Paper · 2023 · Pollution Research

EFFECT OF FLY ASH, LIME AND CHEMICAL FERTILIZERS ON SOIL PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES AND GROWTH OF LENTIL

TUSARKANTA BEHERA; ANAND PRAKASH SINGH; ADITI CHOURASIA; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Fly ash (FA), a byproduct of coal combustion in thermal power plants, has been considered as a problematic solid waste and its safe disposal is a cause of concern.Several studies proposed that FA can be used as a soil additive; however, its effect on physico chemical properties of soil and growth of lentil (cv.Malviya Viswanath) to fly ash (FA) application in conjunction with lime and chemical fertilizers was studied in a pot experiment during winter 2020 in acid soil of Rajgarh block.Application of fly ash at higher dose in combination with lime amended the acidic condition of soil, whereas increased the salt concentration in soil.At higher level, when fly ash was applied to soil, it improved the physical properties of soil but declined the organic carbon content in soil.The application of fly ash @ 80% FD in conjunction with lime @ 20%LD and 100% RDF was more beneficial for the growth performance of lentil than the unamended soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher-dose fly ash with lime ameliorated soil acidity.

Taxon
LENTILLens culinarist0
Treatment
fly ash at higher dose in combination with limee0
Outcome
acidic condition of soile0
Direction
amendede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of fly ash at higher dose in combination with lime amended the acidic condition of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“GROWTH OF LENTIL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher-dose fly ash with lime increased soil salt concentration.

Taxon
LENTILLens culinarist0
Treatment
fly ash at higher dose in combination with limee1
Outcome
salt concentration in soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas increased the salt concentration in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“FLY ASH, LIME AND CHEMICAL FERTILIZERS ON SOIL PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES AND GROWTH OF LENTIL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of fly ash at higher dose in combination with lime amended the acidic condition of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher fly ash application improved soil physical properties.

Taxon
LENTILLens culinarist0
Treatment
fly ashe0
Outcome
physical properties of soile0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At higher level, when fly ash was applied to soil, it improved the physical properties of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–734 · show in text ↑
t0

“GROWTH OF LENTIL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher fly ash application reduced soil organic carbon.

Taxon
LENTILLens culinarist0
Treatment
fly asht0
Outcome
organic carbon content in soile0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“declined the organic carbon content in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–782 · show in text ↑
t0

“FLY ASH, LIME AND CHEMICAL FERTILIZERS ON SOIL PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES AND GROWTH OF LENTIL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fly ash at 80% FD with lime at 20% LD and 100% RDF benefited lentil growth relative to unamended soil.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
fly ash @ 80% FD in conjunction with lime @ 20%LD and 100% RDFe0
Outcome
growth performancee0
Direction
more beneficiale0
Comparator
unamended soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of fly ash @ 80% FD in conjunction with lime @ 20%LD and 100% RDF was more beneficial for the growth performance of lentil than the unamended soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–945 · show in text ↑

lime · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.