily weight loss was 0.10%. It was established that the control specimens of garlic stored at reduced relative air humidity (RAH) (60– 70%) significantly lost their weight. The increase in RAH during storage reduced the weight loss of garlic bulbs to 8.2%, i.e. 2.5-fold. Covering garlic bulbs with a protective film reduced the weight loss by 4.6–5 times at RAH of 60–70%. Increasing RAH to 75–85% and 90–95% reduced it by 4.7–5.3 and 2.9–3.1 times, respectively. With similar daily weight loss in the experiments with 75% paraffin + 5% glycerin + 20% sunflower wax, with 90% shellac + 10% aloe vera gel, with 85% paraffin + 5% glycerin + 10% sunflower wax, with 65% paraffin + 5% glycerin + 30% sunflower wax (the daily weight loss was 0.036%, 0.036%, 0.044%, and 0.044%, respectively), the storage lengths were not equal. Bulb coatings extended the storage period by 25-45 days depending on coating composition. The longest storage (142–145 days) was achieved with 75% paraffin + 5% glycerin + 20% sunflower wax and with 90% shellac + 10% aloe vera gel (the daily weight loss was 0.036%). Conclusions. The effects of the protective coatings on the bulb weight amounted to 76.0%, while the RAH contribution was 12.0%, and the interaction of the studied factors accounted for 12.0%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 90% shellac and 10% aloe vera gel coating gave 145 days of storage.

Taxon
WINTER GARLICAllium sativumt0
Treatment
90% shellac (food additive, E904) + 10% aloe vera gele0
Outcome
storage lengthe0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
145 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Covering bulbs with a mixture of 90% shellac (food additive, E904) + 10% aloe vera gel ensured a storage length of 145 days with the daily weight loss of 0.036%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER GARLIC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The shellac and aloe coating had daily weight loss of 0.036%.

Taxon
WINTER GARLICAllium sativumt0
Treatment
90% shellac (food additive, E904) + 10% aloe vera gele0
Outcome
daily weight losse0
Value
0.036%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Covering bulbs with a mixture of 90% shellac (food additive, E904) + 10% aloe vera gel ensured a storage length of 145 days with the daily weight loss of 0.036%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER GARLIC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 20% sunflower wax coating extended storage to 142 days.

Taxon
WINTER GARLICAllium sativumt0
Treatment
20% sunflower waxe0
Outcome
storage lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
142 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“20% sunflower wax increased the storage length up to 142 days with the daily weight loss of 0.036%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER GARLIC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sunflower wax coating had daily weight loss of 0.036%.

Taxon
WINTER GARLICAllium sativumt0
Treatment
20% sunflower waxe0
Outcome
daily weight losse0
Value
0.036%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“20% sunflower wax increased the storage length up to 142 days with the daily weight loss of 0.036%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER GARLIC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraffin coating gave a storage period of 100 days.

Taxon
WINTER GARLICAllium sativumt0
Treatment
paraffin coatinge0
Outcome
storage periode0
Value
100 dayse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with paraffin coating the storage period was 100 days and the daily weight loss was 0.10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER GARLIC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraffin coating had daily weight loss of 0.10%.

Taxon
WINTER GARLICAllium sativumt0
Treatment
paraffin coatinge0
Outcome
daily weight losse0
Value
0.10%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with paraffin coating the storage period was 100 days and the daily weight loss was 0.10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER GARLIC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic controls lost significant weight under 60–70% relative humidity.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Outcome
lost their weighte0
Direction
loste0
Qualifier
60– 70%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control specimens of garlic stored at reduced relative air humidity (RAH) (60– 70%) significantly lost their weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1088 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing relative humidity reduced garlic bulb weight loss to 8.2%.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Treatment
increase in RAHe0
Outcome
weight loss of garlic bulbse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
8.2%e0
Qualifier
2.5-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in RAH during storage reduced the weight loss of garlic bulbs to 8.2%, i.e. 2.5-fold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protective film reduced weight loss 4.6–5 times at 60–70% relative humidity.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Treatment
protective filme0
Outcome
weight losse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
4.6–5 timese0
Qualifier
RAH of 60–70%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Covering garlic bulbs with a protective film reduced the weight loss by 4.6–5 times at RAH of 60–70%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative humidity of 75–85% reduced bulb weight loss 4.7–5.3 times.

