Paper · 2023 · PeerJ

Responses of maize hybrids to water stress conditions at different developmental stages: accumulation of reactive oxygen species, activity of enzymatic antioxidants and degradation in kernel quality traits

Muhammad Irfan Yousaf; Muhammad Waheed Riaz; Aamar Shehzad; et al.

15
claims
48
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Sustainable maize production under changing climatic conditions, especially heat and water stress conditions is one of the key challenges that need to be addressed immediately. The current field study was designed to evaluate the impact of water stress on morpho-physiological, biochemical, reactive oxygen species, antioxidant activity and kernel quality traits at different plant growth stages in maize hybrids. Four indigenous i.e ., YH-5427, YH-5482, YH-5395, JPL-1908, and one multinational maize hybrid i.e ., NK-8441 (Syngenta Seeds) were used for the study. Four stress treatments (i) Control (ii) 3-week water stress at pre-flowering stage (iii) 3-week water stress at anthesis stage (iv) 3-week water stress at grain filling/post-anthesis stage. The presence of significant oxidative stress was revealed by the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROXs) i.e ., H 2 O 2 (1.9 to 5.8 µmole g −1 FW) and malondialdehyde (120.5 to 169.0 nmole g −1 FW) leading to severe negative impacts on kernel yield. Moreover, a severe reduction in photosynthetic ability (50.6%, from 34.0 to 16.8 µmole m −2 s −1 ), lower transpirational rate (31.3%, from 3.2 to 2.2 mmol m −2 s −1 ), alterations in plant anatomy, reduced pigments stability, and deterioration of kernel quality was attributed to water stress. Water stress affected all the three studied growth stages, the pre-flowering stage being the most vulnerable while the post-anthesis stage was the least affected stage to drought stress. Antioxidant activity was observed to increase under all stress conditions in all maize hybrids, however, the highest antioxidant activity was recorded at the anthesis stage and in maize hybrids YH-5427 i.e ., T-SOD activity was increased by 61.3% from 37.5 U mg −1 pro to 60.5 U mg −1 pro while CAT activity was maximum under water stress conditions 8.3 U mg −1 pro as compared to 10.3 U mg −1 pro under control (19.3%). The overall performance of maize hybrid YH-5427 was much more promising than other hybrids, attributed to its higher photosynthetic activity, and better antioxidant defense mechanism. Therefore, this hybrid could be recommended for cultivation in drought-prone areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased hydrogen peroxide in maize hybrids to 1.9–5.8 µmole g−1 FW.

Taxon
maize hybridst0
Treatment
water stresse2
Outcome
H 2 O 2e0
Direction
overproductione0
Value
1.9 to 5.8 µmole g −1 FWe0
Comparator
Controle3

Verbatim

e0

“overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROXs) i.e ., H 2 O 2 (1.9 to 5.8 µmole g −1 FW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–911 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–26 · show in text ↑
e2

“CAT activity was maximum under water stress conditions 8.3 U mg −1 pro as compared to 10.3 U mg −1 pro under control (19.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1916 · show in text ↑
e3

“CAT activity was maximum under water stress conditions 8.3 U mg −1 pro as compared to 10.3 U mg −1 pro under control (19.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased malondialdehyde in maize hybrids to 120.5–169.0 nmole g−1 FW.

Taxon
maize hybridst0
Treatment
water stresse2
Outcome
malondialdehydee0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
120.5 to 169.0 nmole g −1 FWe0
Comparator
Controle3

Verbatim

e0

“malondialdehyde (120.5 to 169.0 nmole g −1 FW) leading to severe negative impacts on kernel yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–26 · show in text ↑
e2

“CAT activity was maximum under water stress conditions 8.3 U mg −1 pro as compared to 10.3 U mg −1 pro under control (19.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1916 · show in text ↑
e3

“CAT activity was maximum under water stress conditions 8.3 U mg −1 pro as compared to 10.3 U mg −1 pro under control (19.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1916 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxidative stress negatively affected kernel yield.

Taxon
maize hybridst0
Compound
reactive oxygen species (ROXs)e0
Outcome
kernel yielde0
Direction
negative impactse0

Verbatim

e0

“overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROXs) i.e ., H 2 O 2 (1.9 to 5.8 µmole g −1 FW) and malondialdehyde (120.5 to 169.0 nmole g −1 FW) leading to severe negative impacts on kernel yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced photosynthetic ability by 50.6%.

Taxon
maize hybridst0
Treatment
water stresse2
Outcome
photosynthetic abilitye0
Direction
reductione0
Value
50.6%e0
Comparator
Controle3

Verbatim

e0

“severe reduction in photosynthetic ability (50.6%, from 34.0 to 16.8 µmole m −2 s −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–26 · show in text ↑
e2

“CAT activity was maximum under water stress conditions 8.3 U mg −1 pro as compared to 10.3 U mg −1 pro under control (19.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1916 · show in text ↑
e3

“CAT activity was maximum under water stress conditions 8.3 U mg −1 pro as compared to 10.3 U mg −1 pro under control (19.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress lowered transpiration rate by 31.3%.

Taxon
maize hybridst0
Treatment
water stresse2
Outcome
transpirational ratee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
31.3%e0
Comparator
Controle3

Verbatim

e0

“lower transpirational rate (31.3%, from 3.2 to 2.2 mmol m −2 s −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1182 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–26 · show in text ↑
e2

“CAT activity was maximum under water stress conditions 8.3 U mg −1 pro as compared to 10.3 U mg −1 pro under control (19.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1916 · show in text ↑
e3

“CAT activity was maximum under water stress conditions 8.3 U mg −1 pro as compared to 10.3 U mg −1 pro under control (19.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress altered plant anatomy.

