Paper · 2022 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Impact of sulphur fertilization on yield and its components of three flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) genotypes

ABDELMASIEH, William K.L.; EL-BORHAMY, Amal M.A.; EL-SADEK, Maysa S. ABD

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

The objective of this experiment was to investigate yield, yield components and quality of three flax genotypes (Sakha 3, Sakha 5 and Giza 11) under different sulphur fertilization levels (0, 25.0, 37.5, 50.0 and 62.5 kg/ha). Split-plot design was used for the experiment with four replicates. The main-plots were assigned to the five fertilization levels of sulphur and the sub-plots were allocated to the three flax genotypes. Application of 50.0 kg sulphur/ha significantly increased most of the studied characters i.e. technical length, straw yield/plant, straw yield/ha, fruiting zone length, number of capsules/plant, seed yield/ha, fiber length and fiber yield/ha in both seasons. Results also showed that Giza11 significantly surpassed other genotypes in technical length, stem diameter, straw yield/plant and per hectare, seed index and fiber length, whilst Sakha 3 was superior in fiber percentage and fiber yield/ha in the first and second seasons, respectively. Sakha 5 genotype recorded the best results for fruiting zone length, number of capsules/plant and seed yield/ha in both seasons. Therefore, this study recommends using fertilization level of 50.0 kg sulphur/ha with Giza11 for the best straw yield/ha, Sakha 3 for the best fiber yield/ha and Sakha 5 for the best seed yield/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 50.0 kg/ha significantly increased technical length in both seasons.

Treatment
50.0 kg sulphur/hae0
Outcome
technical lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 50.0 kg sulphur/ha significantly increased most of the studied characters i.e. technical length, straw yield/plant, straw yield/ha, fruiting zone length, number of capsules/plant, seed yield/ha, fiber length and fiber yield/ha in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 50.0 kg/ha significantly increased straw yield/plant in both seasons.

Treatment
50.0 kg sulphur/hae0
Outcome
straw yield/plante0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 50.0 kg sulphur/ha significantly increased most of the studied characters i.e. technical length, straw yield/plant, straw yield/ha, fruiting zone length, number of capsules/plant, seed yield/ha, fiber length and fiber yield/ha in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 50.0 kg/ha significantly increased straw yield/ha in both seasons.

Treatment
50.0 kg sulphur/hae0
Outcome
straw yield/hae0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 50.0 kg sulphur/ha significantly increased most of the studied characters i.e. technical length, straw yield/plant, straw yield/ha, fruiting zone length, number of capsules/plant, seed yield/ha, fiber length and fiber yield/ha in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 50.0 kg/ha significantly increased fruiting zone length in both seasons.

Treatment
50.0 kg sulphur/hae0
Outcome
fruiting zone lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 50.0 kg sulphur/ha significantly increased most of the studied characters i.e. technical length, straw yield/plant, straw yield/ha, fruiting zone length, number of capsules/plant, seed yield/ha, fiber length and fiber yield/ha in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 50.0 kg/ha significantly increased number of capsules/plant in both seasons.

Treatment
50.0 kg sulphur/hae0
Outcome
number of capsules/plante0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 50.0 kg sulphur/ha significantly increased most of the studied characters i.e. technical length, straw yield/plant, straw yield/ha, fruiting zone length, number of capsules/plant, seed yield/ha, fiber length and fiber yield/ha in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 50.0 kg/ha significantly increased seed yield/ha in both seasons.

Treatment
50.0 kg sulphur/hae0
Outcome
seed yield/hae0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 50.0 kg sulphur/ha significantly increased most of the studied characters i.e. technical length, straw yield/plant, straw yield/ha, fruiting zone length, number of capsules/plant, seed yield/ha, fiber length and fiber yield/ha in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 50.0 kg/ha significantly increased fiber length in both seasons.

Treatment
50.0 kg sulphur/hae0
Outcome
fiber lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 50.0 kg sulphur/ha significantly increased most of the studied characters i.e. technical length, straw yield/plant, straw yield/ha, fruiting zone length, number of capsules/plant, seed yield/ha, fiber length and fiber yield/ha in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 50.0 kg/ha significantly increased fiber yield/ha in both seasons.

Treatment
50.0 kg sulphur/hae0
Outcome
fiber yield/hae0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 50.0 kg sulphur/ha significantly increased most of the studied characters i.e. technical length, straw yield/plant, straw yield/ha, fruiting zone length, number of capsules/plant, seed yield/ha, fiber length and fiber yield/ha in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza11 significantly surpassed other genotypes in technical length.

