Paper · 2023 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Can foliar application of zinc increased growth, physiology, and yield in snap beans?

Rilner Alves Flores; Maxuel Xavier; Karen Viçosi; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study aimed to verify the effects of leaf application of zinc (Zn) on the growth, physiology, yield, and biofortification of snap beans. The experiment was carried out in a greenhouse, in a completely randomized design, with five doses of zinc (0, 100, 200, 300, and 400 mg L−1). The leaf application of zinc was carried out at the vegetative stage V3 (third leaves). Biometric, physiological, and yield evaluations occurred at stages R5 (flowering) and R8 (harvest). The chlorophyll of plants with zinc is 36% higher with the application of 400 mg L−1 in R8. Foliar fertilization reduced the transpiration around 41%; and it increased the temperature and photosynthetic rate at 5.2% and 16.2%, respectively. The zinc concentration increases up resulted in an increase of 85 and 942% of zinc accumulation in the snap bean plant at the R5 stage. The 100 mg L−1 dose increased crop yield by 8.4% compared to the control treatment. Higher doses can reduce productivity by up to 17% when 400 mg L−1 of Zn is applied. Foliar application of zinc is efficient in promoting an increase in the concentration and accumulation of Zn in the leaves in the stage R5, but at the harvest stage there is no influence of fertilization on the levels and accumulations of zinc in the plant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of 400 mg L−1 zinc raised chlorophyll by 36% at R8.

Taxon
snap beanst0
Organ / stage
R8e0
Treatment
application of 400 mg L−1e0
Outcome
chlorophylle0
Direction
highere0
Value
36%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“snap beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“The chlorophyll of plants with zinc is 36% higher with the application of 400 mg L−1 in R8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilization reduced transpiration by about 41%.

Taxon
snap beanst0
Treatment
Foliar fertilizatione1
Outcome
transpiratione1
Direction
reducede1
Value
41%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“snap beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Foliar fertilization reduced the transpiration around 41%; and it increased the temperature and photosynthetic rate at 5.2% and 16.2%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilization increased leaf temperature by 5.2%.

Taxon
snap beanst0
Treatment
Foliar fertilizatione1
Outcome
temperaturee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
5.2%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“snap beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Foliar fertilization reduced the transpiration around 41%; and it increased the temperature and photosynthetic rate at 5.2% and 16.2%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilization increased photosynthetic rate by 16.2%.

Taxon
snap beanst0
Treatment
Foliar fertilizatione1
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
16.2%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“snap beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Foliar fertilization reduced the transpiration around 41%; and it increased the temperature and photosynthetic rate at 5.2% and 16.2%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc concentration increases raised zinc accumulation in the snap bean plant by 85 and 942% at the R5 stage.

Taxon
snap beanst0
Organ / stage
R5 stagee2
Treatment
zinc concentratione2
Outcome
zinc accumulatione2
Direction
increasee2
Value
85 and 942%e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“snap beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
e2

“The zinc concentration increases up resulted in an increase of 85 and 942% of zinc accumulation in the snap bean plant at the R5 stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–848 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100 mg L−1 zinc dose increased crop yield by 8.4% compared with the control.

Taxon
snap beanst0
Treatment
100 mg L−1e3
Outcome
crop yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Value
8.4%e3
Comparator
control treatmente3

Verbatim

t0

“snap beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
e3

“The 100 mg L−1 dose increased crop yield by 8.4% compared to the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–932 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc at 400 mg L−1 reduced productivity by up to 17%.

Taxon
snap beanst0
Treatment
400 mg L−1e4
Outcome
productivitye4
Direction
reducee4
Value
up to 17%e4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“snap beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
e4

“Higher doses can reduce productivity by up to 17% when 400 mg L−1 of Zn is applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1016 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest, fertilization had no influence on the levels and accumulations of zinc in the plant.

Taxon
snap beanst0
Organ / stage
harvest stagee5
Treatment
fertilizatione5
Outcome
levels and accumulations of zince5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“snap beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–84 · show in text ↑
e5

“at the harvest stage there is no influence of fertilization on the levels and accumulations of zinc in the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1274 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

application · physiology: gas exchange · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · physiology: photosynthesis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

application · physiology: photosynthesis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 17 positive, 4 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 52 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

fertilization · physiology: gas exchange · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.