Paper · 2023 · Journal of Medicinal Plants Research

Citrullus lanatus plant response to irrigation water magnetized in sandy soil

GHEMAM AMARA Djilani; LAOUEDJ Hacene; Elkhalifa CHEMSA Ahmed; et al.

10
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In this study, the productivity of the red watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) crop in arid regions with saline water is examined in relation to the effects of magnetic treatment of irrigation water. The greenhouse experiments compared two treatments (magnetic treatment of irrigation water) and (no magnetic treatment of irrigation water). Magnetic treatment device delta water with a power of 14500 gausses (1.45 T) that was delivered from the company professional hydraulic (CPH) was used for vegetative traits on growing periods and quantitative, qualitative, and chemical production characteristics at maturity. The leaf area and the number of seedlings treated with magnetic water (MW) increased significantly by 8.7 and 1.4%, respectively, compared to control seedlings. Leaf holder length also decreased. Except for plant height prior to branching, it also demonstrated a notable increase in stem characteristics. Magnetic water (MW) enhanced the yield characteristics (quantitative, qualitative, and chemical), resulting in increases in the number of fruits produced per plant 11.4%, fruit weight 2%, the weight of a kilogram of seeds, and yield, respectively with 0.34, 10.34 and 16.5% decrease in fruit peel thickness. Additionally, it revealed that the sugar content had increased by 15.4% and that the acidity and electrical conductivity (EC) had changed. By adding magnetic treatment to irrigation water, fruits ripen earlier and have better texture, traceability and homogeneity. Key words: Magnetic water, Citrullus lanatus, productivity, irrigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedlings treated with magnetic water had 8.7% more leaf area than control seedlings in greenhouse experiments.

Taxon
Citrullus lanatusCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
magnetic water (MW)e1
Outcome
leaf areae1
Direction
increasede1
Value
8.7e1
Comparator
control seedlingse1
Setting
greenhousee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Citrullus lanatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–17 · show in text ↑
e1

“The leaf area and the number of seedlings treated with magnetic water (MW) increased significantly by 8.7 and 1.4%, respectively, compared to control seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–771 · show in text ↑
e2

“The greenhouse experiments compared two treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedlings treated with magnetic water had 1.4% more seedlings than control seedlings.

Taxon
Citrullus lanatusCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
magnetic water (MW)e1
Outcome
number of seedlingse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
1.4%e1
Comparator
control seedlingse1
Setting
greenhousee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Citrullus lanatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–17 · show in text ↑
e1

“The leaf area and the number of seedlings treated with magnetic water (MW) increased significantly by 8.7 and 1.4%, respectively, compared to control seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–771 · show in text ↑
e2

“The greenhouse experiments compared two treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetic water increased the number of fruits produced per plant by 11.4%.

Taxon
Citrullus lanatusCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Magnetic water (MW)e3
Outcome
number of fruits produced per plante3
Direction
increasese3
Value
11.4%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Citrullus lanatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–17 · show in text ↑
e3

“Magnetic water (MW) enhanced the yield characteristics (quantitative, qualitative, and chemical), resulting in increases in the number of fruits produced per plant 11.4%, fruit weight 2%, the weight of a kilogram of seeds, and yield, respectively with 0.34, 10.34 and 16.5% decrease in fruit peel thickness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1223 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetic water increased fruit weight by 2%.

Taxon
Citrullus lanatusCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Magnetic water (MW)e3
Outcome
fruit weighte3
Direction
increasese3
Value
2%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Citrullus lanatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–17 · show in text ↑
e3

“Magnetic water (MW) enhanced the yield characteristics (quantitative, qualitative, and chemical), resulting in increases in the number of fruits produced per plant 11.4%, fruit weight 2%, the weight of a kilogram of seeds, and yield, respectively with 0.34, 10.34 and 16.5% decrease in fruit peel thickness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1223 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetic water increased the weight of a kilogram of seeds and yield.

Taxon
Citrullus lanatusCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Magnetic water (MW)e3
Outcome
the weight of a kilogram of seeds, and yielde3
Direction
increasese3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Citrullus lanatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–17 · show in text ↑
e3

“Magnetic water (MW) enhanced the yield characteristics (quantitative, qualitative, and chemical), resulting in increases in the number of fruits produced per plant 11.4%, fruit weight 2%, the weight of a kilogram of seeds, and yield, respectively with 0.34, 10.34 and 16.5% decrease in fruit peel thickness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1223 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetic water decreased fruit peel thickness; the abstract gives 0.34, 10.34 and 16.5% without mapping them to items.

Taxon
Citrullus lanatusCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Magnetic water (MW)e3
Outcome
fruit peel thicknesse3
Direction
decreasee3
Value
0.34, 10.34 and 16.5%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Citrullus lanatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–17 · show in text ↑
e3

“Magnetic water (MW) enhanced the yield characteristics (quantitative, qualitative, and chemical), resulting in increases in the number of fruits produced per plant 11.4%, fruit weight 2%, the weight of a kilogram of seeds, and yield, respectively with 0.34, 10.34 and 16.5% decrease in fruit peel thickness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1223 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetic water increased sugar content by 15.4%.

Taxon
Citrullus lanatusCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Magnetic water (MW)e3
Outcome
sugar contente4
Direction
increasede4
Value
15.4%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Citrullus lanatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–17 · show in text ↑
e3

“Magnetic water (MW) enhanced the yield characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–971 · show in text ↑
e4

“it revealed that the sugar content had increased by 15.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetic treatment changed the acidity and electrical conductivity of the fruit; the direction is not stated.

Taxon
Citrullus lanatusCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Magnetic water (MW)e3
Outcome
acidity and electrical conductivity (EC)e5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Citrullus lanatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–17 · show in text ↑
e3

“Magnetic water (MW) enhanced the yield characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–971 · show in text ↑
e5

“the acidity and electrical conductivity (EC) had changed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1362 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding magnetic treatment to irrigation water made fruits ripen earlier.

Taxon
Citrullus lanatusCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
magnetic treatment to irrigation watere6
Outcome
fruits ripene6
Direction
earliere6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Citrullus lanatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–17 · show in text ↑
e6

“By adding magnetic treatment to irrigation water, fruits ripen earlier and have better texture, traceability and homogeneity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1488 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding magnetic treatment to irrigation water gave fruits better texture, traceability and homogeneity.

Taxon
Citrullus lanatusCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
magnetic treatment to irrigation watere6
Outcome
texture, traceability and homogeneitye6
Direction
bettere6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Citrullus lanatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–17 · show in text ↑
e6

“By adding magnetic treatment to irrigation water, fruits ripen earlier and have better texture, traceability and homogeneity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1488 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: postharvest · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.