Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Pest Management

Efficacy of single and combined release of Phytoseiulus persimilis and Amblyseius swirskii at different release ratios for control of Tetranychus urticae and Frankliniella occidentalis on rose plants

Samaneh Yari; Hamidreza Hajiqanbar; Azadeh Farazmand; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Single and combined release of Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot and Amblyseius swirskii Athias-Henriot was tested for control of Tetranychus urticae Koch and Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergand) on rose plants. The efficacy of the predators was evaluated at predator:prey ratios of 1:2, 1:5, 1:10, 1:20, 1:50 and 1:100 in laboratory experiments, and release rates of 20, 40 and 100 predators per m2 in microcosm experiments. In all treatments, release of predator(s) significantly decreased T. urticae population and larval population of F. occidentalis compared to the control treatment. In laboratory experiment, the most suppression of T. urticae occurred in predator:prey ratios of 1:2 and 1:5 that decreased 95% and 93.5% of T. urticae after 24 h, respectively. In microcosm experiments, release rates of 100 and 40 P. persimilis per m2 eradicated (100%) the T. urticae population at 30 days after releasing the predator. Based on our findings, P. persimilis and A. swirskii can be released simultaneously at the rates of 20 and 100 individuals per m2, respectively for successful control of T. urticae and F. occidentalis on rose plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Predator releases significantly decreased T. urticae populations relative to controls.

Taxon
rose plantst0
Treatment
release of predator(s)e0
Interactor
T. urticaeTetranychus urticaee0pest
Outcome
T. urticae populatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In all treatments, release of predator(s) significantly decreased T. urticae population and larval population of F. occidentalis compared to the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–594 · show in text ↑
t0

“rose plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 188–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Predator releases significantly decreased F. occidentalis larvae relative to controls.

Taxon
rose plantst0
Treatment
release of predator(s)e0
Interactor
F. occidentalisFrankliniella occidentalise0pest
Outcome
larval population of F. occidentalise0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Frankliniella occidentalis
Frankliniella occidentalis · InteractorFrank Peairs, Colorado State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In all treatments, release of predator(s) significantly decreased T. urticae population and larval population of F. occidentalis compared to the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–594 · show in text ↑
t0

“rose plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 188–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 1:2 predator to prey ratio reduced T. urticae by 95% after 24 hours.

Taxon
rose plantst0
Treatment
1:2e0
Interactor
T. urticaeTetranychus urticaee0pest
Outcome
T. urticaee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
95%e0
Qualifier
after 24 he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“predator:prey ratios of 1:2 and 1:5 that decreased 95% and 93.5% of T. urticae after 24 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–757 · show in text ↑
t0

“rose plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 188–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 1:5 predator to prey ratio reduced T. urticae by 93.5% after 24 hours.

Taxon
rose plantst0
Treatment
1:5e0
Interactor
T. urticaeTetranychus urticaee0pest
Outcome
T. urticaee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
93.5%e0
Qualifier
after 24 he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“predator:prey ratios of 1:2 and 1:5 that decreased 95% and 93.5% of T. urticae after 24 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–757 · show in text ↑
t0

“rose plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 188–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Releasing 100 P. persimilis per square metre eradicated T. urticae after 30 days.

Taxon
rose plantst0
Treatment
100 and 40 P. persimilis per m2e0
Interactor
T. urticaeTetranychus urticaee0pest
Second interactor
P. persimilisPhytoseiulus persimilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
T. urticae populatione0
Direction
eradicatede0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytoseiulus persimilis
Phytoseiulus persimilis · Second interactorMick Talbot · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“release rates of 100 and 40 P. persimilis per m2 eradicated (100%) the T. urticae population at 30 days after releasing the predator”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–931 · show in text ↑
t0

“rose plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 188–199 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend simultaneous release of P. persimilis at 20 and A. swirskii at 100 per square metre to control both rose pests.

Taxon
rose plantse0
Treatment
P. persimilis and A. swirskii can be released simultaneously at the rates of 20 and 100 individuals per m2e0
Interactor
T. urticaeTetranychus urticaee0pest
Second interactor
F. occidentalisFrankliniella occidentalise0pest
Outcome
successful control of T. urticae and F. occidentalise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Frankliniella occidentalis
Frankliniella occidentalis · Second interactorFrank Peairs, Colorado State University, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. persimilis and A. swirskii can be released simultaneously at the rates of 20 and 100 individuals per m2, respectively for successful control of T. urticae and F. occidentalis on rose plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1148 · show in text ↑

Phytoseiulus persimilis · Tetranychus urticae · RosaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

biocontrol · Frankliniella occidentalis · RosaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

biocontrol · Tetranychus urticae · RosaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.