Paper · 2023 · Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca

Salinity stress amelioration and morpho-physiological growth stimulation by silicon priming and biochar supplementation in Chenopodium quinoa

Awatif M. ABDULMAJEED

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effect of silicon (Si) priming and soil amendment with biochar (BC) was analysed in Chenopodium quinoa under normal and salinity stressed conditions. Reduced growth parameters, chlorophyll content, and photosynthesis under salinity stress were significantly ameliorated by Si priming and soil amendment with BC. Applied Si and BC treatment also enhanced the chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, net photosynthesis, and maximal photochemical efficiency. In addition to this, Si and/or BC amendments alleviated the oxidative damage by reducing the generation of toxic reactive oxygen species including hydrogen peroxide and superoxide. Moreover, the activities of antioxidant enzymes and the content of ascorbate and glutathione increased significantly in Si and BC treated plants reflecting efficient alleviation of oxidative damage. Besides, the content of compatible osmolytes was increased in Si and/or BC treated seedlings, thereby contributing to improved growth and salinity tolerance by maintaining higher leaf water potential and water use efficiency. Si and BC treatment increased the uptake of key mineral elements. Moreover, salinity induced decline in the nutritional components of seeds of C. quinoa were considerably increased under Si and BC treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon priming and biochar significantly ameliorated salinity reductions in growth parameters, chlorophyll and photosynthesis.

Taxon
Chenopodium quinoaChenopodium quinoat0
Treatment
Si priming and soil amendment with BCe0
Outcome
growth parameters, chlorophyll content, and photosynthesise0
Direction
amelioratede0
Comparator
salinity stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced growth parameters, chlorophyll content, and photosynthesis under salinity stress were significantly ameliorated by Si priming and soil amendment with BC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–314 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chenopodium quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon and biochar enhanced chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate.

Taxon
Chenopodium quinoaChenopodium quinoat0
Treatment
Si and BC treatmente0
Outcome
chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, transpiration ratee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applied Si and BC treatment also enhanced the chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, net photosynthesis, and maximal photochemical efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chenopodium quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon and biochar enhanced net photosynthesis and maximal photochemical efficiency.

Taxon
Chenopodium quinoaChenopodium quinoat0
Treatment
Si and BC treatmente0
Outcome
net photosynthesis, and maximal photochemical efficiencye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applied Si and BC treatment also enhanced the chlorophyll content, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, net photosynthesis, and maximal photochemical efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chenopodium quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon or biochar reduced hydrogen peroxide and superoxide generation.

Taxon
Chenopodium quinoaChenopodium quinoat0
Treatment
Si and/or BC amendmentse0
Outcome
generation of toxic reactive oxygen species including hydrogen peroxide and superoxidee0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Si and/or BC amendments alleviated the oxidative damage by reducing the generation of toxic reactive oxygen species including hydrogen peroxide and superoxide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–662 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chenopodium quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon and biochar significantly increased antioxidant enzyme activities and ascorbate and glutathione content.

Taxon
Chenopodium quinoaChenopodium quinoat0
Treatment
Si and BCe0
Outcome
activities of antioxidant enzymes and the content of ascorbate and glutathionee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the activities of antioxidant enzymes and the content of ascorbate and glutathione increased significantly in Si and BC treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–808 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chenopodium quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon or biochar increased compatible osmolyte content in seedlings.

Taxon
Chenopodium quinoaChenopodium quinoat0
Organ / stage
seedlingse0
Treatment
Si and/or BCe0
Outcome
content of compatible osmolytese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the content of compatible osmolytes was increased in Si and/or BC treated seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–955 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chenopodium quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon or biochar maintained higher leaf water potential and water use efficiency.

Taxon
Chenopodium quinoaChenopodium quinoat0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
Si and/or BCe1
Outcome
leaf water potential and water use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maintaining higher leaf water potential and water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1087 · show in text ↑
e1

“Si and/or BC treated seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–955 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chenopodium quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon and biochar increased uptake of key mineral elements.

Taxon
Chenopodium quinoaChenopodium quinoat0
Treatment
Si and BC treatmente0
Outcome
uptake of key mineral elementse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Si and BC treatment increased the uptake of key mineral elements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chenopodium quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon and biochar increased seed nutritional components that had declined under salinity.

Taxon
C. quinoaChenopodium quinoae0
Organ / stage
seedse0
Treatment
Si and BC treatmentse0
Outcome
nutritional components of seedse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
salinity induced declinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity induced decline in the nutritional components of seeds of C. quinoa were considerably increased under Si and BC treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1296 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: gas exchange · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: oxidative · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silicon atom · nutrient: content · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · physiology: oxidative · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

biochar · nutrient: content · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

seed treatment · physiology: photosynthesis · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.