Paper · 2023 · Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment

Wild sunflower interference in common bean fields in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia

Amare Fufa; Taye Tessema; Zelalem Bekeko; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract The wild sunflower, an invasive alien species, is known to affect the performance of field crops. A field experiment was conducted to estimate the effects of different levels of wild sunflower and common bean densities on common bean yield components and grain yield, as well as to quantify yield loss due to their competition at varying densities. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design in a factorial arrangement with four replications. Hence, factorial combinations of three common bean densities and five wild sunflower densities were tested at two locations. At 24 plants m −2 , wild sunflower had maximum dry biomass of 413.84 and 549.83 g −2 at Adamitulu and Melkassa, respectively. An increase in wild sunflower density from 0 to 24 plants m −2 resulted in a reduction of pods per plant up to 62.41% and 83.11%, respectively, at Adamitulu and Melkassa. Compared to the weed‐free plot, the highest wild sunflower density (24 plants m −2 ) had a 4.6‐fold reduction in seed per pod. Weed‐free plots at Adamitulu and Melkassa yielded the highest grain yields of 2.77 and 3.37 t ha −1 , respectively. Common bean grain yield reduced by 88.12% and 67.64%, in Adamitulu and Melkassa, due to the highest density of wild sunflower. The rectangular hyperbolic equation fits common bean grain yields well. This study, hence, proposes that wild sunflower plants be kept at a density of no more than three plants per meter square to minimize severe yield loss and help common bean growers make decisions on wild sunflower control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 24 plants m-2, wild sunflower had a dry biomass of 413.84 g m-2 at Adamitulu

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
24 plants m −2e1
Interactor
wild sunflowere1weed
Outcome
dry biomasse1
Value
413.84e1
Qualifier
g −2e1
Setting
Adamitulue1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–49 · show in text ↑
e1

“At 24 plants m −2 , wild sunflower had maximum dry biomass of 413.84 and 549.83 g −2 at Adamitulu and Melkassa, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–724 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 24 plants m-2, wild sunflower had a dry biomass of 549.83 g m-2 at Melkassa

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
24 plants m −2e1
Interactor
wild sunflowere1weed
Outcome
dry biomasse1
Value
549.83e1
Qualifier
g −2e1
Setting
Melkassae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–49 · show in text ↑
e1

“At 24 plants m −2 , wild sunflower had maximum dry biomass of 413.84 and 549.83 g −2 at Adamitulu and Melkassa, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing wild sunflower density from 0 to 24 plants m-2 reduced common bean pods per plant by up to 62.41% at Adamitulu

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
wild sunflower density from 0 to 24 plants m −2e2
Interactor
wild sunflowere2weed
Outcome
pods per plante2
Direction
reductione2
Value
62.41%e2
Setting
Adamitulue2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–49 · show in text ↑
e2

“An increase in wild sunflower density from 0 to 24 plants m −2 resulted in a reduction of pods per plant up to 62.41% and 83.11%, respectively, at Adamitulu and Melkassa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing wild sunflower density from 0 to 24 plants m-2 reduced common bean pods per plant by up to 83.11% at Melkassa

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
wild sunflower density from 0 to 24 plants m −2e2
Interactor
wild sunflowere2weed
Outcome
pods per plante2
Direction
reductione2
Value
83.11%e2
Setting
Melkassae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–49 · show in text ↑
e2

“An increase in wild sunflower density from 0 to 24 plants m −2 resulted in a reduction of pods per plant up to 62.41% and 83.11%, respectively, at Adamitulu and Melkassa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest wild sunflower density reduced common bean seed per pod 4.6-fold relative to the weed-free plot

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
highest wild sunflower density (24 plants m −2)e3
Interactor
wild sunflowere3weed
Outcome
seed per pode3
Direction
reductione3
Value
4.6‐folde3
Comparator
weed‐free plote3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–49 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared to the weed‐free plot, the highest wild sunflower density (24 plants m −2) had a 4.6‐fold reduction in seed per pod”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 897–1022 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free common bean plots at Adamitulu had the highest grain yield, 2.77 t/ha

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
Weed‐freee4
Outcome
grain yieldse4
Direction
higheste4
Value
2.77e4
Qualifier
t ha −1e4
Setting
Adamitulue4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–49 · show in text ↑
e4

“Weed‐free plots at Adamitulu and Melkassa yielded the highest grain yields of 2.77 and 3.37 t ha −1, respectively”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1024–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free common bean plots at Melkassa had the highest grain yield, 3.37 t/ha

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
Weed‐freee4
Outcome
grain yieldse4
Direction
higheste4
Value
3.37e4
Qualifier
t ha −1e4
Setting
Melkassae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–49 · show in text ↑
e4

“Weed‐free plots at Adamitulu and Melkassa yielded the highest grain yields of 2.77 and 3.37 t ha −1, respectively”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1024–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest wild sunflower density reduced common bean grain yield by 88.12% at Adamitulu

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
highest density of wild sunflowere5
Interactor
wild sunflowere5weed
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
reducede5
Value
88.12%e5
Setting
Adamitulue5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–49 · show in text ↑
e5

“Common bean grain yield reduced by 88.12% and 67.64%, in Adamitulu and Melkassa, due to the highest density of wild sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest wild sunflower density reduced common bean grain yield by 67.64% at Melkassa

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
highest density of wild sunflowere5
Interactor
wild sunflowere5weed
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
reducede5
Value
67.64%e5
Setting
Melkassae5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–49 · show in text ↑
e5

“Common bean grain yield reduced by 88.12% and 67.64%, in Adamitulu and Melkassa, due to the highest density of wild sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1265 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rectangular hyperbolic equation fits common bean grain yields well

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
rectangular hyperbolic equatione6
Outcome
grain yieldse6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–49 · show in text ↑
e6

“The rectangular hyperbolic equation fits common bean grain yields well”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1337 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Wild sunflower density should be kept at no more than three plants per square meter to minimize severe yield loss

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Interactor
wild sunflowere7weed
Outcome
densitye7
Value
three plants per meter squaree7
Qualifier
to minimize severe yield losse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–49 · show in text ↑
e7

“wild sunflower plants be kept at a density of no more than three plants per meter square to minimize severe yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1490 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 42 positive, 21 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.