Paper · 2023 · Agricultural Water Management

Water and nitrogen management scheme of melon based on yield−quality−efficiency matching perspective under CO2 enrichment

Zelin Cai; Jiaming Bai; Rui Li; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
15
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Rising CO2 concentration in the atmosphere may modulate the response of plants to water and nitrogen, and the existing research is not sufficient to support the fine management of water and nitrogen under CO2 rise. To determine the optimal water and nitrogen strategy for melon production under CO2 enrichment in the future, we conducted an experiment with 12 treatments over three growing seasons. The effects of water nitrogen coupling on the yield, quality, and water−nitrogen use efficiency of oriental melon (Cucumis melo L. Qianyu No. 6) under CO2 enrichment were investigated and evaluated comprehensively. The treatments included two CO2 concentrations, C1 (400 ppm) and C2 (800 ppm), three irrigation levels, I1 (80% evaporation (Ep)), I2 (100% Ep), and I3 (120% Ep); two nitrogen levels, N1 (S: 184.77 kg ha–1, F: 147.21 kg ha–1) and N2 (S: 369.54 kg ha–1, F: 294.42 kg ha–1). The result showed that the yield increased with increasing levels of irrigation and nitrogen, and enriched CO2 significantly increased the yield by 10.3 − 22.9%. N2 showed a significant promoting effect on the ratio of marketable fruit in the two spring seasons. Enriched CO2 significantly increased free amino acid of I1. C2 coupled with I1 significantly reduced nitrate content by 30.9%, 14.9% in 2020 F and 2021 S, respectively. The interaction of C*I was significant in irrigation water−use efficiency (IWUE) and nitrogen−use efficiency (NUE). In particular, C2 coupled with I2 increased IWUE by 40.5%, 18.7% and NUE by 43.9%, 13.9% in the two spring seasons, respectively. Ten indicators from three categories of yield, quality, and efficiency were used to establish the evaluation system of melon and were comprehensively evaluated based on Fuzzy−Borda model combined three single models. Based on the combined evaluation model, intermediate irrigation combined with higher nitrogen input was best for melon production under CO2 enrichment. This finding suggested that melon sustainable production should control irrigation and adequately increase nitrogen fertilizer to trade−off fruit, quality, and efficiency for the expected future higher CO2 concentrations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield rose with higher irrigation.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“yield increased with increasing levels of irrigation and nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–979 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield rose with higher nitrogen.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
nitrogene0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“yield increased with increasing levels of irrigation and nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–979 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment increased yield by 10.3 − 22.9%.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
enriched CO2e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.3 − 22.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“enriched CO2 significantly increased the yield by 10.3 − 22.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N2 increased the marketable fruit ratio in both spring seasons.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
N2e0
Outcome
ratio of marketable fruite0
Direction
promotinge0
Qualifier
two spring seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“N2 showed a significant promoting effect on the ratio of marketable fruit in the two spring seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Enriched CO2 raised free amino acid under I1.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
Enriched CO2e0
Outcome
free amino acide0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
I1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“Enriched CO2 significantly increased free amino acid of I1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1208 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

C2 with I1 reduced nitrate content 30.9% in 2020 F.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
C2 coupled with I1e0
Outcome
nitrate contente0
Direction
reducede0
Value
30.9%e0
Qualifier
2020 Fe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“C2 coupled with I1 significantly reduced nitrate content by 30.9%, 14.9% in 2020 F and 2021 S, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

C2 with I1 reduced nitrate content 14.9% in 2021 S.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
C2 coupled with I1e0
Outcome
nitrate contente0
Direction
reducede0
Value
14.9%e0
Qualifier
2021 Se0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“C2 coupled with I1 significantly reduced nitrate content by 30.9%, 14.9% in 2020 F and 2021 S, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1317 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 and irrigation interacted significantly for IWUE and NUE.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
C*Ie0
Outcome
irrigation water−use efficiency (IWUE) and nitrogen−use efficiency (NUE)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“The interaction of C*I was significant in irrigation water−use efficiency (IWUE) and nitrogen−use efficiency (NUE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1433 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C2 with I2 increased IWUE 40.5% in the first spring season.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
C2 coupled with I2e0
Outcome
IWUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
40.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“C2 coupled with I2 increased IWUE by 40.5%, 18.7% and NUE by 43.9%, 13.9% in the two spring seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C2 with I2 increased IWUE 18.7% in the second spring season.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
C2 coupled with I2e0
Outcome
IWUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“C2 coupled with I2 increased IWUE by 40.5%, 18.7% and NUE by 43.9%, 13.9% in the two spring seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C2 with I2 increased NUE 43.9% in the first spring season.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
C2 coupled with I2e0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
43.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“C2 coupled with I2 increased IWUE by 40.5%, 18.7% and NUE by 43.9%, 13.9% in the two spring seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C2 with I2 increased NUE 13.9% in the second spring season.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
C2 coupled with I2e0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“C2 coupled with I2 increased IWUE by 40.5%, 18.7% and NUE by 43.9%, 13.9% in the two spring seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1563 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The combined model ranked intermediate irrigation with higher nitrogen as best.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Treatment
intermediate irrigation combined with higher nitrogen inpute0
Outcome
best for melon productione0
Comparator
CO2 enrichmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“Based on the combined evaluation model, intermediate irrigation combined with higher nitrogen input was best for melon production under CO2 enrichment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1782–1932 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend controlled irrigation and increased nitrogen fertilizer for future CO2 conditions.

Taxon
melonCucumis melot0
Outcome
control irrigation and adequately increase nitrogen fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“melon sustainable production should control irrigation and adequately increase nitrogen fertilizer to trade−off fruit, quality, and efficiency for the expected future higher CO2 concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1962–2154 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

57 papers: 37 positive, 20 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

co2 · molecular: metabolites · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 23 positive, 5 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

co2 · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.