Paper · 2023 · Anatolian Journal of Botany

Optimizing in vitro germination of primed industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) seeds

Büşra YILDIRIM; Muhammad AASIM; Selim AYTAÇ

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
5
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Germination under in vitro conditions for industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L., Cannabaceae) is highly significant for the application of biotechnological tools like genome editing. Therefore, seeds were surface sterilized followed by priming with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and sterile distilled water (dH2O) for 24, 48, and 72 h. The primed seeds were inoculated on the Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium enriched with 1.0 mg/L benzyl amino purine (BAP) and 200 mg/L antibiotics. Exposing seeds to H2O2 was superior and 100% germination was observed. Whereas hydropriming resulted in 30-52.5% germination with a maximum of 48h priming time. The results on shoot counts revealed a maximum of 1.98 shoots from the combination of 3.0% H2O2 and 72h priming time. The results were also analyzed by constructing different statistical plots like box plots, normal plots, contour plots, and surface plots. The normal plots exhibited the significance of H2O2 concentration on both output variables. Whereas contour and surface plots classified the output data into different sub-groups and confirmed the results.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogen peroxide priming produced 100% hemp germination and outperformed hydropriming.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativat0
Treatment
H2O2e0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
superiore0
Value
100%e0
Comparator
hydropriminge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exposing seeds to H2O2 was superior and 100% germination was observed. Whereas hydropriming resulted in 30-52.5% germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–600 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydropriming produced 30-52.5% hemp germination, with the maximum at 48 hours.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativat0
Treatment
hydropriminge0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
30-52.5%e0
Qualifier
48h priming timee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hydropriming resulted in 30-52.5% germination with a maximum of 48h priming time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–635 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of 3.0% H2O2 and 72h priming yielded a maximum of 1.98 shoots.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativat0
Treatment
3.0% H2O2 and 72h priming timee0
Outcome
shootse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.98 shootse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a maximum of 1.98 shoots from the combination of 3.0% H2O2 and 72h priming time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–77 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal plots found H2O2 concentration significant for both output variables.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativat0
Treatment
H2O2 concentratione0
Outcome
both output variablese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The normal plots exhibited the significance of H2O2 concentration on both output variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–77 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Contour and surface plots classified output data into subgroups and confirmed the results.

Taxon
Cannabis sativa L.Cannabis sativat0
Outcome
classified the output data into different sub-groups and confirmed the resultse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa
Cannabis sativa · TaxonThayne Tuason · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“contour and surface plots classified the output data into different sub-groups and confirmed the results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cannabis sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–77 · show in text ↑

hydrogen peroxide · growth · Cannabis sativaResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.