Abstract
A field experiment was carried out during kharif seasons in 2020 and 2021 at Agronomy Main Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar to study effect of crop establishment method and organic nutrient management on finger millet ('Arjuna' variety). The experiment was laid out in a split plot design and replicated thrice. The treatments comprised of 2 methods of crop establishment viz. conventional method of line transplanting (20 cm x 10 cm) and system of finger millet intensification (25 cm X 25 cm ) in main plot with application of 4 organic nutrient sources viz. farm yard manure (FYM) @ 100% recommended nitrogen dose (RDN), FYM @ 50% RDN (basal) + Vermicompost @ 50% RDN (top dressing) and FYM @ 25% RDN (basal) + toria oil cake @ 25% RDN (basal) + Vermicompost @ 50 % RDN (topdressing) allotted to sub plot in finger millet during Kharif season. System of finger millet intensification (SFMI) method of establishment resulted in superior yield attributes, grain yield (2,051 kg ha-1), straw yield (2,901 kg ha-1) and harvest index (41.42%) in finger millet than line transplanting. Yield attributes, grain yield (2,092 kg ha-1), straw yield (2,889 kg ha-1 ) and harvest index (42.00 %) were higher with the application of FYM @ 50% RDN (basal) + Vermicompost @ 50 % RDN (top dressing) in finger millet and was statistically similar with application of FYM @ 25% RDN (basal) + toria oil cake @ 25% RDN (basal) + Vermicompost @ 50 % RDN (top dressing). The benefit cost ratio was higher in SFMI and with the application of FYM @ 50% RDN (basal) + Vermicompost @ 50 % RDN (top dressing) to finger millet.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
SFMI improved finger millet yield attributes relative to line transplanting.
- Taxon
- finger millet
Eleusine coracanae0 - Treatment
- System of finger millet intensification (SFMI)e0
- Outcome
- yield attributese0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- line transplantinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“System of finger millet intensification (SFMI) method of establishment resulted in superior yield attributes, grain yield (2,051 kg ha-1), straw yield (2,901 kg ha-1) and harvest index (41.42%) in finger millet than line transplanting”
Claim · model-written summary
SFMI produced 2,051 kg ha-1 grain yield, higher than line transplanting.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanae0
- Treatment
- System of finger millet intensification (SFMI)e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Value
- 2,051 kg ha-1e0
- Comparator
- line transplantinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“System of finger millet intensification (SFMI) method of establishment resulted in superior yield attributes, grain yield (2,051 kg ha-1), straw yield (2,901 kg ha-1) and harvest index (41.42%) in finger millet than line transplanting”
Claim · model-written summary
SFMI produced 2,901 kg ha-1 straw yield, higher than line transplanting.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanae0
- Treatment
- System of finger millet intensification (SFMI)e0
- Outcome
- straw yielde0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Value
- 2,901 kg ha-1e0
- Comparator
- line transplantinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“System of finger millet intensification (SFMI) method of establishment resulted in superior yield attributes, grain yield (2,051 kg ha-1), straw yield (2,901 kg ha-1) and harvest index (41.42%) in finger millet than line transplanting”
Claim · model-written summary
SFMI achieved 41.42% harvest index, higher than line transplanting.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanae0
- Treatment
- System of finger millet intensification (SFMI)e0
- Outcome
- harvest indexe0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Value
- 41.42%e0
- Comparator
- line transplantinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“System of finger millet intensification (SFMI) method of establishment resulted in superior yield attributes, grain yield (2,051 kg ha-1), straw yield (2,901 kg ha-1) and harvest index (41.42%) in finger millet than line transplanting”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM 50% RDN plus vermicompost 50% RDN improved finger millet yield attributes.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanae0
- Treatment
- FYM @ 50% RDN (basal) + Vermicompost @ 50 % RDN (top dressing)e0
- Outcome
- Yield attributese0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yield attributes, grain yield (2,092 kg ha-1), straw yield (2,889 kg ha-1 ) and harvest index (42.00 %) were higher with the application of FYM @ 50% RDN (basal) + Vermicompost @ 50 % RDN (top dressing) in finger millet”
Claim · model-written summary
The FYM plus vermicompost treatment produced 2,092 kg ha-1 grain yield.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanae0
- Treatment
- FYM @ 50% RDN (basal) + Vermicompost @ 50 % RDN (top dressing)e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 2,092 kg ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grain yield (2,092 kg ha-1), straw yield (2,889 kg ha-1 ) and harvest index (42.00 %) were higher with the application of FYM @ 50% RDN (basal) + Vermicompost @ 50 % RDN (top dressing) in finger millet”
Claim · model-written summary
The FYM plus vermicompost treatment produced 2,889 kg ha-1 straw yield.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanae0
- Treatment
- FYM @ 50% RDN (basal) + Vermicompost @ 50 % RDN (top dressing)e0
- Outcome
- straw yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 2,889 kg ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grain yield (2,092 kg ha-1), straw yield (2,889 kg ha-1 ) and harvest index (42.00 %) were higher with the application of FYM @ 50% RDN (basal) + Vermicompost @ 50 % RDN (top dressing) in finger millet”
Claim · model-written summary
The FYM plus vermicompost treatment achieved 42.00% harvest index.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanae0
- Treatment
- FYM @ 50% RDN (basal) + Vermicompost @ 50 % RDN (top dressing)e0
- Outcome
- harvest indexe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 42.00 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“grain yield (2,092 kg ha-1), straw yield (2,889 kg ha-1 ) and harvest index (42.00 %) were higher with the application of FYM @ 50% RDN (basal) + Vermicompost @ 50 % RDN (top dressing) in finger millet”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM plus vermicompost outcomes were statistically similar to the FYM, toria oil cake and vermicompost combination.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- FYM @ 25% RDN (basal) + toria oil cake @ 25% RDN (basal) + Vermicompost @ 50 % RDN (top dressing)e0
- Outcome
- statistically similare0
- Direction
- statistically similare0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“was statistically similar with application of FYM @ 25% RDN (basal) + toria oil cake @ 25% RDN (basal) + Vermicompost @ 50 % RDN (top dressing)”
t0“Finger Millet”
Claim · model-written summary
SFMI had a higher benefit cost ratio.
- Taxon
- Finger MilletEleusine coracanat0
- Treatment
- SFMIe0
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratioe0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The benefit cost ratio was higher in SFMI”
t0“Finger Millet”
Claim · model-written summary
FYM 50% RDN plus vermicompost 50% RDN had a higher benefit cost ratio.
- Taxon
- finger milletEleusine coracanae0
- Treatment
- FYM @ 50% RDN (basal) + Vermicompost @ 50 % RDN (top dressing)e0
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratioe0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“benefit cost ratio was higher in SFMI and with the application of FYM @ 50% RDN (basal) + Vermicompost @ 50 % RDN (top dressing) to finger millet”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
170 papers more in this group
See all 174 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.