Paper · 2022 · Genetika

Variation of harvest index of wheat and triticale in monocrops and intercrops system of cultivation

Milosav Grcak; Dragan Grcak; Radivoje Jevtic; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The harvest index of grain can be used as indicator for the potential yield of crop. The aim of this study was to determine the variation of the harvest index for wheat and triticale and differences in monocrops and intercrops systems of cultivation under different field environmental conditions. The experiment, carried out in field conditions for two consecutive years, was designed according to a randomized block system so that each species was sown in two cultivation systems as a single crop and a combined crop (wheat + pea and triticale + pea) in four replicates. The results show that, in the first year of the experiment, the value of the harvest index varied from 32.5% (triticale + pea) to 39.3% (wheat monocrop), while in the second year of the research, the value of the harvest index varied from 26.4% (wheat + pea) and 28.1% (triticale + pea). As for the components of harvest index, values of weight of grains spike-1 and weight of total above ground biomass were higher in intercrops than in monocrops system of cultivation. It can be concluded that the intercropping of cereals (triticale and wheat) and forage crops (pea) provided positive effects on weight of grains spike-1 and weight of total above ground biomass and does not diminish harvest index when compared to standard system of cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First-year harvest index ranged from 32.5% in triticale plus pea to 39.3% in wheat monocrop.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Value
32.5%e0
Qualifier
39.3%e0
Comparator
wheat monocrope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the first year of the experiment, the value of the harvest index varied from 32.5% (triticale + pea) to 39.3% (wheat monocrop)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–725 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second-year harvest index ranged from 26.4% in wheat plus pea to 28.1% in triticale plus pea.

Outcome
harvest indexe0
Value
26.4%e0
Qualifier
28.1%e0
Comparator
triticale + peae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the second year of the research, the value of the harvest index varied from 26.4% (wheat + pea) and 28.1% (triticale + pea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–859 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain weight per spike was higher in intercrops than monocrops.

Treatment
intercropse0
Outcome
weight of grains spike-1e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
monocropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“values of weight of grains spike-1 and weight of total above ground biomass were higher in intercrops than in monocrops system of cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1042 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total aboveground biomass was higher in intercrops than monocrops.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
intercropse0
Outcome
weight of total above ground biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
monocropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“values of weight of grains spike-1 and weight of total above ground biomass were higher in intercrops than in monocrops system of cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1042 · show in text ↑
t0

“triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping did not diminish harvest index compared with standard cultivation.

Treatment
intercroppinge1
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
does not diminishe0
Comparator
standard system of cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“does not diminish harvest index when compared to standard system of cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1321 · show in text ↑
e1

“intercropping of cereals (triticale and wheat) and forage crops (pea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1142 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

189 papers: 131 positive, 58 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

185 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

intercropping · growth · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.