Material
Giza11e0
Outcome
technical lengthe0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
other genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results also showed that Giza11 significantly surpassed other genotypes in technical length, stem diameter, straw yield/plant and per hectare, seed index and fiber length, whilst Sakha 3 was superior in fiber percentage and fiber yield/ha in the first and second seasons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza11 significantly surpassed other genotypes in stem diameter.

Material
Giza11e0
Outcome
stem diametere0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
other genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results also showed that Giza11 significantly surpassed other genotypes in technical length, stem diameter, straw yield/plant and per hectare, seed index and fiber length, whilst Sakha 3 was superior in fiber percentage and fiber yield/ha in the first and second seasons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza11 significantly surpassed other genotypes in straw yield/plant.

Material
Giza11e0
Outcome
straw yield/plante0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
other genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results also showed that Giza11 significantly surpassed other genotypes in technical length, stem diameter, straw yield/plant and per hectare, seed index and fiber length, whilst Sakha 3 was superior in fiber percentage and fiber yield/ha in the first and second seasons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza11 significantly surpassed other genotypes in straw yield/plant and per hectare.

Material
Giza11e0
Outcome
straw yield/plant and per hectaree0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
other genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results also showed that Giza11 significantly surpassed other genotypes in technical length, stem diameter, straw yield/plant and per hectare, seed index and fiber length, whilst Sakha 3 was superior in fiber percentage and fiber yield/ha in the first and second seasons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza11 significantly surpassed other genotypes in seed index.

Material
Giza11e0
Outcome
seed indexe0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
other genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results also showed that Giza11 significantly surpassed other genotypes in technical length, stem diameter, straw yield/plant and per hectare, seed index and fiber length, whilst Sakha 3 was superior in fiber percentage and fiber yield/ha in the first and second seasons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza11 significantly surpassed other genotypes in fiber length.

Material
Giza11e0
Outcome
fiber lengthe0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
other genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results also showed that Giza11 significantly surpassed other genotypes in technical length, stem diameter, straw yield/plant and per hectare, seed index and fiber length, whilst Sakha 3 was superior in fiber percentage and fiber yield/ha in the first and second seasons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha 3 was superior in fiber percentage.

Material
Sakha 3e0
Outcome
fiber percentagee0
Direction
superiore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results also showed that Giza11 significantly surpassed other genotypes in technical length, stem diameter, straw yield/plant and per hectare, seed index and fiber length, whilst Sakha 3 was superior in fiber percentage and fiber yield/ha in the first and second seasons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha 3 was superior in fiber yield/ha.

Material
Sakha 3e0
Outcome
fiber yield/hae0
Direction
superiore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results also showed that Giza11 significantly surpassed other genotypes in technical length, stem diameter, straw yield/plant and per hectare, seed index and fiber length, whilst Sakha 3 was superior in fiber percentage and fiber yield/ha in the first and second seasons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha 5 had the best fruiting zone length in both seasons.

Material
Sakha 5e0
Outcome
fruiting zone lengthe0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sakha 5 genotype recorded the best results for fruiting zone length, number of capsules/plant and seed yield/ha in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha 5 had the best number of capsules/plant in both seasons.

Material
Sakha 5e0
Outcome
number of capsules/plante0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sakha 5 genotype recorded the best results for fruiting zone length, number of capsules/plant and seed yield/ha in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha 5 had the best seed yield/ha in both seasons.

Material
Sakha 5e0
Outcome
seed yield/hae0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sakha 5 genotype recorded the best results for fruiting zone length, number of capsules/plant and seed yield/ha in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Use 50.0 kg sulphur/ha with Giza11 for straw yield, Sakha 3 for fiber yield, and Sakha 5 for seed yield.

Treatment
50.0 kg sulphur/hae0
Outcome
best straw yield/ha, Sakha 3 for the best fiber yield/ha and Sakha 5 for the best seed yield/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Therefore, this study recommends using fertilization level of 50.0 kg sulphur/ha with Giza11 for the best straw yield/ha, Sakha 3 for the best fiber yield/ha and Sakha 5 for the best seed yield/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“flax (Linum usitatissimum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–98 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

sulfur atom · quality: grain · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.