Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Effect of Iron and Silicon on Growth and Yield of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)

Parasa Srihari; Biswarup Mehera; Buriga Teja Swaroop; et al.

9
claims
36
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present study highlights the effect of Iron and Silicon on growth and yield of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.). Si occurs primarily in soil solution as monosilicic acid (H4SiO4) at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 0.6 mm and is taken up by plants in this form. Silicon can mitigate the negative effects of abiotic stresses such as high temperature, freezing, drought, lodging, radiation, irradiation, and UV, as well as chemical stresses such as salt, nutrient imbalance, and metal toxicity. A field experiment was conducted during Zaid season 2022 at experimental field of Crop Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, Naini Agricultural Institute, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India. The soil at the test site had a sandy loam texture, a pH of 7.3 that was almost neutral, and low levels of available potassium (215.4 kg/ha), nitrogen (230 kg/ha), phosphorus (13.60 kg/ha), and organic carbon (0.48%). The treatments consist of foliar spray of iron (0.5, 1.0, 1.5 %) at 35, 45 DAS and Foliar spray of Silicon (0.5, 1.0, 1.5 ml/L) at 50 DAS along with control (RDF: 80:40:40 NPK Kg/ha). The experiment was layout in Randomized Block Design with ten treatments each replicated thrice. Significantly higher plant height (205.66 cm), maximum plant dry weight (133.2 g) and the yield attributes namely test weight (25.82 g), grains/earhead (2368.33), grain yield (2850.00 Kg/ha), stover yield (4004.67 Kg/ha), maximum gross return (84645.00 INR/ha), net return (52313.00 INR/ha) and benefit cost ratio (1.61) were obtained in the treatment 9 with the application of 1.50% Iron along with 1.50ml/L Si.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In sorghum, 1.50% iron foliar spray with 1.50 ml/L silicon (treatment 9) gave the highest plant height (205.66 cm) compared with the control.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
1.50% Iron along with 1.50ml/L Sie1
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
205.66 cme0
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significantly higher plant height (205.66 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1297 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment 9 with the application of 1.50% Iron along with 1.50ml/L Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1663 · show in text ↑
e2

“along with control (RDF: 80:40:40 NPK Kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In sorghum, 1.50% iron foliar spray with 1.50 ml/L silicon (treatment 9) gave the highest plant dry weight (133.2 g) compared with the control.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
1.50% Iron along with 1.50ml/L Sie1
Outcome
plant dry weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
133.2 ge0
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum plant dry weight (133.2 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1333 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment 9 with the application of 1.50% Iron along with 1.50ml/L Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1663 · show in text ↑
e2

“along with control (RDF: 80:40:40 NPK Kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In sorghum, 1.50% iron foliar spray with 1.50 ml/L silicon (treatment 9) gave the highest test weight (25.82 g) compared with the control.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
1.50% Iron along with 1.50ml/L Sie1
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
25.82 ge0
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“test weight (25.82 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1387 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment 9 with the application of 1.50% Iron along with 1.50ml/L Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1663 · show in text ↑
e2

“along with control (RDF: 80:40:40 NPK Kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In sorghum, 1.50% iron foliar spray with 1.50 ml/L silicon (treatment 9) gave the highest grains/earhead (2368.33) compared with the control.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
1.50% Iron along with 1.50ml/L Sie1
Outcome
grains/earheade0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
2368.33e0
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“grains/earhead (2368.33)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1413 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment 9 with the application of 1.50% Iron along with 1.50ml/L Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1663 · show in text ↑
e2

“along with control (RDF: 80:40:40 NPK Kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In sorghum, 1.50% iron foliar spray with 1.50 ml/L silicon (treatment 9) gave the highest grain yield (2850.00 Kg/ha) compared with the control.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
1.50% Iron along with 1.50ml/L Sie1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
2850.00 Kg/hae0
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“grain yield (2850.00 Kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1442 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment 9 with the application of 1.50% Iron along with 1.50ml/L Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1663 · show in text ↑
e2

“along with control (RDF: 80:40:40 NPK Kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In sorghum, 1.50% iron foliar spray with 1.50 ml/L silicon (treatment 9) gave the highest stover yield (4004.67 Kg/ha) compared with the control.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
1.50% Iron along with 1.50ml/L Sie1
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
4004.67 Kg/hae0
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“stover yield (4004.67 Kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1472 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment 9 with the application of 1.50% Iron along with 1.50ml/L Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1663 · show in text ↑
e2

“along with control (RDF: 80:40:40 NPK Kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In sorghum, 1.50% iron foliar spray with 1.50 ml/L silicon (treatment 9) gave the highest gross return (84645.00 INR/ha) compared with the control.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
1.50% Iron along with 1.50ml/L Sie1
Outcome
gross returne0
Direction
maximume0
Value
84645.00 INR/hae0
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum gross return (84645.00 INR/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1512 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment 9 with the application of 1.50% Iron along with 1.50ml/L Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1663 · show in text ↑
e2

“along with control (RDF: 80:40:40 NPK Kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In sorghum, 1.50% iron foliar spray with 1.50 ml/L silicon (treatment 9) gave the highest net return (52313.00 INR/ha) compared with the control.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
1.50% Iron along with 1.50ml/L Sie1
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
52313.00 INR/hae0
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“net return (52313.00 INR/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1542 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment 9 with the application of 1.50% Iron along with 1.50ml/L Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1663 · show in text ↑
e2

“along with control (RDF: 80:40:40 NPK Kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In sorghum, 1.50% iron foliar spray with 1.50 ml/L silicon (treatment 9) gave the highest benefit cost ratio (1.61) compared with the control.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
1.50% Iron along with 1.50ml/L Sie1
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
1.61e0
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“benefit cost ratio (1.61)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1547–1572 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatment 9 with the application of 1.50% Iron along with 1.50ml/L Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1663 · show in text ↑
e2

“along with control (RDF: 80:40:40 NPK Kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1153 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

silicon atom · growth · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

iron atom · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

iron atom · growth · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.