Abstract
This experiment was carried out to determine the effects of GA3, (50, 100, 200 and 400 ppm); CEPA (100, 200, 400 and 800 ppm); CCC and B-9 (500, 1000 and 2000 ppm) on bud burst and rooting of Chaush cv. cuttings taken during imposed dormancy (at the end of February under Central Anatolia conditions). GA3 at 50 ppm, CEPA at all concentrations, and B-9 at 500 and 1000 ppm markedly delayed bud burst. CCC treatments hastened bud growth significantly. All growth regulators had no significant effect on % bud break. GA3 treatments and B-9 at 1000 and 2000 ppm definitely inhibited root formation. CEPA treatments markedly delayed root formation, decreased % rooting and fresh root weight per cutting. CCC treatments had no effect on bud burst and % rooting but only 2000 ppm markedly increased fresh root weight per cutting.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
GA3 at 50 ppm delayed bud burst.
- Taxon
- Vitis Vinifera
Vitis viniferat0 - Treatment
- GA3 at 50 ppme0
- Outcome
- bud burste0
- Direction
- delayede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“GA3 at 50 ppm, CEPA at all concentrations, and B-9 at 500 and 1000 ppm markedly delayed bud burst.”
t0“Vitis Vinifera”
Claim · model-written summary
CEPA at all tested concentrations delayed bud burst.
- Taxon
- Vitis ViniferaVitis viniferat0
- Treatment
- CEPA at all concentrationse0
- Outcome
- bud burste0
- Direction
- delayede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“GA3 at 50 ppm, CEPA at all concentrations, and B-9 at 500 and 1000 ppm markedly delayed bud burst.”
t0“Vitis Vinifera”
Claim · model-written summary
B-9 at 500 and 1000 ppm delayed bud burst.
- Taxon
- Vitis ViniferaVitis viniferat0
- Treatment
- B-9 at 500 and 1000 ppme0
- Outcome
- bud burste0
- Direction
- delayede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“GA3 at 50 ppm, CEPA at all concentrations, and B-9 at 500 and 1000 ppm markedly delayed bud burst.”
t0“Vitis Vinifera”
Claim · model-written summary
CCC significantly hastened bud growth.
- Taxon
- Vitis ViniferaVitis viniferat0
- Treatment
- CCC treatmentse0
- Outcome
- bud growthe0
- Direction
- hastenede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“CCC treatments hastened bud growth significantly.”
t0“Vitis Vinifera”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth regulators showed no significant effect on percentage bud break.
- Taxon
- Vitis ViniferaVitis viniferat0
- Treatment
- All growth regulatorse0
- Outcome
- % bud breake0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All growth regulators had no significant effect on % bud break.”
t0“Vitis Vinifera”
Claim · model-written summary
GA3 treatments inhibited root formation.
- Taxon
- Vitis ViniferaVitis viniferat0
- Treatment
- GA3 treatmentse0
- Outcome
- root formatione0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“GA3 treatments and B-9 at 1000 and 2000 ppm definitely inhibited root formation.”
t0“Vitis Vinifera”
Claim · model-written summary
B-9 at 1000 and 2000 ppm inhibited root formation.
- Taxon
- Vitis ViniferaVitis viniferat0
- Treatment
- B-9 at 1000 and 2000 ppme0
- Outcome
- root formatione0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“GA3 treatments and B-9 at 1000 and 2000 ppm definitely inhibited root formation.”
t0“Vitis Vinifera”
Claim · model-written summary
CEPA delayed root formation.
- Taxon
- Vitis ViniferaVitis viniferat0
- Treatment
- CEPA treatmentse0
- Outcome
- root formatione0
- Direction
- delayede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“CEPA treatments markedly delayed root formation, decreased % rooting and fresh root weight per cutting.”
t0“Vitis Vinifera”
Claim · model-written summary
CEPA decreased percentage rooting and fresh root weight per cutting.
- Taxon
- Vitis ViniferaVitis viniferat0
- Treatment
- CEPA treatmentse0
- Outcome
- % rooting and fresh root weight per cuttinge0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“CEPA treatments markedly delayed root formation, decreased % rooting and fresh root weight per cutting.”
t0“Vitis Vinifera”
Claim · model-written summary
CCC had no effect on bud burst or percentage rooting.
- Taxon
- Vitis ViniferaVitis viniferat0
- Treatment
- CCC treatmentse0
- Outcome
- bud burst and % rootinge0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“CCC treatments had no effect on bud burst and % rooting but only 2000 ppm markedly increased fresh root weight per cutting.”
t0“Vitis Vinifera”
Claim · model-written summary
CCC at 2000 ppm increased fresh root weight per cutting.
- Taxon
- Vitis ViniferaVitis viniferat0
- Treatment
- CCC treatmentse0
- Outcome
- fresh root weight per cuttinge0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- 2000 ppme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“CCC treatments had no effect on bud burst and % rooting but only 2000 ppm markedly increased fresh root weight per cutting.”
t0“Vitis Vinifera”
The same questions in other papers
chlormequat chloride · growth · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
Gibberellic acid · phenology · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
Gibberellic acid · growth · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.