Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Pruning Height on Growth Parameters of Mulberry and Rearing Performance of PM X CSR2 Silkworm Cross Breed

C. Lavanya; R. N. Bhaskar

11
claims
33
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Sericulture is one of the most promising agricultural crops in India and played a vital role in increasing the income of the farmers, the present experiment was conducted at Department of Sericulture, UAS, GKVK, Bengaluru during the year 2020-21 by introducing different pruning techniques to the V-1 mulberry variety. For this study six treatments were laid out in RCBD with four replications. The results revealed that, mulberry pruned at 150 cm above the ground level was recorded highest shoot height (95.60 cm), number of shoots (23.35), number of leaves (162.35) and leaf yield (479.25 g/ plant) per plant at 60 days after pruning (DAP). Further, the leaf harvested from V-1 mulberry and fed to PM × CSR2 silkworm hybrid, revealed maximum V instar fifth day larval weight of 19.77 g/10, effective rate of rearing (ERR %, (98.50 %)), spinning percentage (97.75 %), silk productivity (cg/day) (2.24), cocoon weight (7.46 g/5 cocoon), shell weight (1.26 g/5), shell ratio (17.32 %), were in 30cm above the ground level pruned treatment followed by 45 cm above the ground level. As the pruning height increased, from 30-150 cm the cocoon parameters were decreased.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning at 150 cm produced the highest shoot height of 95.60 cm at 60 days.

Taxon
mulberryt0
Treatment
pruned at 150 cm above the ground levele1
Outcome
shoot heighte0
Direction
higheste1
Value
95.60 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“shoot height (95.60 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–515 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results revealed that, mulberry pruned at 150 cm above the ground level was recorded highest shoot height (95.60 cm), number of shoots (23.35), number of leaves (162.35) and leaf yield (479.25 g/ plant) per plant at 60 days after pruning (DAP).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning at 150 cm produced the highest number of shoots of 23.35 at 60 days.

Taxon
mulberryt0
Treatment
pruned at 150 cm above the ground levele1
Outcome
number of shootse0
Direction
higheste1
Value
23.35e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“number of shoots (23.35)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results revealed that, mulberry pruned at 150 cm above the ground level was recorded highest shoot height (95.60 cm), number of shoots (23.35), number of leaves (162.35) and leaf yield (479.25 g/ plant) per plant at 60 days after pruning (DAP).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning at 150 cm produced the highest number of leaves of 162.35 at 60 days.

Taxon
mulberryt0
Treatment
pruned at 150 cm above the ground levele1
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
higheste1
Value
162.35e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“number of leaves (162.35)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–568 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results revealed that, mulberry pruned at 150 cm above the ground level was recorded highest shoot height (95.60 cm), number of shoots (23.35), number of leaves (162.35) and leaf yield (479.25 g/ plant) per plant at 60 days after pruning (DAP).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning at 150 cm produced the highest leaf yield of 479.25 g/ plant at 60 days.

Taxon
mulberryt0
Treatment
pruned at 150 cm above the ground levele1
Outcome
leaf yielde0
Direction
higheste1
Value
479.25 g/ plante0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“leaf yield (479.25 g/ plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–601 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results revealed that, mulberry pruned at 150 cm above the ground level was recorded highest shoot height (95.60 cm), number of shoots (23.35), number of leaves (162.35) and leaf yield (479.25 g/ plant) per plant at 60 days after pruning (DAP).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves from the 30 cm pruning treatment yielded maximum silkworm larval weight of 19.77 g/10.

Taxon
mulberryt0
Treatment
30cm above the ground level pruned treatmente1
Interactor
PM × CSR2 silkworm hybride1herbivore
Outcome
larval weighte0
Direction
maximume1
Value
19.77 g/10e0
Comparator
45 cm above the ground levele1

Verbatim

e0

“larval weight of 19.77 g/10”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“Further, the leaf harvested from V-1 mulberry and fed to PM × CSR2 silkworm hybrid, revealed maximum V instar fifth day larval weight of 19.77 g/10, effective rate of rearing (ERR %, (98.50 %)), spinning percentage (97.75 %), silk productivity (cg/day) (2.24), cocoon weight (7.46 g/5 cocoon), shell weight (1.26 g/5), shell ratio (17.32 %), were in 30cm above the ground level pruned treatment followed by 45 cm above the ground level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves from the 30 cm pruning treatment yielded maximum silkworm effective rate of rearing of 98.50 %.

Taxon
mulberryt0
Treatment
30cm above the ground level pruned treatmente1
Interactor
PM × CSR2 silkworm hybride1herbivore
Outcome
effective rate of rearinge0
Direction
maximume1
Value
98.50 %e0
Comparator
45 cm above the ground levele1

Verbatim

e0

“effective rate of rearing (ERR %, (98.50 %))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“Further, the leaf harvested from V-1 mulberry and fed to PM × CSR2 silkworm hybrid, revealed maximum V instar fifth day larval weight of 19.77 g/10, effective rate of rearing (ERR %, (98.50 %)), spinning percentage (97.75 %), silk productivity (cg/day) (2.24), cocoon weight (7.46 g/5 cocoon), shell weight (1.26 g/5), shell ratio (17.32 %), were in 30cm above the ground level pruned treatment followed by 45 cm above the ground level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves from the 30 cm pruning treatment yielded maximum silkworm spinning percentage of 97.75 %.

