Paper · 2023 · Horticulturae

Applicability of Variable-Rate Nitrogen Top Dressing Based on Measurement of the Within-Field Variability of Soil Nutrients for Cabbage Production

Yuka Nakano; Shintaro Noda; Yasunari Miyake; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To improve the efficiency of nitrogen (N) fertilization, it is necessary to perform rapid direct measurements in the field rather than time-consuming laboratory-based chemical analysis. Herein, crop and soil data from the early stages of cabbage growth were acquired through two fall cultivations. Chlorophyll meter value, height, and projected leaf area were evaluated as crop indicators. A positive correlation was observed between the projected leaf area or its rate of increase 2–3 weeks after transplantation and head fresh weight (FW). After comparing two water-content reflectometers (WCR) and a nitrate sensor, we selected a WCR with a 12 cm-long rod as the soil indicator. The diagnostic method was verified using varying amounts of N basal fertilizer during spring cultivation. The variable rate of N top dressing (25, 50, and 75% total N) based on the electrical conductivity (EC) 14 days after transplantation reduced the subsequent EC variability. No differences in head FW were observed between the treatments. A 25% reduction in N fertilizer was considered possible for half of the plots. The quantity of inorganic N extracted by potassium chloride from the crop soil after cultivation was unaffected by the amount of N fertilizer. Therefore, the diagnostic method proposed herein is suitable for soil N management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Projected leaf area or its increase correlated positively with head fresh weight.

Organ / stage
projected leaf areae0
Outcome
head fresh weight (FW)e0
Direction
positive correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“positive correlation was observed between the projected leaf area or its rate of increase 2–3 weeks after transplantation and head fresh weight (FW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–540 · show in text ↑
e1

“cabbage growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–252 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A reflectometer with a 12 cm rod was selected as the soil indicator.

Outcome
soil indicatore0
Value
12 cm-longe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“selected a WCR with a 12 cm-long rod as the soil indicator”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–680 · show in text ↑
e1

“cabbage growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variable nitrogen top dressing reduced later soil electrical conductivity variability.

Treatment
variable rate of N top dressing (25, 50, and 75% total N)e0
Outcome
subsequent EC variabilitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variable rate of N top dressing (25, 50, and 75% total N) based on the electrical conductivity (EC) 14 days after transplantation reduced the subsequent EC variability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–959 · show in text ↑
e1

“cabbage growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Head fresh weight did not differ among treatments.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
head FWe0
Direction
No differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No differences in head FW were observed between the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1023 · show in text ↑
e1

“cabbage growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–252 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A 25% nitrogen fertilizer reduction was considered feasible for half the plots.

Outcome
25% reduction in N fertilizere0
Qualifier
half of the plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 25% reduction in N fertilizer was considered possible for half of the plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1102 · show in text ↑
e1

“cabbage growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extractable soil inorganic nitrogen after cultivation was unaffected by fertilizer amount.

Treatment
amount of N fertilizere0
Outcome
quantity of inorganic N extracted by potassium chloride from the crop soil after cultivatione0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quantity of inorganic N extracted by potassium chloride from the crop soil after cultivation was unaffected by the amount of N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1245 · show in text ↑
e1

“cabbage growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–252 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The diagnostic method was judged suitable for soil nitrogen management.

Outcome
suitable for soil N managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“diagnostic method proposed herein is suitable for soil N management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1329 · show in text ↑
e1

“cabbage growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–252 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 26 positive, 1 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 35 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.