Abstract
The efficacy of five different insecticides was evaluated against bollworms under cotton cultivated crop during the Kharif season, 2021. The insecticides namely; T1= Triazophos 120ml, T2= Deltamethrin+Triazophos 100ml, T3= Cypermethrin 60ml, T4= Emamectin 50ml, T5= Abamectin 20ml/tank and T6= Control (water-washed) were applied and replicated two times on Hari Dsot cotton cultivar variety. The field experimental plot sizes were kept at 100ft, number of rows 100, row to row space 60cm, plant to plant space 25cm, and sprays were done in the early morning after 15 days interval basis. Through RCBD data of the pest population was gathered as pre-treatment and after 3rd, 7th, and 14th days of post-spray. After 1st spray at 1st replication, the abamectin found with more efficacy caused highest reduction (68.68%), followed by the combination of deltamethrin+triazophos (60.55%), cypermethrin (57.45%), emamectin (52.35%) and triazophos (48.65%), against Earias vittella, and after 2nd spray, at 2nd fortnight replication abamectin caused again highest larvae reduction (78.87%), followed by emamectin (60.35%), cypermethrin (54.25%), deltamethrin+triazophos (50.65%) and triazophos (47.55%). In the scheduled of 1st spray at 1st replication the abamectin caused the highest reduction (94.75%), followed by deltamethrin+triazophos (73.25%), cypermethrin (70.45%), triazophos (65.25%), and emamectin (62.45%), against Pectinophora gossypiella, hence; after 2nd spray at 2nd fortnight replication, the abamectin proved with high reduction again (97.15%), followed by cypermethrin (71.35%), deltamethrin+triazophos (63.65%) emamectin (60.75%), and triazophos (59.55%), respectively. After completion of two successive replicated sprays, it is concluded that the insecticide abamectin proved highest reduction % against both cotton borer species hence, recommended. Intensive attention to the enhancement of biological controlling agents and wise application of pesticides is the best solution for future endeavours.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 20
Claim · model-written summary
abamectin reduced Earias vittella after the 1st spray by 68.68%.
- Taxon
- COTTON
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- abamectine0
- Interactor
- Earias vittella
_Figure_26b.jpg?width=60)
Earias vittellae0pest - Outcome
- reductione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 68.68%e0
- Qualifier
- 1st spraye0
- Comparator
- Control (water-washed)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Figure_26b.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“After 1st spray at 1st replication, the abamectin found with more efficacy caused highest reduction (68.68%), followed by the combination of deltamethrin+triazophos (60.55%), cypermethrin (57.45%), emamectin (52.35%) and triazophos (48.65%), against Earias vittella”
t0“COTTON”
e1“Control (water-washed)”
Claim · model-written summary
deltamethrin+triazophos reduced Earias vittella after the 1st spray by 60.55%.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- deltamethrin+triazophose0
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellae0pest
- Outcome
- reductione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 60.55%e0
- Qualifier
- 1st spraye0
- Comparator
- Control (water-washed)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“After 1st spray at 1st replication, the abamectin found with more efficacy caused highest reduction (68.68%), followed by the combination of deltamethrin+triazophos (60.55%), cypermethrin (57.45%), emamectin (52.35%) and triazophos (48.65%), against Earias vittella”
t0“COTTON”
e1“Control (water-washed)”
Claim · model-written summary
cypermethrin reduced Earias vittella after the 1st spray by 57.45%.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- cypermethrine0
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellae0pest
- Outcome
- reductione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 57.45%e0
- Qualifier
- 1st spraye0
- Comparator
- Control (water-washed)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“After 1st spray at 1st replication, the abamectin found with more efficacy caused highest reduction (68.68%), followed by the combination of deltamethrin+triazophos (60.55%), cypermethrin (57.45%), emamectin (52.35%) and triazophos (48.65%), against Earias vittella”
t0“COTTON”
e1“Control (water-washed)”
Claim · model-written summary
emamectin reduced Earias vittella after the 1st spray by 52.35%.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- emamectine0
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellae0pest
- Outcome
- reductione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 52.35%e0
