Paper · 2023 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Effect of Foliar Feeding with Copper Nanoparticles on Growth and Yield of Broccoli Crosses

Aziz Mahdi Abd Al-Shamry; Diana Khudair Abbas

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The test was conducted in 2021-2022 at the Horticulture and Landscape Department fields - agriculture collage – Diyala University. The study was to examin the result of foliar spray through nano and chelated copper on the growth and production of broccoli hybrids. The foliar spray was used at three levels (0 mg.L -1 , 10 mg.L -1 , 20 mg.L -1 , 40 mg.L -1 ) whereas five cultivars (v) of broccoli were used and these are: Jassmine (V1), 2004 (V2), Zen (V3), Masturi (V4), and Danar (V5). The results have shown that foliar application of nano copper has significantly affected on the crop growth and production. The highest production was 67.82 t.h -1 and and most of the vegetative and fruitful growth traits were at a concentration of nano-copper 20 mg.L -1 . Whereas the results of the effect of foliar spray on broccoli varieties, the V2 has the highest florets 1.363 kg and the total yield was (56.81 h -1 ) and the chlorophyll index in the leaves was 0.801, and the florets content of carbohydrates, the Danar variety excelled in the leaf area, which amounted to 175.49, while the Matsuri variety excelled in the height of the plant, with an average height of 98.55 cm.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano copper foliar application significantly affected broccoli growth and production.

Treatment
foliar application of nano coppere0
Outcome
crop growth and productione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of nano copper has significantly affected on the crop growth and production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano copper at 20 mg.L -1 produced the highest yield, 67.82 t.h -1.

Treatment
nano-copper 20 mg.L -1e0
Outcome
productione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
67.82 t.h -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest production was 67.82 t.h -1 and and most of the vegetative and fruitful growth traits were at a concentration of nano-copper 20 mg.L -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most vegetative and fruitful growth traits were highest at nano copper 20 mg.L -1.

Treatment
nano-copper 20 mg.L -1e0
Outcome
vegetative and fruitful growth traitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most of the vegetative and fruitful growth traits were at a concentration of nano-copper 20 mg.L -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V2 had the highest floret mass of 1.363 kg.

Material
V2e0
Outcome
floretse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.363 kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the V2 has the highest florets 1.363 kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–884 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 74–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V2 total yield was 56.81 h -1.

Outcome
total yielde0
Value
56.81 h -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total yield was (56.81 h -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 74–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V2 leaf chlorophyll index was 0.801.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
chlorophyll indexe0
Value
0.801e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the chlorophyll index in the leaves was 0.801”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 74–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Danar had the greatest leaf area, 175.49.

Material
Danare0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
excellede0
Value
175.49e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Danar variety excelled in the leaf area, which amounted to 175.49”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1085 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 74–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Matsuri had the greatest plant height, averaging 98.55 cm.

Material
Matsurie0
Outcome
height of the plante0
Direction
excellede0
Value
98.55 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Matsuri variety excelled in the height of the plant, with an average height of 98.55 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1184 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 74–82 · show in text ↑

copper atom · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

application · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

110 papers: 104 positive, 6 negative or no effect

103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

106 papers more in this group

See all 110 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.