Paper · 2022 · Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research

Efficacy of Prepared Composts on Onion Productivity and Quality

Zaheer Ahmed Lashari; Muhammad Saleem Sarki; Saleem Maseeh Bhatti; et al.

16
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A gricultural wastes have been a major source of pollution in recent years, and the challenges posed by them are receiving attention worldwide Agriculture sector generates a considerable number of wastes in the form of crop straw and animal manures which Abstract | Composting is a natural process of decomposing organic wastes into valued fertilizer that enriches plants and soil. The present research was undertaken to prepare composts utilizing organic wastes and to testify their impacts on onion cultivation. Three dissimilar composts with variable recipes viz. banana plants + poultry manure (Compost 1), banana plants + goat manure (Compost 2) and banana plants + cattle manure (Compost 3) in 3:1 ratio were prepared in cemented pits. The prepared composts were sampled and analyzed for selected parameters. Afterwards, a field experiment was executed to study the effect of prepared composts and their integration with inorganic fertilizer on growth and yield of onion (Allium cepa L.). The treatments were: T 1 =Control (No NPK and/or Compost), T 2 =Recommended NPK (120-60-60 kg ha -1 ), T 3 =Compost 1 (15 tons ha -1 ), T 4 =Compost 2 (15 tons ha -1 ), T 5 Compost 3 (15 tons ha -1 ), T 6 =Compost 1 (10 tons ha -1 ) +1/2 NPK, T 7 =Compost 2 (10 tons ha -1 ) +1/2 NPK, and T 8 Compost 3 (10 tons ha -1 )+1/2 NPK. Results showed that in various composts, the ranges of different parameters were EC: 2.50 to 3.34 dS m -1 , pH: 7.9 to 8.4, total C: 13.34 to 32.48%, total N: 0.64 to 1.86%, total P: 1.36 to 1.46%, total K: 1.45 to 3.05%, C:N ratio: 16.85 to 22.20, C:P ratio: 10.39 to 23.56 and C:K ratio: 14.64 to 17.66. All these values were inside the satisfactory limits of a matured compost. In the field trial, the plants treated with T 6 (Compost 1 (10 tons ha - 1 ) +1/2 NPK) significantly improved the growth and yield attributes of onion crop than all other treatments. Compost or NPK application either in integration or alone boosted the NPK levels in onion leaves with respect to control treatment. The upmost content of N (0.91 %), P (0.91 %) and K (2.80 %) were recorded from T 8 , T 2, and T 7 respectively. We suggest that an integration of compost with inorganic fertilizer is a better choice for improved growth, yield and quality of onion crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost EC ranged from 2.50 to 3.34 dS m -1.

Outcome
ECe0
Value
2.50 to 3.34 dS m -1e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“EC: 2.50 to 3.34 dS m -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1429 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost pH ranged from 7.9 to 8.4.

Outcome
pHe0
Value
7.9 to 8.4e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“pH: 7.9 to 8.4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1446 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost total C ranged from 13.34 to 32.48%.

Outcome
total Ce0
Value
13.34 to 32.48%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“total C: 13.34 to 32.48%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1472 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost total N ranged from 0.64 to 1.86%.

Outcome
total Ne0
Value
0.64 to 1.86%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“total N: 0.64 to 1.86%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1496 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost total P ranged from 1.36 to 1.46%.

Outcome
total Pe0
Value
1.36 to 1.46%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“total P: 1.36 to 1.46%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1520 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost total K ranged from 1.45 to 3.05%.

Outcome
total Ke0
Value
1.45 to 3.05%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“total K: 1.45 to 3.05%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1544 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost C:N ratio ranged from 16.85 to 22.20.

Outcome
C:N ratioe0
Value
16.85 to 22.20e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“C:N ratio: 16.85 to 22.20”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1571 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost C:P ratio ranged from 10.39 to 23.56.

Outcome
C:P ratioe0
Value
10.39 to 23.56e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“C:P ratio: 10.39 to 23.56”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1598 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost C:K ratio ranged from 14.64 to 17.66.

Outcome
C:K ratioe0
Value
14.64 to 17.66e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“C:K ratio: 14.64 to 17.66”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1628 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All reported compost parameters were within satisfactory maturity limits.

Outcome
satisfactory limits of a matured composte0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“All these values were inside the satisfactory limits of a matured compost.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1704 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T 6 improved onion growth and yield attributes compared with all other treatments.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
T 6 (Compost 1 (10 tons ha - 1 ) +1/2 NPK)e0
Outcome
growth and yield attributese0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
all other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the plants treated with T 6 (Compost 1 (10 tons ha - 1 ) +1/2 NPK) significantly improved the growth and yield attributes of onion crop than all other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1725–1887 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost or NPK, alone or integrated, raised onion leaf NPK levels over control.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
Compost or NPK application either in integration or alonee0
Outcome
NPK levels in onion leavese0
Direction
boostede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compost or NPK application either in integration or alone boosted the NPK levels in onion leaves with respect to control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1888–2019 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T 8 gave the highest leaf N content, 0.91 %.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
T 8e0
Outcome
content of Ne0
Direction
upmoste0
Value
0.91 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The upmost content of N (0.91 %), P (0.91 %) and K (2.80 %) were recorded from T 8 , T 2, and T 7 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2020–2131 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion Productivity and Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T 2 gave the highest leaf P content, 0.91 %.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
T 2e0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
upmoste0
Value
0.91 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The upmost content of N (0.91 %), P (0.91 %) and K (2.80 %) were recorded from T 8 , T 2, and T 7 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2020–2131 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion Productivity and Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T 7 gave the highest leaf K content, 2.80 %.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
T 7e0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
upmoste0
Value
2.80 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The upmost content of N (0.91 %), P (0.91 %) and K (2.80 %) were recorded from T 8 , T 2, and T 7 respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2020–2131 · show in text ↑
t0

“Onion Productivity and Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–63 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend integrated compost and inorganic fertilizer for onion growth, yield and quality.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
an integration of compost with inorganic fertilizere0
Direction
better choicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We suggest that an integration of compost with inorganic fertilizer is a better choice for improved growth, yield and quality of onion crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2132–2272 · show in text ↑

fertilization · organism · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

463 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

526 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.