- Qualifier
- 1st spraye0
- Comparator
- Control (water-washed)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“After 1st spray at 1st replication, the abamectin found with more efficacy caused highest reduction (68.68%), followed by the combination of deltamethrin+triazophos (60.55%), cypermethrin (57.45%), emamectin (52.35%) and triazophos (48.65%), against Earias vittella”
t0“COTTON”
e1“Control (water-washed)”
Claim · model-written summary
triazophos reduced Earias vittella after the 1st spray by 48.65%.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- triazophose0
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellae0pest
- Outcome
- reductione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 48.65%e0
- Qualifier
- 1st spraye0
- Comparator
- Control (water-washed)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“After 1st spray at 1st replication, the abamectin found with more efficacy caused highest reduction (68.68%), followed by the combination of deltamethrin+triazophos (60.55%), cypermethrin (57.45%), emamectin (52.35%) and triazophos (48.65%), against Earias vittella”
t0“COTTON”
e1“Control (water-washed)”
Claim · model-written summary
abamectin reduced Earias vittella after the 2nd spray by 78.87%.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- abamectine0
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellae2peste0
- Outcome
- reductione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 78.87%e0
- Qualifier
- 2nd spraye0
- Comparator
- Control (water-washed)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“after 2nd spray, at 2nd fortnight replication abamectin caused again highest larvae reduction (78.87%), followed by emamectin (60.35%), cypermethrin (54.25%), deltamethrin+triazophos (50.65%) and triazophos (47.55%).”
t0“COTTON”
e1“Control (water-washed)”
e2“After 1st spray at 1st replication, the abamectin found with more efficacy caused highest reduction (68.68%), followed by the combination of deltamethrin+triazophos (60.55%), cypermethrin (57.45%), emamectin (52.35%) and triazophos (48.65%), against Earias vittella”
Claim · model-written summary
emamectin reduced Earias vittella after the 2nd spray by 60.35%.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- emamectine0
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellae2peste0
- Outcome
- reductione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 60.35%e0
- Qualifier
- 2nd spraye0
- Comparator
- Control (water-washed)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“after 2nd spray, at 2nd fortnight replication abamectin caused again highest larvae reduction (78.87%), followed by emamectin (60.35%), cypermethrin (54.25%), deltamethrin+triazophos (50.65%) and triazophos (47.55%).”
t0“COTTON”
e1“Control (water-washed)”
e2“After 1st spray at 1st replication, the abamectin found with more efficacy caused highest reduction (68.68%), followed by the combination of deltamethrin+triazophos (60.55%), cypermethrin (57.45%), emamectin (52.35%) and triazophos (48.65%), against Earias vittella”
Claim · model-written summary
cypermethrin reduced Earias vittella after the 2nd spray by 54.25%.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- cypermethrine0
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellae2peste0
- Outcome
- reductione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 54.25%e0
- Qualifier
- 2nd spraye0
- Comparator
- Control (water-washed)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“after 2nd spray, at 2nd fortnight replication abamectin caused again highest larvae reduction (78.87%), followed by emamectin (60.35%), cypermethrin (54.25%), deltamethrin+triazophos (50.65%) and triazophos (47.55%).”
t0“COTTON”
e1“Control (water-washed)”
e2“After 1st spray at 1st replication, the abamectin found with more efficacy caused highest reduction (68.68%), followed by the combination of deltamethrin+triazophos (60.55%), cypermethrin (57.45%), emamectin (52.35%) and triazophos (48.65%), against Earias vittella”
Claim · model-written summary
deltamethrin+triazophos reduced Earias vittella after the 2nd spray by 50.65%.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- deltamethrin+triazophose0
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellae2peste0
- Outcome
- reductione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 50.65%e0
- Qualifier
- 2nd spraye0
- Comparator
- Control (water-washed)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“after 2nd spray, at 2nd fortnight replication abamectin caused again highest larvae reduction (78.87%), followed by emamectin (60.35%), cypermethrin (54.25%), deltamethrin+triazophos (50.65%) and triazophos (47.55%).”
