Paper · 2023 · Journal of Global Innovations in Agricultural Sciences

Determination of biochemical baseline of resistance against bacterial leaf spot of chilli after application of plant defense activators

Zaid Bin Tahir; Abuzar Hasnain

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Present study was designed to determine the progressive alterations in the leaves of chilli after the application of plant activators to pave the way towards fruitful management of bacterial leaf spots of chilli. Different plant defense activators such as KH2PO4, K2HPO4 and salicylic acid were used and alterations in the biochemicals of chilli were quantified by following standard protocols. In the first experiment, KH2PO4, K2HPO4 and salicylic acid were evaluated at a different concentration under field conditions. Application of salicylic acid expressed less disease incidence (21.111), followed by K2HPO4 (25.167) and KH2PO4 (28.889) as compared to the control. Alterations in biomolecules (SOD, POD, CAT, H2O2, TSS and TSP) were quantified with the application of salicylic acid (0.9285, 0.9297, 0.9347, 1.2278, 0.6663, 0.6804 and 0.6723) followed by K2HPO4 (0.6502, 0.6605, 0.6544, 0.7689, 0.5122, 0.5322 and 0.5222) and KH2PO4 (0.4729, 0.4713, 0.4778, 0.4522, 0.3544, 0.3744 and 0.3644) µg/g. Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) was used for the field experiments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid gave lower leaf spot incidence than the control.

Taxon
chillie1
Treatment
salicylic acide0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
lesse0
Value
21.111e0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of salicylic acid expressed less disease incidence (21.111), followed by K2HPO4 (25.167) and KH2PO4 (28.889) as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–669 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaves of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K2HPO4 gave disease incidence of 25.167, below KH2PO4.

Taxon
chillie1
Treatment
K2HPO4e0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
lesse0
Value
25.167e0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of salicylic acid expressed less disease incidence (21.111), followed by K2HPO4 (25.167) and KH2PO4 (28.889) as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–669 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaves of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KH2PO4 gave disease incidence of 28.889 relative to control.

Taxon
chillie1
Treatment
KH2PO4e0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
lesse0
Value
28.889e0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of salicylic acid expressed less disease incidence (21.111), followed by K2HPO4 (25.167) and KH2PO4 (28.889) as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–669 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaves of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid altered measured chilli biomolecules.

Taxon
chillie1
Treatment
salicylic acide0
Outcome
Alterations in biomolecules (SOD, POD, CAT, H2O2, TSS and TSP)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Alterations in biomolecules (SOD, POD, CAT, H2O2, TSS and TSP) were quantified with the application of salicylic acid (0.9285, 0.9297, 0.9347, 1.2278, 0.6663, 0.6804 and 0.6723)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–848 · show in text ↑
e1

“biochemicals of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K2HPO4 altered measured chilli biomolecules.

Taxon
chillie2
Treatment
K2HPO4e0
Outcome
Alterations in biomolecules (SOD, POD, CAT, H2O2, TSS and TSP)e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“followed by K2HPO4 (0.6502, 0.6605, 0.6544, 0.7689, 0.5122, 0.5322 and 0.5222)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–927 · show in text ↑
e1

“Alterations in biomolecules (SOD, POD, CAT, H2O2, TSS and TSP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–733 · show in text ↑
e2

“biochemicals of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KH2PO4 altered measured chilli biomolecules.

Taxon
chillie2
Treatment
KH2PO4e0
Outcome
Alterations in biomolecules (SOD, POD, CAT, H2O2, TSS and TSP)e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“KH2PO4 (0.4729, 0.4713, 0.4778, 0.4522, 0.3544, 0.3744 and 0.3644) µg/g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1003 · show in text ↑
e1

“Alterations in biomolecules (SOD, POD, CAT, H2O2, TSS and TSP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–733 · show in text ↑
e2

“biochemicals of chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–345 · show in text ↑

dipotassium hydrogen phosphate · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salicylic acid · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.