Abstract
A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the performance of sweet blue Lupin intercropped with maize at different planting time under irrigation in Ethiopia. For the experiment, sweet lupin (cultivar Sanabor) and Maize (cultivar PBH 3253) were used. The experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with four replications. The treatments were sweet lupin intercropped with maize simultaneously, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 weeks after maize planting. Sole maize was planted as control. Maize was planted in rows with spacing of 75 cm and 30 cm between rows and between plants, respectively. Lupin was planted between two maize rows (one maize row: two lupin row) 22.5 cm apart from maize row. The distance between lupin plants is 7 cm. In addition, maize rows were top-dressed N-fertilizer at the rate of 100 Kg ha-1 by dividing in to two at planting and at vegetative stage. Intercropping time had a significant effect on yield and yield components of sweet lupin, but not on maize. Lupin intercropped simultaneous with maize gave significantly higher dry matter and seed yield 1.05 and 1.71t/ha, respectively as compared to the four intercropping dates. Maize grain yield and maize stover yield were not affected by sweet lupin intercropping dates. This study showed that sweet lupin intercropped simultaneously with maize could be optimum sowing date for better grain and dry matter yield of sweet lupin without affecting maize grain and stover yield under irrigation condition.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping time significantly affected sweet lupin yield and yield components.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“Intercropping time had a significant effect on yield and yield components of sweet lupin”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping time did not significantly affect maize yield and yield components.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“but not on maize”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.)”
e1“Intercropping time had a significant effect on yield and yield components of sweet lupin, but not on maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Simultaneous intercropping gave higher sweet lupin dry matter yield of 1.05 t/ha than later sowing.
- Treatment
- intercropped simultaneous with maizee0
- Outcome
- dry mattere0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.05e0
- Comparator
- the four intercropping datese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Lupin intercropped simultaneous with maize gave significantly higher dry matter and seed yield 1.05 and 1.71t/ha, respectively as compared to the four intercropping dates”
Claim · model-written summary
Simultaneous intercropping gave higher sweet lupin seed yield of 1.71t/ha than later sowing.
- Treatment
- intercropped simultaneous with maizee0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.71t/hae0
- Comparator
- the four intercropping datese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Lupin intercropped simultaneous with maize gave significantly higher dry matter and seed yield 1.05 and 1.71t/ha, respectively as compared to the four intercropping dates”
Claim · model-written summary
Lupin intercropping dates did not affect maize grain or stover yield.
- Treatment
- sweet lupin intercropping datese0
- Outcome
- Maize grain yield and maize stover yielde0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Maize grain yield and maize stover yield were not affected by sweet lupin intercropping dates”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors identify simultaneous lupin and maize intercropping as the optimum sowing date under irrigation.
Verbatim
e0“sweet lupin intercropped simultaneously with maize could be optimum sowing date for better grain and dry matter yield of sweet lupin without affecting maize grain and stover yield under irrigation condition”
The same questions in other papers
intercropping · growth · LupinusPositive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
intercropping · yield · LupinusPositive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
220 papers in the same direction as this paper · 613 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
830 papers more in this group
See all 834 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.