Paper · 2023 · Agronomy

The Effect of Molybdenum Fertilizer on the Growth of Grass–Legume Mixtures Related to Symbiotic Rhizobium

Jing Zhou; Xiao Sun; Chao Chen; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Molybdenum (Mo) is required by the enzymes involved in many metabolic processes related to plant growth and development. However, the effects of Mo addition on plant growth and beneficial microorganisms in mixed grasslands are unclear. We conducted a greenhouse experiment to examine the effects of different Mo addition levels (10 and 20 mg Mo kg−1 soil in the form of Na2MoO4) on the growth of perennial ryegrass–white clover in two low-Mo soils, as well as their symbiotic microorganisms. Our results showed that the addition of Mo had a significant impact on plant growth in limestone soil but not in yellow loam soil (p < 0.05). Compared with no addition of Mo fertilizer in limestone soil, an addition of 10 mg Mo kg−1 significantly increased the plant community shoot and root biomass (p < 0.05). However, this improvement was not observed with an addition of 20 mg Mo kg−1. The shoot nitrogen and phosphorus content in both soil types was unaffected by the Mo addition (p > 0.05), whereas the 10 mg Mo kg−1 addition significantly increased the shoot nitrogen and phosphorus uptake in limestone soil (p < 0.05). This increase in plant community productivity was primarily due to the increased growth of both species, caused by the enhanced activation of the symbiotic rhizobium. We conclude that Mo supply may promote N utilization and uptake in mixed grassland by increasing the activity of symbiotic rhizobium, resulting in a higher yield of mixed grassland, which is critical for sustainable agricultural development in low-Mo soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mo addition significantly affected plant growth in limestone soil.

Taxon
perennial ryegrass–white cloverTrifolium repensLolium perennee1
Treatment
addition of Moe0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Setting
limestone soile0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of Mo had a significant impact on plant growth in limestone soil but not in yellow loam soil (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–632 · show in text ↑
e1

“perennial ryegrass–white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mo addition did not significantly affect plant growth in yellow loam soil.

Taxon
perennial ryegrass–white cloverTrifolium repensLolium perennee1
Treatment
addition of Moe0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Setting
yellow loam soile0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the addition of Mo had a significant impact on plant growth in limestone soil but not in yellow loam soil (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–632 · show in text ↑
e1

“perennial ryegrass–white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 mg Mo kg−1 in limestone soil, shoot and root biomass increased significantly over no fertilizer.

Taxon
perennial ryegrass–white cloverTrifolium repensLolium perennee1
Treatment
10 mg Mo kg−1e0
Outcome
plant community shoot and root biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
no addition of Mo fertilizere0
Setting
limestone soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with no addition of Mo fertilizer in limestone soil, an addition of 10 mg Mo kg−1 significantly increased the plant community shoot and root biomass (p < 0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grass–Legume Mixtures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“perennial ryegrass–white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The biomass improvement was absent at 20 mg Mo kg−1.

Taxon
Grass–Legume Mixturest0
Treatment
20 mg Mo kg−1e0
Outcome
improvemente0
Direction
not observede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“However, this improvement was not observed with an addition of 20 mg Mo kg−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grass–Legume Mixtures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mo addition did not significantly affect shoot nitrogen and phosphorus content in either soil.

Taxon
Grass–Legume Mixturest0
Treatment
Mo additione0
Outcome
shoot nitrogen and phosphorus contente0
Direction
unaffectede0
Setting
both soil typese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The shoot nitrogen and phosphorus content in both soil types was unaffected by the Mo addition (p > 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grass–Legume Mixtures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“perennial ryegrass–white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 mg Mo kg−1, shoot nitrogen and phosphorus uptake increased significantly in limestone soil.

Taxon
Grass–Legume Mixturest0
Treatment
10 mg Mo kg−1 additione0
Outcome
shoot nitrogen and phosphorus uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
limestone soile0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the 10 mg Mo kg−1 addition significantly increased the shoot nitrogen and phosphorus uptake in limestone soil (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grass–Legume Mixtures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“perennial ryegrass–white clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–427 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced symbiotic rhizobium activation was attributed as the cause of increased growth of both species.

Taxon
Grass–Legume Mixturest0
Interactor
symbiotic rhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
increased growth of both speciese0
Qualifier
enhanced activatione0

Verbatim

e0

“increased growth of both species, caused by the enhanced activation of the symbiotic rhizobium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grass–Legume Mixtures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–74 · show in text ↑

molybdenum atom · growth · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.