t0“COTTON”
e1“Control (water-washed)”
e2“After 1st spray at 1st replication, the abamectin found with more efficacy caused highest reduction (68.68%), followed by the combination of deltamethrin+triazophos (60.55%), cypermethrin (57.45%), emamectin (52.35%) and triazophos (48.65%), against Earias vittella”
Claim · model-written summary
triazophos reduced Earias vittella after the 2nd spray by 47.55%.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- triazophose0
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellae2peste0
- Outcome
- reductione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 47.55%e0
- Qualifier
- 2nd spraye0
- Comparator
- Control (water-washed)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“after 2nd spray, at 2nd fortnight replication abamectin caused again highest larvae reduction (78.87%), followed by emamectin (60.35%), cypermethrin (54.25%), deltamethrin+triazophos (50.65%) and triazophos (47.55%).”
t0“COTTON”
e1“Control (water-washed)”
e2“After 1st spray at 1st replication, the abamectin found with more efficacy caused highest reduction (68.68%), followed by the combination of deltamethrin+triazophos (60.55%), cypermethrin (57.45%), emamectin (52.35%) and triazophos (48.65%), against Earias vittella”
Claim · model-written summary
abamectin reduced Pectinophora gossypiella after the 1st spray by 94.75%.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- abamectine0
- Interactor
- Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiellae0pest - Outcome
- reductione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 94.75%e0
- Qualifier
- 1st spraye0
- Comparator
- Control (water-washed)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the scheduled of 1st spray at 1st replication the abamectin caused the highest reduction (94.75%), followed by deltamethrin+triazophos (73.25%), cypermethrin (70.45%), triazophos (65.25%), and emamectin (62.45%), against Pectinophora gossypiella”
t0“COTTON”
e1“Control (water-washed)”
Claim · model-written summary
deltamethrin+triazophos reduced Pectinophora gossypiella after the 1st spray by 73.25%.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- deltamethrin+triazophose0
- Interactor
- Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae0pest
- Outcome
- reductione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 73.25%e0
- Qualifier
- 1st spraye0
- Comparator
- Control (water-washed)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the scheduled of 1st spray at 1st replication the abamectin caused the highest reduction (94.75%), followed by deltamethrin+triazophos (73.25%), cypermethrin (70.45%), triazophos (65.25%), and emamectin (62.45%), against Pectinophora gossypiella”
t0“COTTON”
e1“Control (water-washed)”
Claim · model-written summary
cypermethrin reduced Pectinophora gossypiella after the 1st spray by 70.45%.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- cypermethrine0
- Interactor
- Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae0pest
- Outcome
- reductione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 70.45%e0
- Qualifier
- 1st spraye0
- Comparator
- Control (water-washed)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the scheduled of 1st spray at 1st replication the abamectin caused the highest reduction (94.75%), followed by deltamethrin+triazophos (73.25%), cypermethrin (70.45%), triazophos (65.25%), and emamectin (62.45%), against Pectinophora gossypiella”
t0“COTTON”
e1“Control (water-washed)”
Claim · model-written summary
triazophos reduced Pectinophora gossypiella after the 1st spray by 65.25%.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- triazophose0
- Interactor
- Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae0pest
- Outcome
- reductione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 65.25%e0
- Qualifier
- 1st spraye0
- Comparator
- Control (water-washed)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the scheduled of 1st spray at 1st replication the abamectin caused the highest reduction (94.75%), followed by deltamethrin+triazophos (73.25%), cypermethrin (70.45%), triazophos (65.25%), and emamectin (62.45%), against Pectinophora gossypiella”
t0“COTTON”
e1“Control (water-washed)”
Claim · model-written summary
emamectin reduced Pectinophora gossypiella after the 1st spray by 62.45%.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- emamectine0
- Interactor
- Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae0pest
- Outcome
- reductione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 62.45%e0
- Qualifier
- 1st spraye0
- Comparator
- Control (water-washed)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the scheduled of 1st spray at 1st replication the abamectin caused the highest reduction (94.75%), followed by deltamethrin+triazophos (73.25%), cypermethrin (70.45%), triazophos (65.25%), and emamectin (62.45%), against Pectinophora gossypiella”
t0“COTTON”
e1“Control (water-washed)”
Claim · model-written summary
abamectin reduced Pectinophora gossypiella after the 2nd spray by 97.15%.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- abamectine0
- Interactor
- Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae2peste0
- Outcome
- reductione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 97.15%e0
- Qualifier
- 2nd spraye0
- Comparator
- Control (water-washed)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“after 2nd spray at 2nd fortnight replication, the abamectin proved with high reduction again (97.15%), followed by cypermethrin (71.35%), deltamethrin+triazophos (63.65%) emamectin (60.75%), and triazophos (59.55%), respectively.”
