Paper · 2023 · Plants

Effects of Plasma-Activated Water on Leaf and Fruit Biochemical Composition and Scion Growth in Apple

Andrei Kuzin; Alexei Solovchenko; Dmitry Khort; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
22
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The application of plasma-activated water (PAW) in agriculture has gained the attention of researchers and practitioners. In particular, treatment with PAW is a promising method for increasing scion and rootstock survival as well as augmenting the mineral nutrition applicable to tree fruit crops. However, the applications of PAW are hampered by the lack of information about the effects of PAW on apple tree condition and yield. The increase in survival rate by PAW is believed to stem from the general stimulation of physiological processes in the plant tissue. To assess the actual effect of the PAW treatments, one needs to consider an important indicator of young tree quality such as their vegetative growth. We conducted field experiments to study the possibility of use of PAW for increase in primary nutrient contents in fruits and leaves in an orchard, as well as to assess the scion survival rate and vegetative growth of young grafts in a nursery. The application of PAW influenced the fruitset, yield, leaf nitrogen (N) and potassium (K), fruit phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca) ascorbic acid (AA) and titratable acidity (TA). Treatment with PAW did not significantly reduce the negative impact of the rootstock thickness on the survival rate of bench grafts and their subsequent development. At the same time, scion survival tended to increase in the case when the scions and the rootstocks were of compatible thickness. Further studies of the PAW treatment effects are needed to better understand its applicability in diverse fields of horticulture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAW influenced apple fruitset.

Treatment
PAWe0
Outcome
fruitsete0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of PAW influenced the fruitset, yield, leaf nitrogen (N) and potassium (K), fruit phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca) ascorbic acid (AA) and titratable acidity (TA).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAW influenced apple yield.

Treatment
PAWe0
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of PAW influenced the fruitset, yield, leaf nitrogen (N) and potassium (K), fruit phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca) ascorbic acid (AA) and titratable acidity (TA).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAW influenced apple leaf nitrogen.

Treatment
PAWe0
Outcome
leaf nitrogen (N)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of PAW influenced the fruitset, yield, leaf nitrogen (N) and potassium (K), fruit phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca) ascorbic acid (AA) and titratable acidity (TA).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAW influenced apple leaf potassium.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
PAWe0
Outcome
potassium (K)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of PAW influenced the fruitset, yield, leaf nitrogen (N) and potassium (K), fruit phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca) ascorbic acid (AA) and titratable acidity (TA).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAW influenced apple fruit phosphorus.

Treatment
PAWe0
Outcome
fruit phosphorus (P)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of PAW influenced the fruitset, yield, leaf nitrogen (N) and potassium (K), fruit phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca) ascorbic acid (AA) and titratable acidity (TA).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAW influenced apple fruit calcium.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
PAWe0
Outcome
calcium (Ca)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of PAW influenced the fruitset, yield, leaf nitrogen (N) and potassium (K), fruit phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca) ascorbic acid (AA) and titratable acidity (TA).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAW influenced apple fruit ascorbic acid.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
PAWe0
Outcome
ascorbic acid (AA)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of PAW influenced the fruitset, yield, leaf nitrogen (N) and potassium (K), fruit phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca) ascorbic acid (AA) and titratable acidity (TA).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAW influenced apple fruit titratable acidity.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
PAWe0
Outcome
titratable acidity (TA)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of PAW influenced the fruitset, yield, leaf nitrogen (N) and potassium (K), fruit phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca) ascorbic acid (AA) and titratable acidity (TA).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PAW did not significantly reduce the negative effect of rootstock thickness on graft survival and development.

Treatment
PAWe0
Outcome
survival rate of bench grafts and their subsequent developmente0
Direction
did not significantly reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with PAW did not significantly reduce the negative impact of the rootstock thickness on the survival rate of bench grafts and their subsequent development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1301 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scion survival tended to rise when scion and rootstock thickness were compatible.

Material
scionse0
Outcome
scion survivale0
Direction
tended to increasee0
Qualifier
compatible thicknesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“scion survival tended to increase in the case when the scions and the rootstocks were of compatible thickness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1430 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑

physical treatment · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.