Taxon
mulberryt0
Treatment
30cm above the ground level pruned treatmente1
Interactor
PM × CSR2 silkworm hybride1herbivore
Outcome
spinning percentagee0
Direction
maximume1
Value
97.75 %e0
Comparator
45 cm above the ground levele1

Verbatim

e0

“spinning percentage (97.75 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“Further, the leaf harvested from V-1 mulberry and fed to PM × CSR2 silkworm hybrid, revealed maximum V instar fifth day larval weight of 19.77 g/10, effective rate of rearing (ERR %, (98.50 %)), spinning percentage (97.75 %), silk productivity (cg/day) (2.24), cocoon weight (7.46 g/5 cocoon), shell weight (1.26 g/5), shell ratio (17.32 %), were in 30cm above the ground level pruned treatment followed by 45 cm above the ground level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves from the 30 cm pruning treatment yielded maximum silkworm silk productivity of 2.24.

Taxon
mulberryt0
Treatment
30cm above the ground level pruned treatmente1
Interactor
PM × CSR2 silkworm hybride1herbivore
Outcome
silk productivitye0
Direction
maximume1
Value
2.24e0
Comparator
45 cm above the ground levele1

Verbatim

e0

“silk productivity (cg/day) (2.24)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“Further, the leaf harvested from V-1 mulberry and fed to PM × CSR2 silkworm hybrid, revealed maximum V instar fifth day larval weight of 19.77 g/10, effective rate of rearing (ERR %, (98.50 %)), spinning percentage (97.75 %), silk productivity (cg/day) (2.24), cocoon weight (7.46 g/5 cocoon), shell weight (1.26 g/5), shell ratio (17.32 %), were in 30cm above the ground level pruned treatment followed by 45 cm above the ground level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves from the 30 cm pruning treatment yielded maximum silkworm cocoon weight of 7.46 g/5 cocoon.

Taxon
mulberryt0
Treatment
30cm above the ground level pruned treatmente1
Interactor
PM × CSR2 silkworm hybride1herbivore
Outcome
cocoon weighte0
Direction
maximume1
Value
7.46 g/5 cocoone0
Comparator
45 cm above the ground levele1

Verbatim

e0

“cocoon weight (7.46 g/5 cocoon)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“Further, the leaf harvested from V-1 mulberry and fed to PM × CSR2 silkworm hybrid, revealed maximum V instar fifth day larval weight of 19.77 g/10, effective rate of rearing (ERR %, (98.50 %)), spinning percentage (97.75 %), silk productivity (cg/day) (2.24), cocoon weight (7.46 g/5 cocoon), shell weight (1.26 g/5), shell ratio (17.32 %), were in 30cm above the ground level pruned treatment followed by 45 cm above the ground level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves from the 30 cm pruning treatment yielded maximum silkworm shell weight of 1.26 g/5.

Taxon
mulberryt0
Treatment
30cm above the ground level pruned treatmente1
Interactor
PM × CSR2 silkworm hybride1herbivore
Outcome
shell weighte0
Direction
maximume1
Value
1.26 g/5e0
Comparator
45 cm above the ground levele1

Verbatim

e0

“shell weight (1.26 g/5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“Further, the leaf harvested from V-1 mulberry and fed to PM × CSR2 silkworm hybrid, revealed maximum V instar fifth day larval weight of 19.77 g/10, effective rate of rearing (ERR %, (98.50 %)), spinning percentage (97.75 %), silk productivity (cg/day) (2.24), cocoon weight (7.46 g/5 cocoon), shell weight (1.26 g/5), shell ratio (17.32 %), were in 30cm above the ground level pruned treatment followed by 45 cm above the ground level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves from the 30 cm pruning treatment yielded maximum silkworm shell ratio of 17.32 %.

Taxon
mulberryt0
Treatment
30cm above the ground level pruned treatmente1
Interactor
PM × CSR2 silkworm hybride1herbivore
Outcome
shell ratioe0
Direction
maximume1
Value
17.32 %e0
Comparator
45 cm above the ground levele1

Verbatim

e0

“shell ratio (17.32 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mulberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“Further, the leaf harvested from V-1 mulberry and fed to PM × CSR2 silkworm hybrid, revealed maximum V instar fifth day larval weight of 19.77 g/10, effective rate of rearing (ERR %, (98.50 %)), spinning percentage (97.75 %), silk productivity (cg/day) (2.24), cocoon weight (7.46 g/5 cocoon), shell weight (1.26 g/5), shell ratio (17.32 %), were in 30cm above the ground level pruned treatment followed by 45 cm above the ground level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–1080 · show in text ↑

pruning · growth · Morus (mulberry trees)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

pruning · yield · Morus (mulberry trees)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.