Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during Rabi season 2018-2019 at Doon (P.G.) College of Agriculture Science and Technology, Selaqui, Dehradun (Uttarakhand) using four herbicides, with Hand Weeding applied for effectively controlling of weeds, their effect on yield and production economics on Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) variety used ‘Pant Gram-186’. The dominant weed species were among monocot weeds were Phalaris minor, Cynodon dactylon, Brachiaria mutica, and Cyperus rotundus, and the dicot weed species Parthenium hysterophorus, Medicago denticulate, Convolvulus arvensis, Melilotus indica, Chenopodium album, were observed during the growing season. Weed dry weight of monocot and dicot weed was the lowest observed in hand weeding carried out 30 and 60 days after sowing. Higher Weed control efficiency up to (93.11 %) was recorded by Hand weeding at 30 and 60 days after sowing. This treatment too recorded greater yield attributes and seed and Stover yield (1811 kg/ha and 2247 kg/ha) and maximum net monetary return (Rs 35016) and Benefit: Cost ratio and 1.88.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Hand weeding at 30 and 60 days gave the lowest monocot and dicot weed dry weight.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- hand weeding carried out 30 and 60 days after sowinge0
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- Weed dry weight of monocot and dicot weede0
- Direction
- loweste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Weed dry weight of monocot and dicot weed was the lowest observed in hand weeding carried out 30 and 60 days after sowing.”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Hand weeding at 30 and 60 days achieved 93.11% weed control efficiency.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Hand weeding at 30 and 60 days after sowinge0
- Interactor
- Weede0weed
- Outcome
- Weed control efficiencye0
- Direction
- Highere0
- Value
- 93.11 %e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Higher Weed control efficiency up to (93.11 %) was recorded by Hand weeding at 30 and 60 days after sowing.”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Hand weeding produced greater yield attributes.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- yield attributese0
- Direction
- greatere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This treatment too recorded greater yield attributes”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Hand weeding produced seed yield of 1811 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- seede0
- Value
- 1811 kg/hae0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed and Stover yield (1811 kg/ha and 2247 kg/ha)”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Hand weeding produced stover yield of 2247 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- Stover yielde0
- Value
- 2247 kg/hae0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed and Stover yield (1811 kg/ha and 2247 kg/ha)”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Hand weeding gave the maximum net monetary return of Rs 35016.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- net monetary returne0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- Rs 35016e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum net monetary return (Rs 35016)”
t0“chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Hand weeding gave a benefit to cost ratio of 1.88.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Outcome
- Benefit: Cost ratioe0
- Value
- 1.88e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Benefit: Cost ratio and 1.88”
t0“chickpea”
The same questions in other papers
herbicide · weed · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
71 papers more in this group
See all 75 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.