Abstract

Irrigated agriculture in semi-arid regions is expected to increase in the future, which puts greater demands on scarce water resources. Sustainable irrigation strategies in semi-arid regions will support agricultural resilience to climatic change. The response of “Sweetheart”/Mazzard sweet cherry trees ( Prunus avium L.) to postharvest deficit irrigation (PDI), as a water conservation method, was studied over three seasons (2019–2022) in the semi-arid Okanagan Valley of British Columbia, at five commercial orchards. The following irrigation treatments were applied; ( i) a control of full irrigation, irrigated according to conventional growers’ practice at each orchard, ( ii) PDI-30: 27%–33% reduction in irrigation volume, after harvest (67%–73% of control), and ( iii) PDI-50: 47%–52% reduction in irrigation volume, after harvest (48–53% of control). Spring phenology (the timing of flower bud development, from side green to full bloom), flower bud moisture content and cold hardiness, and fruit yield and quality (before and after cold storage and shelf-life conditions) were assessed to determine if PDI altered fruit development over the subsequent growing season. Neither PDI-30 nor PDI-50 caused changes in the timing of flower bud phenology, cold hardiness or moisture content relative to the control. PDI treatments also had no effect on fruit yield or fruit quality at harvest or after storage and shelf-life conditions. These results suggest PDI could be used to reduce irrigation water use in semi-arid regions, like the Okanagan Valley, without affecting sweet cherry production or fruit quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PDI-30 did not change the timing of flower bud phenology, cold hardiness or moisture content relative to control.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
PDI-30e0
Outcome
timing of flower bud phenology, cold hardiness or moisture contente0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of postharvest deficit irrigation on sweet cherry (Prunus avium) in five Okanagan Valley, Canada, orchards: II. Phenology, cold hardiness, fruit yield, and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–171 · show in text ↑
e0

“Neither PDI-30 nor PDI-50 caused changes in the timing of flower bud phenology, cold hardiness or moisture content relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1318 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PDI-50 did not change the timing of flower bud phenology, cold hardiness or moisture content relative to control.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
PDI-50e0
Outcome
timing of flower bud phenology, cold hardiness or moisture contente0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of postharvest deficit irrigation on sweet cherry (Prunus avium) in five Okanagan Valley, Canada, orchards: II. Phenology, cold hardiness, fruit yield, and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–171 · show in text ↑
e0

“Neither PDI-30 nor PDI-50 caused changes in the timing of flower bud phenology, cold hardiness or moisture content relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1318 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PDI treatments had no effect on fruit yield or fruit quality at harvest or after storage.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
PDI treatmentse1
Outcome
fruit yield or fruit qualitye1
Direction
no effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of postharvest deficit irrigation on sweet cherry (Prunus avium) in five Okanagan Valley, Canada, orchards: II. Phenology, cold hardiness, fruit yield, and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–171 · show in text ↑
e1

“PDI treatments also had no effect on fruit yield or fruit quality at harvest or after storage and shelf-life conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1439 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

PDI could be used to reduce irrigation water use in semi-arid regions without affecting sweet cherry production or fruit quality.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviumt0
Treatment
PDIe2
Outcome
irrigation water usee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of postharvest deficit irrigation on sweet cherry (Prunus avium) in five Okanagan Valley, Canada, orchards: II. Phenology, cold hardiness, fruit yield, and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–171 · show in text ↑
e2

“These results suggest PDI could be used to reduce irrigation water use in semi-arid regions, like the Okanagan Valley, without affecting sweet cherry production or fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1618 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: grain · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.