t0“COTTON”
e1“Control (water-washed)”
e2“In the scheduled of 1st spray at 1st replication the abamectin caused the highest reduction (94.75%), followed by deltamethrin+triazophos (73.25%), cypermethrin (70.45%), triazophos (65.25%), and emamectin (62.45%), against Pectinophora gossypiella”
Claim · model-written summary
cypermethrin reduced Pectinophora gossypiella after the 2nd spray by 71.35%.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- cypermethrine0
- Interactor
- Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae2peste0
- Outcome
- reductione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 71.35%e0
- Qualifier
- 2nd spraye0
- Comparator
- Control (water-washed)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“after 2nd spray at 2nd fortnight replication, the abamectin proved with high reduction again (97.15%), followed by cypermethrin (71.35%), deltamethrin+triazophos (63.65%) emamectin (60.75%), and triazophos (59.55%), respectively.”
t0“COTTON”
e1“Control (water-washed)”
e2“In the scheduled of 1st spray at 1st replication the abamectin caused the highest reduction (94.75%), followed by deltamethrin+triazophos (73.25%), cypermethrin (70.45%), triazophos (65.25%), and emamectin (62.45%), against Pectinophora gossypiella”
Claim · model-written summary
deltamethrin+triazophos reduced Pectinophora gossypiella after the 2nd spray by 63.65%.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- deltamethrin+triazophose0
- Interactor
- Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae2peste0
- Outcome
- reductione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 63.65%e0
- Qualifier
- 2nd spraye0
- Comparator
- Control (water-washed)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“after 2nd spray at 2nd fortnight replication, the abamectin proved with high reduction again (97.15%), followed by cypermethrin (71.35%), deltamethrin+triazophos (63.65%) emamectin (60.75%), and triazophos (59.55%), respectively.”
t0“COTTON”
e1“Control (water-washed)”
e2“In the scheduled of 1st spray at 1st replication the abamectin caused the highest reduction (94.75%), followed by deltamethrin+triazophos (73.25%), cypermethrin (70.45%), triazophos (65.25%), and emamectin (62.45%), against Pectinophora gossypiella”
Claim · model-written summary
emamectin reduced Pectinophora gossypiella after the 2nd spray by 60.75%.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- emamectine0
- Interactor
- Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae2peste0
- Outcome
- reductione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 60.75%e0
- Qualifier
- 2nd spraye0
- Comparator
- Control (water-washed)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“after 2nd spray at 2nd fortnight replication, the abamectin proved with high reduction again (97.15%), followed by cypermethrin (71.35%), deltamethrin+triazophos (63.65%) emamectin (60.75%), and triazophos (59.55%), respectively.”
t0“COTTON”
e1“Control (water-washed)”
e2“In the scheduled of 1st spray at 1st replication the abamectin caused the highest reduction (94.75%), followed by deltamethrin+triazophos (73.25%), cypermethrin (70.45%), triazophos (65.25%), and emamectin (62.45%), against Pectinophora gossypiella”
Claim · model-written summary
triazophos reduced Pectinophora gossypiella after the 2nd spray by 59.55%.
- Taxon
- COTTONGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- triazophose0
- Interactor
- Pectinophora gossypiellaPectinophora gossypiellae2peste0
- Outcome
- reductione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 59.55%e0
- Qualifier
- 2nd spraye0
- Comparator
- Control (water-washed)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“after 2nd spray at 2nd fortnight replication, the abamectin proved with high reduction again (97.15%), followed by cypermethrin (71.35%), deltamethrin+triazophos (63.65%) emamectin (60.75%), and triazophos (59.55%), respectively.”
t0“COTTON”
e1“Control (water-washed)”
e2“In the scheduled of 1st spray at 1st replication the abamectin caused the highest reduction (94.75%), followed by deltamethrin+triazophos (73.25%), cypermethrin (70.45%), triazophos (65.25%), and emamectin (62.45%), against Pectinophora gossypiella”
The same questions in other papers
cypermethrin · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →triazophos · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.