Abstract
The present field investigation was carried out in the Prayagraj district of Uttar Pradesh. The experiment was conducted in rabi 2021 -22 at Central Research Farm, SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraj. The field replicated in RBD with seven treatments and one control plot. To check the comparative efficacy of certain chemicals and biopesticides against pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on chickpea. The result of the efficacy of treatments showed that both chemicals and Biopesticides are effective against pod borer even if they have slight percent larval reductions. The different chemicals and Biopesticide treatments reveal that the most effective population infestation of pod borer, was recorded in, Chlorantraniliprole (0.46) followed by Spinosad (0.80), Emamectin benzoate (01.13), NSKE (01.46), Beauveria bassiana (01.66), Metarhizium anisiopilae (02.00), Bacillus thurenginesis (02.26) and the highest population of Pod borer was found in Control T0 (5.2). In another parameter higher yield and benefit cost ratio was recorded in chlorantraniliprole (18.89 q/ha and 1:2.21) followed by Spinosad (17.30 q/ha and 1:2.18), Emamectin Benzoate (15.80 q/ha and 1:2.14), NSKE (14.90 q/ha and 1:1.88), Beauveria bassiana (13.50 q/ha and 1:2.01), Metarhizium anisiopilae (11.63 q/ha and 1:1.50), Bacillus thurenginesis (9.80 q/ha and 1:1.62) as compared to control (7.42 q/ha and 1:2.01).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Chemicals and biopesticides were effective against pod borer, with slight larval reductions.
- Taxon
- Chickpea
Cicer arietinume2 - Treatment
- chemicals and Biopesticidese1
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=60)
Helicoverpa armigerae2pest - Outcome
- pod borere1
- Direction
- effectivee1
- Qualifier
- slight percent larval reductionse1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“both chemicals and Biopesticides are effective against pod borer even if they have slight percent larval reductions”
e2“Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole gave a lower pod borer population than the control.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinume4
- Treatment
- Chlorantraniliprolee3
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae4pest
- Outcome
- population infestation of pod borere1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 0.46e3
- Qualifier
- 5.2e2
- Comparator
- Control T0e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the most effective population infestation of pod borer”
e2“the highest population of Pod borer was found in Control T0 (5.2)”
e3“Chlorantraniliprole (0.46)”
e4“Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad gave a lower pod borer population than the control.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinume4
- Treatment
- Spinosade3
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae4pest
- Outcome
- population infestation of pod borere1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 0.80e3
- Qualifier
- 5.2e2
- Comparator
- Control T0e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the most effective population infestation of pod borer”
e2“the highest population of Pod borer was found in Control T0 (5.2)”
e3“Spinosad (0.80)”
e4“Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Emamectin benzoate gave a lower pod borer population than the control.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinume4
- Treatment
- Emamectin benzoatee3
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae4pest
- Outcome
- population infestation of pod borere1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 01.13e3
- Qualifier
- 5.2e2
- Comparator
- Control T0e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the most effective population infestation of pod borer”
e2“the highest population of Pod borer was found in Control T0 (5.2)”
e3“Emamectin benzoate (01.13)”
e4“Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
NSKE gave a lower pod borer population than the control.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinume4
- Treatment
- NSKEe3
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae4pest
- Outcome
- population infestation of pod borere1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 01.46e3
- Qualifier
- 5.2e2
- Comparator
- Control T0e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the most effective population infestation of pod borer”
e2“the highest population of Pod borer was found in Control T0 (5.2)”
e3“NSKE (01.46)”
e4“Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Beauveria bassiana gave a lower pod borer population than the control.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinume4
- Treatment
- Beauveria bassianae3
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae4pest
- Second interactor
- Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassianae3biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- population infestation of pod borere1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 01.66e3
- Qualifier
- 5.2e2
- Comparator
- Control T0e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the most effective population infestation of pod borer”
e2“the highest population of Pod borer was found in Control T0 (5.2)”
e3“Beauveria bassiana (01.66)”
e4“Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Metarhizium anisiopilae gave a lower pod borer population than the control.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinume4
- Treatment
- Metarhizium anisiopilaee3
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae4pest
- Second interactor
- Metarhizium anisiopilaee3biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- population infestation of pod borere1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 02.00e3
- Qualifier
- 5.2e2
- Comparator
- Control T0e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the most effective population infestation of pod borer”
e2“the highest population of Pod borer was found in Control T0 (5.2)”
e3“Metarhizium anisiopilae (02.00)”
e4“Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Bacillus thurenginesis gave a lower pod borer population than the control.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinume4
- Treatment
- Bacillus thurenginesise3