Taxon
maize hybridst0
Treatment
water stresse2
Outcome
plant anatomye0
Comparator
Controle3

Not reportedDirectionValue

Verbatim

e0

“alterations in plant anatomy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–26 · show in text ↑
e2

“CAT activity was maximum under water stress conditions 8.3 U mg −1 pro as compared to 10.3 U mg −1 pro under control (19.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1916 · show in text ↑
e3

“CAT activity was maximum under water stress conditions 8.3 U mg −1 pro as compared to 10.3 U mg −1 pro under control (19.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced pigment stability.

Taxon
maize hybridst0
Treatment
water stresse2
Outcome
pigments stabilitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
Controle3

Not reportedValue

Verbatim

e0

“reduced pigments stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1240 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–26 · show in text ↑
e2

“CAT activity was maximum under water stress conditions 8.3 U mg −1 pro as compared to 10.3 U mg −1 pro under control (19.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1916 · show in text ↑
e3

“CAT activity was maximum under water stress conditions 8.3 U mg −1 pro as compared to 10.3 U mg −1 pro under control (19.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress deteriorated kernel quality.

Taxon
maize hybridst0
Treatment
water stresse2
Outcome
kernel qualitye0
Direction
deterioratione0
Comparator
Controle3

Not reportedValue

Verbatim

e0

“deterioration of kernel quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1277 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–26 · show in text ↑
e2

“CAT activity was maximum under water stress conditions 8.3 U mg −1 pro as compared to 10.3 U mg −1 pro under control (19.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1916 · show in text ↑
e3

“CAT activity was maximum under water stress conditions 8.3 U mg −1 pro as compared to 10.3 U mg −1 pro under control (19.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1916 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-flowering was the most vulnerable stage and post-anthesis the least affected by water stress.

Taxon
maize hybridst0
Organ / stage
pre-flowering stagee0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
most vulnerablee0

Verbatim

e0

“the pre-flowering stage being the most vulnerable while the post-anthesis stage was the least affected stage to drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1495 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant activity increased under all stress conditions in all maize hybrids.

Taxon
maize hybridse0
Treatment
all stress conditionse0
Outcome
Antioxidant activitye0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
Controle1

Verbatim

e0

“Antioxidant activity was observed to increase under all stress conditions in all maize hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1591 · show in text ↑
e1

“CAT activity was maximum under water stress conditions 8.3 U mg −1 pro as compared to 10.3 U mg −1 pro under control (19.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1916 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest antioxidant activity occurred at anthesis.

Taxon
maize hybridst0
Organ / stage
anthesis stagee0
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

e0

“the highest antioxidant activity was recorded at the anthesis stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1602–1669 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased T-SOD activity in YH-5427 by 61.3%.

Taxon
maize hybridse0
Material
YH-5427e1
Treatment
water stresse2
Gene
T-SODe0
Outcome
T-SOD activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
61.3%e0
Comparator
Controle3

Verbatim

e0

“maize hybrids YH-5427 i.e ., T-SOD activity was increased by 61.3% from 37.5 U mg −1 pro to 60.5 U mg −1 pro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1677–1785 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize hybrids YH-5427 i.e ., T-SOD activity was increased by 61.3% from 37.5 U mg −1 pro to 60.5 U mg −1 pro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1677–1785 · show in text ↑
e2

“CAT activity was maximum under water stress conditions 8.3 U mg −1 pro as compared to 10.3 U mg −1 pro under control (19.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1916 · show in text ↑
e3

“CAT activity was maximum under water stress conditions 8.3 U mg −1 pro as compared to 10.3 U mg −1 pro under control (19.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CAT activity in YH-5427 under water stress was 8.3 U mg−1 pro, compared with 10.3 under control.

Taxon
maize hybridst0
Material
YH-5427e2
Treatment
water stress conditionse0
Gene
CATe0
Outcome
CAT activitye0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
8.3 U mg −1 proe0
Qualifier
10.3 U mg −1 proe0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“CAT activity was maximum under water stress conditions 8.3 U mg −1 pro as compared to 10.3 U mg −1 pro under control (19.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1792–1916 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–26 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize hybrids YH-5427 i.e ., T-SOD activity was increased by 61.3% from 37.5 U mg −1 pro to 60.5 U mg −1 pro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1677–1785 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

YH-5427 performed better than the other hybrids.

Taxon
maize hybride0
Material
YH-5427e1
Outcome
overall performancee0
Direction
much more promisinge0
Comparator
other hybridse0

Verbatim

e0

“The overall performance of maize hybrid YH-5427 was much more promising than other hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1918–2008 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize hybrids YH-5427 i.e ., T-SOD activity was increased by 61.3% from 37.5 U mg −1 pro to 60.5 U mg −1 pro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1677–1785 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend YH-5427 for cultivation in drought-prone areas.

Taxon
maize hybridst0
Material
YH-5427e2
Outcome
cultivation in drought-prone arease0

Verbatim

e0

“this hybrid could be recommended for cultivation in drought-prone areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2113–2184 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–26 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize hybrids YH-5427 i.e ., T-SOD activity was increased by 61.3% from 37.5 U mg −1 pro to 60.5 U mg −1 pro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1677–1785 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

60 papers: 32 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

drought · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 10 positive, 75 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

drought · physiology: oxidative · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

96 papers: 8 positive, 88 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

92 papers more in this group

See all 96 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 13 positive, 108 negative or no effect

107 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

117 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.