Taxon
WINTER GARLICAllium sativumt0
Treatment
RAH to 75–85%e0
Outcome
weight losse1
Direction
reducede0
Value
4.7–5.3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing RAH to 75–85% and 90–95% reduced it by 4.7–5.3 and 2.9–3.1 times, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1380 · show in text ↑
e1

“reduced the weight loss by 4.6–5 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER GARLIC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative humidity of 90–95% reduced bulb weight loss 2.9–3.1 times.

Taxon
WINTER GARLICAllium sativumt0
Treatment
90–95%e0
Outcome
weight losse1
Direction
reducede0
Value
2.9–3.1 timese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing RAH to 75–85% and 90–95% reduced it by 4.7–5.3 and 2.9–3.1 times, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1380 · show in text ↑
e1

“reduced the weight loss by 4.6–5 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER GARLIC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% paraffin, 5% glycerin, 20% sunflower wax coating had 0.036% daily weight loss.

Taxon
WINTER GARLICAllium sativumt0
Treatment
75% paraffin + 5% glycerin + 20% sunflower waxe0
Outcome
daily weight losse0
Value
0.036%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“75% paraffin + 5% glycerin + 20% sunflower wax, with 90% shellac + 10% aloe vera gel, with 85% paraffin + 5% glycerin + 10% sunflower wax, with 65% paraffin + 5% glycerin + 30% sunflower wax (the daily weight loss was 0.036%, 0.036%, 0.044%, and 0.044%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1704 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER GARLIC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 85% paraffin, 5% glycerin, 10% sunflower wax coating had 0.044% daily weight loss.

Taxon
WINTER GARLICAllium sativumt0
Treatment
85% paraffin + 5% glycerin + 10% sunflower waxe0
Outcome
daily weight losse0
Value
0.044%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“85% paraffin + 5% glycerin + 10% sunflower wax, with 65% paraffin + 5% glycerin + 30% sunflower wax (the daily weight loss was 0.036%, 0.036%, 0.044%, and 0.044%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1704 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER GARLIC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 65% paraffin, 5% glycerin, 30% sunflower wax coating had 0.044% daily weight loss.

Taxon
WINTER GARLICAllium sativumt0
Treatment
65% paraffin + 5% glycerin + 30% sunflower waxe0
Outcome
daily weight losse0
Value
0.044%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“65% paraffin + 5% glycerin + 30% sunflower wax (the daily weight loss was 0.036%, 0.036%, 0.044%, and 0.044%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1704 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER GARLIC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coatings extended storage by 25–45 days depending on composition.

Taxon
WINTER GARLICAllium sativumt0
Treatment
Bulb coatingse0
Outcome
storage periode0
Direction
extendede0
Value
25-45 dayse0
Qualifier
depending on coating compositione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bulb coatings extended the storage period by 25-45 days depending on coating composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1742–1830 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER GARLIC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% paraffin, 5% glycerin, 20% sunflower wax coating was among the longest storage treatments at 142–145 days.

Taxon
WINTER GARLICAllium sativumt0
Treatment
75% paraffin + 5% glycerin + 20% sunflower waxe0
Outcome
longest storagee0
Direction
longeste0
Value
142–145 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The longest storage (142–145 days) was achieved with 75% paraffin + 5% glycerin + 20% sunflower wax and with 90% shellac + 10% aloe vera gel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1832–1972 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER GARLIC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protective coatings explained 76.0% of the effect on bulb weight.

Taxon
WINTER GARLICAllium sativumt0
Treatment
protective coatingse0
Outcome
bulb weighte0
Value
76.0%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of the protective coatings on the bulb weight amounted to 76.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2022–2097 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER GARLIC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative humidity contributed 12.0% to bulb weight variation.

Taxon
WINTER GARLICAllium sativumt0
Treatment
RAHe0
Outcome
bulb weighte1
Value
12.0%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the RAH contribution was 12.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2105–2135 · show in text ↑
e1

“the bulb weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2064–2079 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER GARLIC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The coating and humidity interaction contributed 12.0%.

Taxon
WINTER GARLICAllium sativumt0
Treatment
studied factorse0
Outcome
bulb weighte1
Value
12.0%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the interaction of the studied factors accounted for 12.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2141–2199 · show in text ↑
e1

“the bulb weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2064–2079 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER GARLIC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13 · show in text ↑

humidity · quality: postharvest · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.