Paper · 2023 · Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology

Brevibacillus DesertYSK and Rhizobium MAP7 stimulate the growth and pigmentation of Lactuca sativa L.

Amr M. Mowafy; Sherouk Khalifa; Ashraf Elsayed

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Applying microbial biostimulants during crop cultivation allows for higher sustainability levels. It reduces the need for fertilizers and environmental contaminants while enhancing plant quality. This study assessed 13 endophytic bacteria, 4 newly isolated, and 9 donated, for plant growth-promoting capabilities. Quantitative assessments of indole acetic acid (IAA), gibberellic acid (GA3), siderophores, ammonia, exopolysaccharides, volatile HCN, and phosphate solubilization, along with Bray–Curtis cluster analyses were performed. Upon the results we selected RhizobiumMAP7, Brevibacillus DesertYSK, Pseudomonas MAP8, BacillusMAP3, Brevibacillus MAP, and Bacillus DeltaYSK to evaluate their effects on Lactuca sativa growth and pigmentation in a 30-day greenhouse pot experiment. Both Brevibacillus DesertYSK and Rhizobium MAP7surpassed other strains in growth promotional effects. They doubled shoot length (12 and 12.3 cm, respectively, when compared with 7 cm for control after 30 days), and fresh weight (0.079 and 0.084 g, respectively, when compared with 0.045 g for control after 30 days), and increased root length by at least 3-fold when compared with control (4.5 and 3.5 cm, respectively, when compared with 1.2 cm for control after 30 days). Chlorophyll content also exhibited at least a 2-fold significant increase in response to bacterization compared with control. This strain superiority was consistent with the in vitro assays data that showed strains capability as IAA and GA3producers. Also, strains were highly capable ammonia and siderophore producers and phosphate solubilizers, providing considerable hormone and nutrient levels for L. sativa plantsleading to improved growth parameters and appearance. These data support the notion that nodule-based bacteria are potential plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) that may be used on a wider scale rather than just for legumes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brevibacillus DesertYSK increased shoot length to 12 versus control.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa L.Lactuca sativat0
Treatment
Brevibacillus DesertYSKe0
Interactor
Brevibacillus DesertYSKe0symbiont
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
doublede0
Value
12e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lactuca sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Both Brevibacillus DesertYSK and Rhizobium MAP7surpassed other strains in growth promotional effects. They doubled shoot length (12 and 12.3 cm, respectively, when compared with 7 cm for control after 30 days), and fresh weight (0.079 and 0.084 g, respectively, when compared with 0.045 g for control after 30 days), and increased root length by at least 3-fold when compared with control (4.5 and 3.5 cm, respectively, when compared with 1.2 cm for control after 30 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–1256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium MAP7 increased shoot length to 12.3 cm versus control.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa L.Lactuca sativat0
Treatment
Rhizobium MAP7e0
Interactor
Rhizobium MAP7e0symbiont
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
doublede0
Value
12.3 cme0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lactuca sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Both Brevibacillus DesertYSK and Rhizobium MAP7surpassed other strains in growth promotional effects. They doubled shoot length (12 and 12.3 cm, respectively, when compared with 7 cm for control after 30 days), and fresh weight (0.079 and 0.084 g, respectively, when compared with 0.045 g for control after 30 days), and increased root length by at least 3-fold when compared with control (4.5 and 3.5 cm, respectively, when compared with 1.2 cm for control after 30 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–1256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brevibacillus DesertYSK increased fresh weight to 0.079 versus control.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa L.Lactuca sativat0
Treatment
Brevibacillus DesertYSKe0
Interactor
Brevibacillus DesertYSKe0symbiont
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
doublede0
Value
0.079e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lactuca sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Both Brevibacillus DesertYSK and Rhizobium MAP7surpassed other strains in growth promotional effects. They doubled shoot length (12 and 12.3 cm, respectively, when compared with 7 cm for control after 30 days), and fresh weight (0.079 and 0.084 g, respectively, when compared with 0.045 g for control after 30 days), and increased root length by at least 3-fold when compared with control (4.5 and 3.5 cm, respectively, when compared with 1.2 cm for control after 30 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–1256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium MAP7 increased fresh weight to 0.084 g versus control.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa L.Lactuca sativat0
Treatment
Rhizobium MAP7e0
Interactor
Rhizobium MAP7e0symbiont
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
doublede0
Value
0.084 ge0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lactuca sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Both Brevibacillus DesertYSK and Rhizobium MAP7surpassed other strains in growth promotional effects. They doubled shoot length (12 and 12.3 cm, respectively, when compared with 7 cm for control after 30 days), and fresh weight (0.079 and 0.084 g, respectively, when compared with 0.045 g for control after 30 days), and increased root length by at least 3-fold when compared with control (4.5 and 3.5 cm, respectively, when compared with 1.2 cm for control after 30 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–1256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brevibacillus DesertYSK increased root length to 4.5 versus control.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa L.Lactuca sativat0
Treatment
Brevibacillus DesertYSKe0
Interactor
Brevibacillus DesertYSKe0symbiont
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
doublede0
Value
4.5e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lactuca sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Both Brevibacillus DesertYSK and Rhizobium MAP7surpassed other strains in growth promotional effects. They doubled shoot length (12 and 12.3 cm, respectively, when compared with 7 cm for control after 30 days), and fresh weight (0.079 and 0.084 g, respectively, when compared with 0.045 g for control after 30 days), and increased root length by at least 3-fold when compared with control (4.5 and 3.5 cm, respectively, when compared with 1.2 cm for control after 30 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–1256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium MAP7 increased root length to 3.5 cm versus control.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa L.Lactuca sativat0
Treatment
Rhizobium MAP7e0
Interactor
Rhizobium MAP7e0symbiont
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
doublede0
Value
3.5 cme0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lactuca sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Both Brevibacillus DesertYSK and Rhizobium MAP7surpassed other strains in growth promotional effects. They doubled shoot length (12 and 12.3 cm, respectively, when compared with 7 cm for control after 30 days), and fresh weight (0.079 and 0.084 g, respectively, when compared with 0.045 g for control after 30 days), and increased root length by at least 3-fold when compared with control (4.5 and 3.5 cm, respectively, when compared with 1.2 cm for control after 30 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–1256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterization significantly increased lettuce chlorophyll content at least twofold.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa L.Lactuca sativat0
Treatment
bacterizatione0
Outcome
Chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2-folde0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lactuca sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“Chlorophyll content also exhibited at least a 2-fold significant increase in response to bacterization compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1382 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The strains produced IAA and GA3 in vitro.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa L.Lactuca sativat0
Interactor
strainse0symbiont
Outcome
IAA and GA3producerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lactuca sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“strains capability as IAA and GA3producers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1507 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The strains were capable ammonia and siderophore producers and phosphate solubilizers.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa L.Lactuca sativat0
Interactor
strainse0symbiont
Outcome
ammonia and siderophore producers and phosphate solubilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lactuca sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“strains were highly capable ammonia and siderophore producers and phosphate solubilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1603 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest broader use of nodule-based bacteria as plant growth promoters.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa L.Lactuca sativat0
Outcome
may be used on a wider scale rather than just for legumese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lactuca sativa L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“nodule-based bacteria are potential plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) that may be used on a wider scale rather than just for legumes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1765–1902 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.