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae4pest
- Second interactor
- Bacillus thurenginesise3biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- population infestation of pod borere1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 02.26e3
- Qualifier
- 5.2e2
- Comparator
- Control T0e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the most effective population infestation of pod borer”
e2“the highest population of Pod borer was found in Control T0 (5.2)”
e3“Bacillus thurenginesis (02.26)”
e4“Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole gave a higher yield and benefit cost ratio than control on chickpea.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinume4
- Treatment
- Chlorantraniliprolee1
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae4pest
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 18.89 q/ha and 1:2.21e1
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“higher yield and benefit cost ratio was recorded in chlorantraniliprole (18.89 q/ha and 1:2.21)”
e2“as compared to control (7.42 q/ha and 1:2.01)”
e4“Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad gave a higher yield and benefit cost ratio than control on chickpea.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinume4
- Treatment
- Spinosade1
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae4pest
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 17.30 q/ha and 1:2.18e1
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“higher yield and benefit cost ratio was recorded in chlorantraniliprole (18.89 q/ha and 1:2.21) followed by Spinosad (17.30 q/ha and 1:2.18)”
e2“as compared to control (7.42 q/ha and 1:2.01)”
e4“Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Emamectin Benzoate gave a higher yield and benefit cost ratio than control on chickpea.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinume4
- Treatment
- Emamectin Benzoatee1
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae4pest
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 15.80 q/ha and 1:2.14e1
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“higher yield and benefit cost ratio was recorded in chlorantraniliprole (18.89 q/ha and 1:2.21) followed by Spinosad (17.30 q/ha and 1:2.18), Emamectin Benzoate (15.80 q/ha and 1:2.14)”
e2“as compared to control (7.42 q/ha and 1:2.01)”
e4“Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
NSKE gave a higher yield and benefit cost ratio than control on chickpea.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinume4
- Treatment
- NSKEe1
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae4pest
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 14.90 q/ha and 1:1.88e1
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“higher yield and benefit cost ratio was recorded in chlorantraniliprole (18.89 q/ha and 1:2.21) followed by Spinosad (17.30 q/ha and 1:2.18), Emamectin Benzoate (15.80 q/ha and 1:2.14), NSKE (14.90 q/ha and 1:1.88)”
e2“as compared to control (7.42 q/ha and 1:2.01)”
e4“Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Beauveria bassiana gave a higher yield and benefit cost ratio than control on chickpea.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinume4
- Treatment
- Beauveria bassianae1
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae4pest
- Second interactor
- Beauveria bassianaBeauveria bassianae1biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 13.50 q/ha and 1:2.01e1
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“higher yield and benefit cost ratio was recorded in chlorantraniliprole (18.89 q/ha and 1:2.21) followed by Spinosad (17.30 q/ha and 1:2.18), Emamectin Benzoate (15.80 q/ha and 1:2.14), NSKE (14.90 q/ha and 1:1.88), Beauveria bassiana (13.50 q/ha and 1:2.01)”
e2“as compared to control (7.42 q/ha and 1:2.01)”
e4“Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Metarhizium anisiopilae gave a higher yield and benefit cost ratio than control on chickpea.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinume4
- Treatment
- Metarhizium anisiopilaee1
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae4pest
- Second interactor
- Metarhizium anisiopilaee1biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 11.63 q/ha and 1:1.50e1
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“higher yield and benefit cost ratio was recorded in chlorantraniliprole (18.89 q/ha and 1:2.21) followed by Spinosad (17.30 q/ha and 1:2.18), Emamectin Benzoate (15.80 q/ha and 1:2.14), NSKE (14.90 q/ha and 1:1.88), Beauveria bassiana (13.50 q/ha and 1:2.01), Metarhizium anisiopilae (11.63 q/ha and 1:1.50)”
e2“as compared to control (7.42 q/ha and 1:2.01)”
e4“Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Bacillus thurenginesis gave a higher yield and benefit cost ratio than control on chickpea.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinume4
- Treatment
- Bacillus thurenginesise1
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae4pest
- Second interactor
- Bacillus thurenginesise1biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 9.80 q/ha and 1:1.62e1
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“higher yield and benefit cost ratio was recorded in chlorantraniliprole (18.89 q/ha and 1:2.21) followed by Spinosad (17.30 q/ha and 1:2.18), Emamectin Benzoate (15.80 q/ha and 1:2.14), NSKE (14.90 q/ha and 1:1.88), Beauveria bassiana (13.50 q/ha and 1:2.01), Metarhizium anisiopilae (11.63 q/ha and 1:1.50), Bacillus thurenginesis (9.80 q/ha and 1:1.62)”
e2“as compared to control (7.42 q/ha and 1:2.01)”
e4“Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on Chickpea”
The same questions in other papers
Metarhizium · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
Beauveria bassiana · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →emamectin benzoate · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
13 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →chlorantraniliprole · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
14 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →spinosad · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
22 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →biocontrol · Helicoverpa armigera · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.