Paper · 2023 · Food Chemistry Advances

Impact of conventional and ohmic blanching on color, phytochemical, structural, and sensory properties of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cubes: A comparative analysis

Aparajita Priyadarshini; Kalpana Rayaguru; Achyuta Kumar Biswal; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
29
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Innovative food-preserving methods are developing with the demand for delicious and healthy foods. The current work investigates the preservation of raw Totapuri mango slices of 1 cube cm dimension through conventional blanching (CB) and ohmic blanching (OB). The peroxidase test identified the precise blanching times. The CB performed by boiling mango cubes at 90 °C in a hot water bath took 130 s, whereas OB took 40–110 s depending on the voltage gradients. The color parameters of the samples and the nature of inherent bioactive compounds remained intact in both conventional and ohmic blanching treatments. However, the blanching reduced the amounts of bioactive compounds. The CB reduced these contents to a greater extent than OB with the minimum effect at 20 V/cm due to non-uniform thermal effects in the former. The morphology was severely affected by CB treatment compared to OB treatment as evidenced by SEM image analyses. The DPPH scavenging activity at 20 V/cm was the highest among all blanched samples. Thus, the OB is preferable to CB for preserving the mango cubes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional blanching required 130 s while ohmic blanching required 40–110 s.

Taxon
mango (Mangifera indica L.)Mangifera indicat0
Outcome
CBe0
Value
130 se0
Comparator
OBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The CB performed by boiling mango cubes at 90 °C in a hot water bath took 130 s, whereas OB took 40–110 s depending on the voltage gradients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–461 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Color parameters and the nature of bioactive compounds remained intact under both blanching methods.

Taxon
mango (Mangifera indica L.)Mangifera indicat0
Treatment
conventional and ohmic blanching treatmentse0
Outcome
color parameters of the samples and the nature of inherent bioactive compoundse0
Direction
remained intacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The color parameters of the samples and the nature of inherent bioactive compounds remained intact in both conventional and ohmic blanching treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–613 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blanching reduced bioactive compound amounts.

Taxon
mango (Mangifera indica L.)Mangifera indicat0
Treatment
blanchinge0
Outcome
amounts of bioactive compoundse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the blanching reduced the amounts of bioactive compounds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–680 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional blanching reduced bioactive contents more than ohmic blanching.

Taxon
mango (Mangifera indica L.)Mangifera indicat0
Treatment
CBe0
Outcome
these contentse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
OBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The CB reduced these contents to a greater extent than OB with the minimum effect at 20 V/cm due to non-uniform thermal effects in the former.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ohmic blanching at 20 V/cm had the minimum effect on bioactive content.

Taxon
mango (Mangifera indica L.)Mangifera indicat0
Treatment
20 V/cme0
Outcome
these contentse0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
CBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The CB reduced these contents to a greater extent than OB with the minimum effect at 20 V/cm due to non-uniform thermal effects in the former.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional blanching affected cube morphology more severely than ohmic blanching.

Taxon
mango (Mangifera indica L.)Mangifera indicat0
Treatment
CB treatmente0
Outcome
morphologye0
Direction
severely affectede0
Comparator
OB treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The morphology was severely affected by CB treatment compared to OB treatment as evidenced by SEM image analyses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DPPH scavenging activity at 20 V/cm was highest among blanched samples.

Taxon
mango (Mangifera indica L.)Mangifera indicat0
Treatment
20 V/cme0
Outcome
DPPH scavenging activitye0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
all blanched samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The DPPH scavenging activity at 20 V/cm was the highest among all blanched samples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–133 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors prefer ohmic blanching for preserving mango cubes.

Taxon
mango (Mangifera indica L.)Mangifera indicat0
Outcome
OB is preferable to CB for preserving the mango cubese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thus, the OB is preferable to CB for preserving the mango cubes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–133 · show in text ↑

processing · growth · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

processing · quality: phytochemicals · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.