Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Advanced Chemistry Research

Studies on weed management under transplanted rice condition

Priya .; RK Shukla; Dinesh Pandey; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the kharif season of 2021 to evaluate the "Studies on weed management under transplanted rice condition" at Instructional-cum-Research Farm, Barrister Thakur Chhedilal College of Agriculture and Research Station, Bilaspur (C.G.). The experiment was laid out in a Randomized block design with seven treatments and three replication. The treatment consisted of T1: weed control, T2: one hand weeding at 20 DAT, T3: two hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAT, T4: Pyrazosulfuron- ethyl @ 20g a.i./ha as pre emergence, T5: bispyribac sodium@ 25 g a.i./ha as post emergence, T6: Pyrazosulfuron- ethyl@ 20 g a.i./ha as pre emergence at 0-5 DAT + bispyribac sodium@25g a.i./ha as post emergence and T7:weed free. The rice variety used in the experiment was Zinco rice MS. Among the different weed management practises at 30, 60 and 90 DAT weed free (T7) allowed the lowest total weed density (2.79 and 3.13 m⁻²), dry weight of weed (4.41 and 2.22, 4.97 and 2.47 g m-2), and highest weed control efficiency (75.05 and 80.97 percent) and was found to be very effective against weed flora in transplanted rice, followed by pyrazosulfuron ethyl @20g a.i./ha as PE at 0-5 DAT + bispyribac sodium @ 25g a.i./ha as a PoE at 20-25 DAT. According to the data, significant improvements in growth parameters, yield attributes, and grain yield (5066 kg ha-1) were obtained.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free plots had the lowest total weed density at 30, 60 and 90 DAT in transplanted rice (2.79 and 3.13 m⁻²).

Treatment
weed freee1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
total weed densitye1
Direction
loweste1
Value
2.79 and 3.13 m⁻²e1
Qualifier
at 30, 60 and 90 DATe1
Comparator
different weed management practisese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“weed management under transplanted rice condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the different weed management practises at 30, 60 and 90 DAT weed free (T7) allowed the lowest total weed density (2.79 and 3.13 m⁻²), dry weight of weed (4.41 and 2.22, 4.97 and 2.47 g m-2), and highest weed control efficiency (75.05 and 80.97 percent)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–1055 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free plots had the lowest dry weight of weed at 30, 60 and 90 DAT in transplanted rice (4.41 and 2.22, 4.97 and 2.47 g m-2).

Treatment
weed freee1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
dry weight of weede1
Direction
loweste1
Value
4.41 and 2.22, 4.97 and 2.47 g m-2e1
Qualifier
at 30, 60 and 90 DATe1
Comparator
different weed management practisese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“weed management under transplanted rice condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the different weed management practises at 30, 60 and 90 DAT weed free (T7) allowed the lowest total weed density (2.79 and 3.13 m⁻²), dry weight of weed (4.41 and 2.22, 4.97 and 2.47 g m-2), and highest weed control efficiency (75.05 and 80.97 percent)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–1055 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free plots had the highest weed control efficiency at 30, 60 and 90 DAT in transplanted rice (75.05 and 80.97 percent).

Treatment
weed freee1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed control efficiencye1
Direction
higheste1
Value
75.05 and 80.97 percente1
Qualifier
at 30, 60 and 90 DATe1
Comparator
different weed management practisese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“weed management under transplanted rice condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the different weed management practises at 30, 60 and 90 DAT weed free (T7) allowed the lowest total weed density (2.79 and 3.13 m⁻²), dry weight of weed (4.41 and 2.22, 4.97 and 2.47 g m-2), and highest weed control efficiency (75.05 and 80.97 percent)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–1055 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth parameters and yield attributes of transplanted rice showed significant improvements.

Outcome
growth parameters, yield attributese2
Direction
improvementse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“weed management under transplanted rice condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–60 · show in text ↑
e2

“significant improvements in growth parameters, yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1338 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield of transplanted rice showed a significant improvement, reaching 5066 kg ha-1.

Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
improvementse3
Value
5066 kg ha-1e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“weed management under transplanted rice condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–60 · show in text ↑
e3

“significant improvements in growth parameters, yield attributes, and grain yield (5066 kg ha-1) were obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1384 · show in text ↑

herbicide · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

603 papers: 579 positive, 24 negative or no effect

578 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

599 papers more in this group

See all 603 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.