Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences

UV-C Seed Surface Sterilization and Fe, Zn, Mg, Cr Biofortification of Wheat Sprouts as an Effective Strategy of Bioelement Supplementation

Katarzyna Czarnek; Małgorzata Tatarczak-Michalewska; Piotr Dreher; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Metalloenzymes play an important role in the regulation of many biological functions. An effective way to prevent deficiencies of essential minerals in human diets is the biofortification of plant materials. The process of enriching crop sprouts under hydroponic conditions is the easiest and cheapest to conduct and control. In this study, the sprouts of the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties Arkadia and Tonacja underwent biofortification with Fe, Zn, Mg, and Cr solutions in hydroponic media at four concentrations (0, 50, 100, and 200 µg g−1) over four and seven days. Moreover, this study is the first to combine sprout biofortification with UV-C (λ = 254 nm) radiation treatment for seed surface sterilization. The results showed that UV-C radiation was effective in suppressing seed germination contamination by microorganisms. The seed germination energy was slightly affected by UV-C radiation but remained at a high level (79–95%). The influence of this non-chemical sterilization process on seeds was tested in an innovative manner using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and EXAKT thin-section cutting. The applied sterilization process reduced neither the growth and development of sprouts nor nutrient bioassimilation. In general, wheat sprouts easily accumulate Fe, Zn, Mg, and Cr during the applied growth period. A very strong correlation between the ion concentration in the media and microelement assimilation in the plant tissues (R2 > 0.9) was detected. The results of the quantitative ion assays performed with atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) using the flame atomization method were correlated with the morphological evaluation of sprouts in order to determine the optimum concentration of individual elements in the hydroponic solution. The best conditions were indicated for 7-day cultivation in 100 µg g−1 of solutions with Fe (218% and 322% better nutrient accumulation in comparison to the control condition) and Zn (19 and 29 times richer in zinc concentration compared to the sprouts without supplementation). The maximum plant product biofortification with magnesium did not exceed 40% in intensity compared to the control sample. The best-developed sprouts were grown in the solution with 50 µg g−1 of Cr. In contrast, the concentration of 200 µg g−1 was clearly toxic to the wheat sprouts.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C radiation was effective in suppressing seed germination contamination by microorganisms in wheat.

Material
Arkadia and Tonacjae1
Treatment
UV-C radiatione0
Outcome
seed germination contamination by microorganismse0
Direction
suppressinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV-C radiation was effective in suppressing seed germination contamination by microorganisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–838 · show in text ↑
e1

“the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties Arkadia and Tonacja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–418 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C radiation slightly affected seed germination energy of wheat but it remained high at 79–95%.

Material
Arkadia and Tonacjae1
Treatment
UV-C radiatione0
Outcome
seed germination energye0
Direction
slightly affectede0
Value
79–95%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seed germination energy was slightly affected by UV-C radiation but remained at a high level (79–95%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–945 · show in text ↑
e1

“the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties Arkadia and Tonacja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–418 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sterilization process reduced neither the growth and development of wheat sprouts nor nutrient bioassimilation.

Material
Arkadia and Tonacjae1
Treatment
applied sterilization processe0
Outcome
growth and development of sprouts nor nutrient bioassimilatione0
Direction
reduced neithere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The applied sterilization process reduced neither the growth and development of sprouts nor nutrient bioassimilation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1239 · show in text ↑
e1

“the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties Arkadia and Tonacja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–418 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microelement assimilation in wheat tissues increased with the ion concentration in the media, with a very strong correlation (R2 > 0.9).

Treatment
ion concentration in the mediae0
Outcome
microelement assimilation in the plant tissuese0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
R2 > 0.9e0
Qualifier
very strong correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A very strong correlation between the ion concentration in the media and microelement assimilation in the plant tissues (R2 > 0.9) was detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1481 · show in text ↑
e1

“the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties Arkadia and Tonacja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–418 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe supply at 100 µg g−1 for 7 days raised nutrient accumulation in wheat sprouts by 218% and 322% over the control.

Material
Arkadia and Tonacjae1
Treatment
100 µg g−1 of solutions with Fee2
Outcome
nutrient accumulatione0
Direction
bettere0
Value
218% and 322%e0
Comparator
control conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fe (218% and 322% better nutrient accumulation in comparison to the control condition)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1862–1948 · show in text ↑
e1

“the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties Arkadia and Tonacja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–418 · show in text ↑
e2

“The best conditions were indicated for 7-day cultivation in 100 µg g−1 of solutions with Fe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1773–1864 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn supply raised zinc concentration in wheat sprouts 19 and 29 times compared with sprouts without supplementation.

Material
Arkadia and Tonacjae1
Treatment
Zne0
Outcome
zinc concentratione0
Direction
richere0
Value
19 and 29 timese0
Comparator
sprouts without supplementatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn (19 and 29 times richer in zinc concentration compared to the sprouts without supplementation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1953–2050 · show in text ↑
e1

“the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties Arkadia and Tonacja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–418 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum magnesium biofortification of wheat sprouts did not exceed 40% compared with the control sample.

Material
Arkadia and Tonacjae1
Treatment
magnesiume0
Outcome
plant product biofortification with magnesiume0
Direction
did not exceede0
Value
40%e0
Qualifier
maximume0
Comparator
control samplee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum plant product biofortification with magnesium did not exceed 40% in intensity compared to the control sample”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2052–2172 · show in text ↑
e1

“the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties Arkadia and Tonacja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–418 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat sprouts grown with 50 µg g−1 Cr were the best-developed sprouts.

Material
Arkadia and Tonacjae1
Treatment
the solution with 50 µg g−1 of Cre0
Outcome
best-developed sproutse0
Direction
best-developede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best-developed sprouts were grown in the solution with 50 µg g−1 of Cr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2174–2248 · show in text ↑
e1

“the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties Arkadia and Tonacja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–418 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cr at 200 µg g−1 was clearly toxic to wheat sprouts.

Material
Arkadia and Tonacjae1
Treatment
concentration of 200 µg g−1e0
Outcome
clearly toxic to the wheat sproutse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast, the concentration of 200 µg g−1 was clearly toxic to the wheat sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2250–2333 · show in text ↑
e1

“the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties Arkadia and Tonacja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–418 · show in text ↑

iron atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

74 papers: 61 positive, 13 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

magnesium atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 17 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

uv · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

45 papers: 19 positive, 26 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.